BlackRock, Inc. (BLK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBLK trades at 26.3x earnings — a 37% premium to its sector average of 19.2x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 1.7 falls in the academic distress zone. DCF fair value of $157 implies 85% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of BlackRock, Inc. reveal a stark divergence between its revenue generation capabilities and capital efficiency. While the company boasts robust top-line expansion with 18.7% year-over-year growth and maintains healthy gross margins at 46.7%, the return on invested capital stands at just 3.9%. This figure is critically undermined by an estimated cost of capital (WACC) of 13.1%, resulting in a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -9.3% that suggests value destruction relative to financing costs. The DuPont decomposition attributes its current 9.0% return on equity primarily to leverage, evidenced by an equity multiplier of 2.76x, rather than operational efficiency or margin expansion. Compounding these structural concerns are weak quality signals: a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates deteriorating financial health, while the Altman Z-Score of 1.6 places the firm in the "gray zone" for potential distress, despite a negative Beneish M-Score that technically flags low earnings manipulation risk but offers little solace given the other metrics.
Valuation multiples further underscore a significant disconnect between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates. Trading at a forward P/E of 27.4x, the stock commands a substantial premium over both its historical trajectory and an industry average of 18.4x. This aggressive pricing is not supported by discounted cash flow analysis, which assigns a fair value of $158 per share, implying an -83.6% downside from current levels if the model's assumptions hold. The market appears to be pricing in an exceptionally optimistic long-term free cash flow growth rate of 24.0% over the next decade; any material miss on this high-growth thesis would likely trigger a severe re-rating, given that implied returns already embed these lofty expectations into today's price.
Risk-adjusted performance metrics present a challenging picture for alpha generation and factor exposure. The stock has generated an annual Fama-French Alpha of -14.20%, indicating underperformance relative to its benchmark after adjusting for market risk. Furthermore, the Profitability Factor (RMW) score of -0.120 highlights weak profitability characteristics that contradict its high valuation multiple, while the Value Factor tilt remains positive at 0.552. Recent insider activity adds another layer of caution, with $123,999,194 in net selling over the past ninety days, suggesting management may view current valuations as elevated or anticipate headwinds not yet reflected in consensus estimates.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 19% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.2% | 13.2% | 15.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $179 | $147 | $125 |
| 3% | $194 | $157 | $131 |
| 4% | $214 | $168 | $138 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $1018.96.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $157 (-84.7%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 6% above its 5-year average P/E of 26.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedBlackRock, Inc. is currently trading at $1081.90 within the Financial Services sector. Without specific moving average data points or Relative Strength Index values provided in the input, a definitive assessment of whether price action sits above or below key trend lines cannot be calculated here. Consequently, it remains unclear if short-term momentum exhibits bullish strength or bearish weakness based solely on the available figures. The absence of these critical technical indicators prevents an analysis of whether recent price movements align with longer-term averages or suggest potential reversals in immediate trading ranges. In a typical market context, determining position relative to moving averages would clarify the prevailing trend direction, while RSI readings would illuminate overbought or oversold conditions. Since this data is missing from the current dataset, any conclusion regarding momentum strength or trend validity would be speculative rather than factual. The stock's price of $1081.90 stands as a singular data point without the surrounding technical framework necessary to evaluate its trajectory against historical performance metrics. Readers are advised that interpreting this limited information requires caution, as comprehensive technical analysis relies on multiple converging signals including average crossovers and oscillator levels. Until additional quantitative data regarding moving averages or momentum oscillators is supplied, a robust synthesis of trend health remains incomplete. The current snapshot offers only the absolute price level, leaving the broader narrative of market sentiment technically undefined within this specific summary.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-06 | $5.7300 | +10.0% |
| 2025-12-05 | $5.2100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-05 | $5.2100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-05 | $5.2100 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-07 | $5.2100 | +2.2% |
| 2024-12-05 | $5.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-09 | $5.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-07 | $5.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-06 | $5.1000 | +2.0% |
| 2023-12-06 | $5.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-07 | $5.0000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-07 | $5.0000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IYF or XLF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BLK shares regardless of BlackRock, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $17.9B of passive capital is structurally linked to BLK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BlackRock, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with BLK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BLK Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 BLK shares, reducing daily market volatility.
BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.6% of the IYF (IYF) and 2.1% of the State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Across 26 tracked ETFs, approximately 18M shares (11.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest BLK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 26 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BLK Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for BlackRock, Inc. over the past year sits near $1055.95 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $1018.96 sits 3.5% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
BLK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does BlackRock, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
BlackRock, Inc. converts 38% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 62% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 201 | $1084.83 | $218,050.83 |
| 2026-05-07 | 2,361 | $1073.57 | $2.5M |
| 2026-04-27 | 100 | $1044.97 | $104,497 |
| 2026-04-20 | 400 | $1052.14 | $420,856 |
| 2026-04-15 | 112 | $1054.56 | $118,110.72 |
| 2026-04-13 | 100 | $999.31 | $99,931 |
| 2026-04-06 | 61 | $966.56 | $58,960.16 |
| 2026-03-30 | 31 | $933.85 | $28,949.35 |
| 2026-03-27 | 6 | $968.46 | $5,810.76 |
| 2026-03-25 | 14 | $976.06 | $13,664.84 |
| 2026-03-09 | 562 | $955.45 | $536,962.9 |
| 2026-03-03 | 9,819 | $1068.31 | $10.5M |
| 2026-02-26 | 110 | $1093.78 | $120,315.8 |
| 2026-02-19 | 2 | $1092.26 | $2,184.52 |
| 2026-02-02 | 1,003 | $1118.94 | $1.1M |
| 2026-01-30 | 10 | $1127.78 | $11,277.8 |
| 2026-01-29 | 8 | $1121.67 | $8,973.36 |
| 2026-01-26 | 300 | $1129.91 | $338,973 |
| 2026-01-21 | 109 | $1110.05 | $120,995.45 |
| 2026-01-20 | 680 | $1163.17 | $790,955.6 |
| 2026-01-13 | 1 | $1089.26 | $1,089.26 |
| 2026-01-08 | 14 | $1075.09 | $15,051.26 |
| 2026-01-06 | 150 | $1119.76 | $167,964 |
| 2026-01-02 | 5 | $1070.34 | $5,351.7 |
| 2025-12-29 | 104 | $1088.11 | $113,163.44 |
| 2025-12-19 | 10 | $1064.99 | $10,649.9 |
| 2025-12-16 | 37 | $1082.16 | $40,039.92 |
| 2025-12-15 | 200 | $1089.09 | $217,818 |
| 2025-12-11 | 3 | $1083.36 | $3,250.08 |
| 2025-11-14 | 2,000 | $1069.65 | $2.1M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| STT | 0.713 | 0.641 | High co-movement |
| MC | 0.703 | 0.702 | High co-movement |
| BX | 0.696 | 0.675 | Moderate |
| MS | 0.696 | 0.673 | Moderate |
| KKR | 0.686 | 0.668 | Moderate |
| TROW | 0.665 | 0.631 | Moderate |
| GS | 0.663 | 0.620 | Moderate |
| IVZ | 0.656 | 0.710 | Moderate |
| CFG | 0.643 | 0.595 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare BLK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.