VSNT (VSNT)

$5.2B
Market Cap
5.6
P/E Ratio
Beta
4.23%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 2.7 Gray ZoneBeneish M -3.26 CleanROIC−WACC -1.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.7.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for VSNT presents a notable divergence, characterized by an ROIC of 8.4% that sits comfortably above the implied cost of equity, suggesting value creation despite operational headwinds. This profitability is primarily margin-driven rather than asset-light; while the DuPont decomposition reveals low asset turnover at 0.54x and minimal leverage via a multiplier of just 1.19x, the robust net margin of 13.9%—supported by an impressive gross margin of 56.1%—anchors returns. Quality metrics further validate this structural strength: a Beneish M-Score of -3.26 indicates low earnings manipulation risk, and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects moderate financial stability amidst recent challenges. However, these fundamental strengths are currently counterbalanced by negative revenue momentum, with year-over-year growth contracting at -5.3%, signaling potential cyclical or competitive pressures that may constrain future margin expansion despite the current high profitability per dollar sold.

Valuation metrics suggest a significant market dislocation relative to intrinsic models and historical norms. The stock trades at a compressed 5.6x P/E, which appears deeply undervalued when contrasted against a DCF-derived fair value of $129; this wide gap implies the current price is pricing in severe downside or persistent execution risks not fully captured by static cash flow assumptions. While the low multiple offers a margin of safety on an absolute basis, it likely reflects skepticism regarding the sustainability of the 56.1% gross margins given the declining top-line trajectory. The market appears to be discounting future growth prospects heavily, potentially assuming that current profitability cannot persist without significant revenue recovery or operational restructuring.

The risk-reward profile hinges entirely on whether management can reverse the -5.3% revenue decline while maintaining its high-margin business model. If earnings quality remains intact as suggested by the low Beneish score and positive ROIC spread, the valuation gap may represent a compelling opportunity for mean reversion. Conversely, if the negative growth trend accelerates or margins compress due to volume pressures, the current P/E could expand significantly even without absolute price appreciation. Investors must weigh the safety of the depressed multiple against the uncertainty surrounding the path to revenue stabilization and whether the 8.4% ROIC can be sustained in a shrinking top-line environment.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →7.9%9.9%11.9%
2%$156$116$92
3%$182$129$100
4%$220$146$109

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $129 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.7
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.26
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

56.1%
Gross Margin
13.9%
Net Margin
8.4%
ROIC
9.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -1.5%— Negative spread.
-5.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-31.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.9B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

13.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.54x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.19x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
8.9%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.19x
Debt / Equity
4.02x
Current Ratio
95.5x
Interest Coverage
0.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
30.28%
FCF Yield
2.3B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

4.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.50
Price/Book
5M
Avg Volume
$59.00
52W High
$27.17
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$360M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding VSNT
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$352B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or SPSM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VSNT shares regardless of VSNT's individual fundamentals. We estimate $360M of passive capital is structurally linked to VSNT through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VSNT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in VSNT to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

VSNT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
VSNTEpicenterVBETFVXFETFVBRETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskGOOGLow RiskNFLXLow RiskVZHigh Risk
VSNT Price Drop (%)0

If VSNT (VSNT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VSNT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

VSNT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
VSNT

Float lock-up computed from 10 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

VSNT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does VSNT convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.9B
EBITDA
$2.3B
FCF Conversion
82%
Reinvestment Rate
18%
82% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-1.5%

VSNT converts 82% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-12318$41.31$13,136.58
2026-05-082,130$40.78$86,861.4
2026-05-06615$40.88$25,141.2
2026-04-29121$39.16$4,738.36
2026-04-2353$40.32$2,136.96
2026-04-20522$40.86$21,328.92
2026-04-10400$38.80$15,520
2026-04-0979$38.53$3,043.87
2026-04-062,149$37.43$80,437.07
2026-04-01956$37.02$35,391.12
2026-03-271,707$36.09$61,605.63
2026-03-2512,666$36.13$457,622.58
2026-03-24958$36.60$35,062.8
2026-03-23174$36.23$6,304.02
2026-03-20985$35.50$34,967.5
2026-03-18298$37.95$11,309.1
2026-03-17971$38.00$36,898
2026-03-121,888$38.30$72,310.4
2026-03-101,909$36.54$69,754.86
2026-03-09113$36.70$4,147.1
2026-03-05109,935$36.02$4.0M
2026-03-045$34.01$170.05
2026-03-031,641$32.74$53,726.34
2026-03-02526$33.32$17,526.32
2026-02-271,517$32.48$49,272.16
2026-02-251,413$29.85$42,178.05
2026-02-24274$29.60$8,110.4
2026-02-2351$30.03$1,531.53
2026-02-207$30.04$210.28
2026-02-199$29.57$266.13

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare VSNT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.