SON (SON)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits a robust fundamental profile characterized by significant operational leverage and strong profitability metrics. A DuPont decomposition reveals that the 27.6% return on equity is driven primarily by high net margins of 13.3%, supported by moderate asset turnover, indicating efficient capital utilization rather than excessive financial engineering. This quality is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.23, which collectively signal low earnings manipulation risk and solid financial health despite the elevated equity multiplier suggesting leverage plays a secondary role in value creation compared to margin expansion. The return on invested capital stands at 9.1%, providing a baseline for assessing whether current valuation premiums are justified by future spread improvements or if they rely heavily on growth assumptions.
Valuation metrics present a compelling divergence between historical norms and intrinsic valuations, though market sentiment appears cautious. Trading at a forward P/E of 9.0x, the stock is priced significantly below its DCF-derived fair value estimate of $246, implying that current pricing does not fully incorporate the projected revenue growth trajectory or margin sustainability inherent in the business model. This discount suggests the market may be underweighting the quality signals provided by the high ROE and low manipulation scores, potentially leaving upside potential if earnings estimates converge with actual performance rather than conservative expectations embedded in the multiple.
However, insider activity introduces a notable counter-narrative to the otherwise positive fundamental picture. Over the last 90 days, net selling of $90,310 by insiders contrasts sharply with the aggressive revenue growth of 41.7% YoY and the attractive valuation gap relative to fair value. This divergence warrants scrutiny, as insider disposition can sometimes reflect a belief that current stock prices are undervalued or signal concerns about future cash flow conversion despite strong top-line expansion. Investors must weigh whether this selling represents opportunistic profit-taking against stronger fundamentals or serves as a warning regarding potential headwinds not yet visible in the financial statements.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.3% | 8.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $199 | $182 | $109 |
| 3% | $269 | $240 | $132 |
| 4% | $411 | $351 | $166 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $240 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like DVY or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SON shares regardless of SON's individual fundamentals. We estimate $373M of passive capital is structurally linked to SON through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on SON's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in SON to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If SON (SON) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SON. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SON Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest SON Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SON Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does SON convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
SON converts 23% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 77% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 78 | $52.30 | $4,079.4 |
| 2026-05-04 | 75 | $50.06 | $3,754.5 |
| 2026-04-28 | 7,453 | $50.25 | $374,513.25 |
| 2026-04-24 | 25,698 | $49.19 | $1.3M |
| 2026-04-20 | 720 | $57.41 | $41,335.2 |
| 2026-04-14 | 2,791 | $54.94 | $153,337.54 |
| 2026-03-24 | 3 | $51.78 | $155.34 |
| 2026-03-20 | 331 | $51.81 | $17,149.11 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1,618 | $53.68 | $86,854.24 |
| 2026-03-04 | 166 | $55.51 | $9,214.66 |
| 2026-02-24 | 10,440 | $56.87 | $593,722.8 |
| 2026-02-23 | 4 | $56.45 | $225.8 |
| 2026-02-18 | 227 | $56.72 | $12,875.44 |
| 2026-02-13 | 1,160 | $51.30 | $59,508 |
| 2026-02-12 | 1,118 | $51.42 | $57,487.56 |
| 2026-02-09 | 178 | $51.32 | $9,134.96 |
| 2026-02-06 | 50,000 | $50.82 | $2.5M |
| 2026-02-02 | 185 | $48.00 | $8,880 |
| 2026-01-27 | 2,183 | $48.94 | $106,836.02 |
| 2026-01-05 | 27,892 | $44.37 | $1.2M |
| 2025-12-29 | 204 | $43.50 | $8,874 |
| 2025-12-17 | 36,483 | $43.00 | $1.6M |
| 2025-11-07 | 1,184 | $40.45 | $47,892.8 |
| 2025-11-06 | 1,523 | $40.85 | $62,214.55 |
| 2025-10-31 | 1,609 | $39.27 | $63,185.43 |
| 2025-10-30 | 16 | $39.70 | $635.2 |
| 2025-10-28 | 64,495 | $39.46 | $2.5M |
| 2025-10-23 | 50 | $41.49 | $2,074.5 |
| 2025-10-21 | 2 | $40.52 | $81.04 |
| 2025-10-20 | 7,335 | $40.03 | $293,620.05 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare SON to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.