WTW (WTW)

$27.0B
Market Cap
17.6
P/E Ratio
0.62
Beta
1.36%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 1.4 DistressBeneish M -2.59 CleanROIC−WACC +3.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of WTW reveal a capital-efficient operator generating returns via moderate leverage rather than operational velocity. With an ROIC-WACC spread implied by the 19.9% DuPont-derived return on equity, the business model relies heavily on its 3.67x equity multiplier to amplify earnings, as asset turnover sits at a modest 0.33x. This capital structure supports robust profitability metrics, evidenced by a net margin of 16.5% and a gross margin expanding to 42.1%, while quality indicators remain strong with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.59 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk. However, this financial resilience contrasts sharply with the current revenue trajectory, which contracted by 2.2% year-over-year, indicating that high margins are sustaining returns despite top-line headwinds rather than being driven by volume expansion.

Valuation metrics present a divergence between historical context and intrinsic models. The stock currently trades at a P/E multiple of 17.6x; while specific sector averages or historical ranges were not provided to establish relative positioning, the data indicates this premium pricing exists against a backdrop of declining revenue growth. In contrast, discounted cash flow analysis assigns a fair value of $816 per share, implying that current market prices may be detached from intrinsic worth if future cash flows align with conservative DCF assumptions or if the implied growth rate required to justify the multiple exceeds realistic expectations given the recent contraction. The gap between these valuation anchors suggests the market is pricing in either significant mean reversion potential or a premium for the company's high-margin, leveraged quality that DCF models may not fully capture under current recessionary headwinds.

Risk and reward dynamics are further nuanced by insider behavior and factor exposures. Despite the revenue decline, insiders have executed $152,125 in net buying over the last 90 days, a signal often interpreted as management confidence in future operational turns or undervaluation relative to current fundamentals. While specific Fama-French alpha data is absent from the provided dataset, the combination of high leverage (Equity Multiplier >3) and negative revenue growth introduces solvency sensitivity during economic downturns, even though quality scores mitigate fraud risk. The convergence of insider accumulation with a DCF-based upside to $816 suggests a potential asymmetric opportunity, yet investors must weigh this against the precariousness of sustaining 42% gross margins while shrinking top-line revenues.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.9%9.9%
2%$1055$689$494
3%$1382$816$557
4%$2038$1008$640

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $816 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.59
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

42.1%
Gross Margin
16.5%
Net Margin
11.3%
ROIC
7.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +3.4%— Positive spread.
-2.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+1737.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.5B
Free Cash Flow
23%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

16.5%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.33x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.67x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
19.9%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.67x
Debt / Equity
1.20x
Current Ratio
8.5x
Interest Coverage
1.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.21%
FCF Yield
2.6B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$152,125
Net Buying
2
Buy Transactions
1
Sale Transactions
2026-03-03FURMAN MATTHEWSold 1/8 qtrsSale$912,009
2026-02-26KRASNER ANDREW JAYSold 1/8 qtrsOther68 shares
2026-02-25GEBAUER JULIE JARECKESold 1/8 qtrsGrant8,474 shares
2026-02-25HESS CARL AARONSold 1/8 qtrsGrant55,419 shares
2026-02-25KURPIS JOSEPH STEPHENGrant650 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $3.19
Act: $3.13
-1.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.60
Act: $2.86
+10.2%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $3.05
Act: $3.07
+0.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $7.93
Act: $8.12
+2.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

12.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.41
Price/Book
773188
Avg Volume
$352.79
52W High
$275.60
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.7B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding WTW
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$5.0T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like KIE or VFMV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WTW shares regardless of WTW's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to WTW through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in WTW to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

WTW Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
WTWEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFSPYETFBRK.BUnknownJPMHigh RiskVLow RiskMALow RiskBACHigh Risk
WTW Price Drop (%)0

If WTW (WTW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B (BRK.B) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with WTW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 19 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

WTW Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
WTW

Float lock-up computed from 19 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

WTW Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does WTW convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.5B
EBITDA
$2.6B
FCF Conversion
59%
Reinvestment Rate
41%
59% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
11.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
3.4%

WTW converts 59% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1318$251.44$4,525.92
2026-05-0729$252.41$7,319.89
2026-04-3046$290.11$13,345.06
2026-04-272,777$287.73$799,026.21
2026-03-3139$289.72$11,299.08
2026-03-273$286.80$860.4
2026-03-259$293.36$2,640.24
2026-03-24428$293.43$125,588.04
2026-03-23271$291.25$78,928.75
2026-03-1022,595$294.67$6.7M
2026-02-2750$308.29$15,414.5
2026-02-2510,809$291.27$3.1M
2026-02-191$301.92$301.92
2026-02-181,582$295.50$467,481
2026-02-063$327.32$981.96
2026-02-052$339.74$679.48
2026-01-2156$321.79$18,020.24
2026-01-02900$328.60$295,740
2025-12-292,429$334.60$812,743.4
2025-12-1810$329.84$3,298.4
2025-12-17400$329.76$131,904
2025-12-156,033$326.93$2.0M
2025-12-051$320.00$320
2025-11-2876$321.23$24,413.48
2025-11-21121$314.88$38,100.48
2025-11-201$317.37$317.37
2025-11-191$319.52$319.52
2025-11-143,844$324.30$1.2M
2025-11-1217$322.14$5,476.38
2025-11-062,348$323.06$758,544.88

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare WTW to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.