THG (THG)

$6.0B
Market Cap
9.5
P/E Ratio
0.29
Beta
2.24%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 1.1 DistressROIC−WACC -3.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company's capital allocation efficiency presents a nuanced picture, characterized by an ROIC of 4.1% that suggests limited value creation relative to the cost of equity in many traditional frameworks. Despite this modest return on invested capital, earnings per share are supported by significant leverage; the DuPont decomposition reveals that the 18.6% ROE is driven primarily by an Equity Multiplier of 4.74x rather than operational efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by a relatively low asset turnover of 0.39x and moderate net margins of 10.1%. This structural reliance on financial leverage to boost returns contrasts with the company's fundamental stability indicators: a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals mixed quality in balance sheet strength and profitability trends, while revenue growth remains subdued at just 5.6% year-over-year.

Valuation metrics currently reflect a market discount relative to intrinsic value models. The stock trades at a P/E ratio of 9.5x, which appears compressed when weighed against a DCF-derived fair value estimate of $1,539 per share. This disparity implies that the current pricing incorporates conservative assumptions regarding future cash flow generation or carries a significant risk premium not fully captured in standard discounted cash flow scenarios. The market's willingness to price at such multiples suggests skepticism about sustaining the growth trajectory required to justify higher valuations, particularly given the modest top-line expansion observed recently.

Risk assessment is further complicated by active insider dynamics and potential factor exposure. Over the last 90 days, insiders have executed $4,586,248 in net selling, a signal that management may be reducing their personal stake or rebalancing portfolios amidst uncertainty regarding future performance. While specific Fama-French alpha data is unavailable to confirm whether the stock has outperformed its risk-adjusted benchmark factors recently, the combination of insider distribution and low ROIC warrants caution for investors relying on momentum or quality factor strategies.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.3%9.3%
2%$1286$950$673
3%$1676$1144$762
4%$2456$1454$885

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $1144 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

10.1%
Net Margin
4.1%
ROIC
7.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -3.2%— Negative spread.
+5.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+55.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.2B
Free Cash Flow
11%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

10.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.39x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
4.74x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
18.6%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

3.74x
Debt / Equity
20.5x
Interest Coverage
0.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
19.06%
FCF Yield
882.4M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$5M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
2
Sale Transactions
2026-02-27CARLIN JANE DSold 3/8 qtrsSale$217,092
2026-02-24LOWSLEY DENISESold 3/8 qtrsGrant2,547 shares
2026-02-24SALVATORE BRYAN JSold 2/8 qtrsGrant6,140 shares
2026-02-24FARBER JEFFREY MSold 2/8 qtrsGrant11,318 shares
2026-02-24LAVEY RICHARD W.Sold 2/8 qtrsGrant6,828 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $3.51
Act: $3.87
+10.1%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $3.11
Act: $4.35
+40.1%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $4.22
Act: $5.09
+20.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $5.03
Act: $5.79
+15.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.70
Price/Book
338528
Avg Volume
$188.18
52W High
$147.76
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$528M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding THG
0.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$655B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or SDY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell THG shares regardless of THG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $528M of passive capital is structurally linked to THG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on THG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in THG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

THG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
THGEpicenterVBETFVIGETFVYMETFUNMHigh RiskRGAHigh RiskAFGHigh RiskFNFHigh RiskOSCRUnknown
THG Price Drop (%)0

If THG (THG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies UNUM GROUP (UNM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with THG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 20 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

THG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
THG

Float lock-up computed from 20 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

THG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does THG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.2B
EBITDA
$882M
FCF Conversion
133%
Reinvestment Rate
-33%
133% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.1%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-3.2%

THG converts 133% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1351$189.59$9,669.09
2026-04-062$176.10$352.2
2026-03-171$173.75$173.75
2026-03-131$174.28$174.28
2026-02-0932,156$175.97$5.7M
2026-02-0244,000$174.14$7.7M
2025-12-1659$186.22$10,986.98
2025-11-13249$182.39$45,415.11
2025-10-31138$170.26$23,495.88
2025-10-3017$168.39$2,862.63
2025-10-0325$182.12$4,553

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare THG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.