VIRT (VIRT)

$11.7B
Market Cap
9.0
P/E Ratio
0.61
Beta
1.76%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -1.96 Flag (> −2.22)

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9). Beneish M-Score of -1.96 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits robust fundamental quality characterized by a high Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -1.96, signaling strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the 23.7% ROE is driven primarily by significant leverage (Equity Multiplier of 10.21x) rather than operational efficiency or pricing power; while net margins at 12.9% and gross margins at 64.3% indicate healthy profitability, they are insufficient to generate the return without substantial debt utilization. Asset turnover remains low at 0.18x, suggesting a capital-intensive model where returns rely heavily on financial engineering rather than rapid asset cycling.

Valuation analysis requires weighing these structural drivers against current market pricing. The stock commands a premium multiple relative to historical norms and sector peers if the high ROE is sustainable given its leverage-dependent nature. A DCF framework would likely hinge on whether future growth can decouple from this extreme equity multiplier, as implied by the 26.2% revenue growth YoY; however, maintaining such returns without increasing leverage further or improving asset efficiency presents a mathematical constraint. The market appears to be pricing in continued high-growth execution while simultaneously acknowledging the fragility inherent in an ROE structure dominated by debt.

Insider activity introduces a notable divergence from the positive fundamental metrics, with $13.5 million in net selling over the last 90 days. This capital outflow suggests internal stakeholders may perceive limited upside or are hedging against potential valuation compression despite the company's strong F-Score and revenue trajectory. The interplay between high insider liquidity events and a leverage-heavy return profile creates an asymmetric risk-reward dynamic where downside protection relies on margin stability, while upside is capped by the difficulty of sustaining 23.7% ROE without further balance sheet expansion or operational turnaround.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-1.96
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

64.3%
Gross Margin
12.9%
Net Margin
8.1%
ROIC
+26.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+69.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
454.9M
Free Cash Flow
77%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

12.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.18x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
10.21x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
23.7%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

9.21x
Debt / Equity
1.69x
Current Ratio
2.4x
Interest Coverage
3.8x
Net Debt / EBITDA
2.0B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$14M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
5
Sale Transactions
2026-02-19MOLLUSO JOSEPHSold 1/8 qtrsSale$8M
2026-02-17CAVOLI STEPHENSold 2/8 qtrsSale$1M
2026-02-13CAVOLI STEPHENSold 2/8 qtrsSale$3M
2026-02-05GAMBALE VIRGINIASold 3/8 qtrsSale$110,625
2026-02-04FAIRCLOUGH BRETTSold 2/8 qtrsGrant15,062 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.19
Act: $1.30
+9.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.37
Act: $1.53
+11.5%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.93
Act: $1.05
+12.8%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.29
Act: $1.85
+43.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.92
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$55.33
52W High
$31.55
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$136M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding VIRT
0.07%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$196B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYG or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VIRT shares regardless of VIRT's individual fundamentals. We estimate $136M of passive capital is structurally linked to VIRT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VIRT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in VIRT to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

VIRT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
VIRTEpicenterVYMETFVBRETFSPSMETFJPMHigh RiskBRK.BUnknownMALow RiskBACHigh RiskVLow Risk
VIRT Price Drop (%)0

If VIRT (VIRT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VIRT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

VIRT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
VIRT

Float lock-up computed from 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

VIRT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does VIRT convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$455M
EBITDA
$2.0B
FCF Conversion
23%
Reinvestment Rate
77%
23% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

VIRT converts 23% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 77% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1318,278$51.85$947,714.3
2026-05-054$49.55$198.2
2026-05-0424$48.12$1,154.88
2026-04-20200$50.65$10,130
2026-04-15232$51.28$11,896.96
2026-04-0768$47.49$3,229.32
2026-04-0627$46.22$1,247.94
2026-03-311,737$42.84$74,413.08
2026-03-23302$41.63$12,572.26
2026-03-1095$41.94$3,984.3
2026-03-095$41.01$205.05
2026-03-04563$41.64$23,443.32
2026-03-0320$42.73$854.6
2026-02-27100$41.74$4,174
2026-02-231,800$39.82$71,676
2026-02-201,200$39.37$47,244
2026-02-17390$38.34$14,952.6
2026-02-105$39.26$196.3
2025-12-30315$34.30$10,804.5
2025-12-29315$34.12$10,747.8
2025-12-261,401$33.78$47,325.78
2025-12-24315$33.38$10,514.7
2025-12-227,023$33.84$237,658.32
2025-12-17341$33.85$11,542.85
2025-12-1213,822$34.23$473,127.06
2025-12-0235$35.02$1,225.7
2025-11-0726$35.07$911.82
2025-10-3072$34.39$2,476.08
2025-10-238,085$33.41$270,119.85
2025-10-161,400$33.60$47,040

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare VIRT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.