VSNT (VSNT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.7.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for VSNT presents a notable divergence, characterized by an ROIC of 8.4% that sits comfortably above the implied cost of equity, suggesting value creation despite operational headwinds. This profitability is primarily margin-driven rather than asset-light; while the DuPont decomposition reveals low asset turnover at 0.54x and minimal leverage via a multiplier of just 1.19x, the robust net margin of 13.9%—supported by an impressive gross margin of 56.1%—anchors returns. Quality metrics further validate this structural strength: a Beneish M-Score of -3.26 indicates low earnings manipulation risk, and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects moderate financial stability amidst recent challenges. However, these fundamental strengths are currently counterbalanced by negative revenue momentum, with year-over-year growth contracting at -5.3%, signaling potential cyclical or competitive pressures that may constrain future margin expansion despite the current high profitability per dollar sold.
Valuation metrics suggest a significant market dislocation relative to intrinsic models and historical norms. The stock trades at a compressed 5.6x P/E, which appears deeply undervalued when contrasted against a DCF-derived fair value of $129; this wide gap implies the current price is pricing in severe downside or persistent execution risks not fully captured by static cash flow assumptions. While the low multiple offers a margin of safety on an absolute basis, it likely reflects skepticism regarding the sustainability of the 56.1% gross margins given the declining top-line trajectory. The market appears to be discounting future growth prospects heavily, potentially assuming that current profitability cannot persist without significant revenue recovery or operational restructuring.
The risk-reward profile hinges entirely on whether management can reverse the -5.3% revenue decline while maintaining its high-margin business model. If earnings quality remains intact as suggested by the low Beneish score and positive ROIC spread, the valuation gap may represent a compelling opportunity for mean reversion. Conversely, if the negative growth trend accelerates or margins compress due to volume pressures, the current P/E could expand significantly even without absolute price appreciation. Investors must weigh the safety of the depressed multiple against the uncertainty surrounding the path to revenue stabilization and whether the 8.4% ROIC can be sustained in a shrinking top-line environment.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $156 | $116 | $92 |
| 3% | $182 | $129 | $100 |
| 4% | $220 | $146 | $109 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $129 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VSNT shares regardless of VSNT's individual fundamentals. We estimate $360M of passive capital is structurally linked to VSNT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VSNT's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in VSNT to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If VSNT (VSNT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VSNT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
VSNT Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest VSNT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
VSNT Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does VSNT convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
VSNT converts 82% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 318 | $41.31 | $13,136.58 |
| 2026-05-08 | 2,130 | $40.78 | $86,861.4 |
| 2026-05-06 | 615 | $40.88 | $25,141.2 |
| 2026-04-29 | 121 | $39.16 | $4,738.36 |
| 2026-04-23 | 53 | $40.32 | $2,136.96 |
| 2026-04-20 | 522 | $40.86 | $21,328.92 |
| 2026-04-10 | 400 | $38.80 | $15,520 |
| 2026-04-09 | 79 | $38.53 | $3,043.87 |
| 2026-04-06 | 2,149 | $37.43 | $80,437.07 |
| 2026-04-01 | 956 | $37.02 | $35,391.12 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,707 | $36.09 | $61,605.63 |
| 2026-03-25 | 12,666 | $36.13 | $457,622.58 |
| 2026-03-24 | 958 | $36.60 | $35,062.8 |
| 2026-03-23 | 174 | $36.23 | $6,304.02 |
| 2026-03-20 | 985 | $35.50 | $34,967.5 |
| 2026-03-18 | 298 | $37.95 | $11,309.1 |
| 2026-03-17 | 971 | $38.00 | $36,898 |
| 2026-03-12 | 1,888 | $38.30 | $72,310.4 |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,909 | $36.54 | $69,754.86 |
| 2026-03-09 | 113 | $36.70 | $4,147.1 |
| 2026-03-05 | 109,935 | $36.02 | $4.0M |
| 2026-03-04 | 5 | $34.01 | $170.05 |
| 2026-03-03 | 1,641 | $32.74 | $53,726.34 |
| 2026-03-02 | 526 | $33.32 | $17,526.32 |
| 2026-02-27 | 1,517 | $32.48 | $49,272.16 |
| 2026-02-25 | 1,413 | $29.85 | $42,178.05 |
| 2026-02-24 | 274 | $29.60 | $8,110.4 |
| 2026-02-23 | 51 | $30.03 | $1,531.53 |
| 2026-02-20 | 7 | $30.04 | $210.28 |
| 2026-02-19 | 9 | $29.57 | $266.13 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare VSNT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.