VICR (VICR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9). Beneish M-Score of -2.19 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $96 | $72 | $58 |
| 3% | $112 | $80 | $62 |
| 4% | $135 | $90 | $68 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $80 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYG or VBK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VICR shares regardless of VICR's individual fundamentals. We estimate $390M of passive capital is structurally linked to VICR through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VICR's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in VICR to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If VICR (VICR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies FLEX LTD (FLEX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with VICR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 10 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
VICR Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest VICR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
VICR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does VICR convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
VICR converts 116% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 65,257 | $312.96 | $20.4M |
| 2026-05-06 | 123,765 | $266.01 | $32.9M |
| 2026-05-05 | 106,879 | $251.02 | $26.8M |
| 2026-04-23 | 96 | $265.00 | $25,440 |
| 2026-04-21 | 481 | $224.81 | $108,133.61 |
| 2026-04-10 | 53 | $184.92 | $9,800.76 |
| 2026-04-08 | 788 | $159.83 | $125,946.04 |
| 2026-04-01 | 402 | $161.00 | $64,722 |
| 2026-03-31 | 3,556 | $142.22 | $505,734.32 |
| 2026-03-25 | 2,099 | $180.50 | $378,869.5 |
| 2026-03-23 | 20 | $164.54 | $3,290.8 |
| 2026-03-20 | 35,896 | $190.13 | $6.8M |
| 2026-03-19 | 37,824 | $191.84 | $7.3M |
| 2026-03-18 | 38,701 | $196.33 | $7.6M |
| 2026-03-17 | 38,520 | $185.42 | $7.1M |
| 2026-03-16 | 39,852 | $172.57 | $6.9M |
| 2026-03-13 | 37,787 | $167.81 | $6.3M |
| 2026-03-11 | 59 | $175.80 | $10,372.2 |
| 2026-03-03 | 6 | $209.19 | $1,255.14 |
| 2026-03-02 | 1,372 | $201.40 | $276,320.8 |
| 2026-02-23 | 6,493 | $170.01 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-19 | 16 | $155.61 | $2,489.76 |
| 2026-02-06 | 56 | $148.19 | $8,298.64 |
| 2026-02-04 | 650 | $166.76 | $108,394 |
| 2026-02-03 | 517 | $165.35 | $85,485.95 |
| 2026-01-20 | 25,768 | $149.88 | $3.9M |
| 2026-01-15 | 118 | $145.32 | $17,147.76 |
| 2026-01-13 | 500 | $139.12 | $69,560 |
| 2026-01-12 | 1,046 | $142.31 | $148,856.26 |
| 2026-01-07 | 13 | $138.92 | $1,805.96 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare VICR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.