Technology

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV)

$119.27
-4.45%
$59.8B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 0.5 DistressBeneish M 0.06 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -9.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 0.5. Beneish M-Score of 0.06 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of CRWV present a stark dichotomy between explosive top-line expansion and severe profitability erosion. While the company exhibits robust revenue growth of 167.9% year-over-year, this momentum is being consumed by net margins contracting to -22.7%, driven primarily by low asset turnover rather than operational inefficiency in pricing power, as evidenced by healthy gross margins near 72%. The DuPont decomposition reveals that a high equity multiplier of 14.78x is propping up a negative return on equity of -35.0%, indicating heavy leverage is amplifying losses rather than generating returns on capital. Despite a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 suggesting moderate financial strength, the Beneish M-Score of 0.06 and zero ROIC raise red flags regarding earnings quality and sustainable cash flow generation under current operational conditions.

Valuation metrics reflect significant market skepticism regarding the sustainability of these results amidst deteriorating bottom-line performance. The disconnect between hyper-growth revenue figures and negative net income creates a challenging valuation framework where traditional multiples may be distorted by speculative expectations rather than fundamentals. Although Fama-French alpha data shows an annualized figure of 107.15%, this outlier is heavily influenced by the growth tilt factor (HML at -1.821) which penalizes high-growth, low-value stocks, while the minimal robust profitability score (RMW: 0.152) confirms that current earnings power does not justify premium valuations. The market appears to be pricing in a potential turnaround or restructuring given the extreme leverage and negative ROE, but historical comparisons would likely show this stock trading at a significant discount to sector peers if comparable profitable growth firms were available for reference.

Risk factors are amplified by substantial insider activity, with $386 million in net selling over the last 90 days signaling a pronounced lack of confidence from those closest to the business operations. This heavy distribution coincides with negative profitability and excessive leverage, creating a scenario where downside protection is weak despite the high Fama-French alpha anomaly. The combination of aggressive insider offloading, zero return on invested capital, and reliance on financial engineering rather than organic margin expansion suggests that future volatility could be severe as any deviation in revenue growth or cost structure would immediately impact an already fragile equity base.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price action for CoreWeave, Inc. at $103.77 presents a complex picture regarding institutional positioning within the technology sector. While specific moving average crossovers are not quantified in the provided snapshot, the proximity of major technical thresholds often dictates whether larger market participants view the asset as undervalued or overextended relative to its recent trajectory. In high-beta tech stocks like CRWV, price levels above $100 frequently attract significant capital inflows from funds seeking exposure to AI infrastructure growth, yet they also trigger risk management protocols that can lead to elevated selling pressure near psychological barriers. Volume trends in this context serve as a critical litmus test for the sustainability of any upward momentum or downward correction. If trading activity has been robust while prices remain steady around $103.77, it may suggest institutional accumulation is occurring alongside retail interest, potentially indicating that larger players are building positions without immediately driving the price higher. Conversely, declining volume during a pullback could signal a lack of immediate selling urgency from major holders, whereas spiking volume on dips might reflect active distribution or stop-loss executions by sophisticated algorithms monitoring short-term volatility. Ultimately, the interplay between these factors suggests that institutional behavior is likely bifurcated; some entities may be positioning for continued expansion based on sector tailwinds, while others could be hedging against potential mean reversion given the asset's inherent volatility. The absence of clear directional signals in this isolated data point

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.5
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
0.06
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

71.7%
Gross Margin
-22.7%
Net Margin
0.0%
ROIC
9.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -9.4%— Negative spread.
+167.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-35.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-7.3B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-22.7%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.10x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
14.78x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-35.0%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

13.78x
Debt / Equity
0.46x
Current Ratio
0.0x
Interest Coverage
4.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-11.13%
FCF Yield
2.5B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$387M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
53
Sale Transactions
2026-03-25INTRATOR MICHAEL NSold 2/2 qtrsSale$7M
2026-03-25INTRATOR MICHAEL NSold 2/2 qtrsOther50,000 shares
2026-03-23MCBEE BRANNINSold 2/2 qtrsSale$12M
2026-03-23MCBEE BRANNINSold 2/2 qtrsOther127,085 shares
2026-03-23MCBEE BRANNINSold 2/2 qtrsSale$2M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.22
Act: $-1.40
-538.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.49
Act: $-0.60
-21.7%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.48
Act: $-0.22
+54.4%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.68
Act: $-0.89
-30.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

118.0%
Annual Volatility
1.24
Sharpe (1Y)
-64.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

2.05
Market β
Mkt-RF
+1.218
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
-1.821
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
+0.152
Profit (RMW)
Robust
-2.208
Invest (CMA)
Aggressive
Alpha (annual): +107.15%
R²: 20.7%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

-174.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
12.24
Price/Book
28M
Avg Volume
$187.00
52W High
$63.80
52W Low
45%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.9B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding CRWV
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$2.9T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKW or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CRWV shares regardless of CoreWeave, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.9B of passive capital is structurally linked to CRWV through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in CoreWeave, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

CRWV Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
CRWVEpicenterVTIETFVUGETFVOETFTSLALow RiskAMDLow RiskCRCLHigh RiskHOODHigh RiskROKULow Risk
CRWV Price Drop (%)0

If CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CRWV. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

CRWV Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 17 CRWV shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
CRWV
Total Shares
448M
ETF Lock-Up
5.9%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
5.9%Locked Float

CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.6% of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and 2.6% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 26M shares (5.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

CRWV Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
CRWV
PRICE
$119.27
FLOOR (POC)
$79.20
STRENGTH
Medium
$67$737%$79POC 11%$858%$9210%$988%$1048%$1106%$1168%$1227%$119.27$128$1357%$141$147$153$159$165$172$178$184
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for CoreWeave, Inc. over the past year sits near $79.20 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $119.27 trades 50.6% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

CRWV Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does CoreWeave, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-7,251,000,000
EBITDA
$2.5B
FCF Conversion
-294%
Reinvestment Rate
394%
-294% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
0.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-9.5%

CoreWeave, Inc. converts -294% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 394% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1414$111.31$1,558.34
2026-05-138,039$107.75$866,202.25
2026-05-115,000$114.15$570,750
2026-05-08165,352$128.84$21.3M
2026-05-06316,693$127.89$40.5M
2026-05-0421,004$119.01$2.5M
2026-05-018,118$111.60$905,968.8
2026-04-302,188$114.19$249,847.72
2026-04-291$105.53$105.53
2026-04-2813,888$112.06$1.6M
2026-04-271,027$110.14$113,113.78
2026-04-2425,392$117.42$3.0M
2026-04-2317,282$122.54$2.1M
2026-04-2282,026$115.16$9.4M
2026-04-2114,499$117.43$1.7M
2026-04-2026,628$116.85$3.1M
2026-04-1717,893$119.56$2.1M
2026-04-1615,870$118.69$1.9M
2026-04-13170,448$102.00$17.4M
2026-04-1055,923$92.00$5.1M
2026-04-09262,671$88.90$23.4M
2026-04-08234,717$85.24$20.0M
2026-04-07222,285$80.94$18.0M
2026-04-0654,440$82.24$4.5M
2026-04-02887,732$78.44$69.6M
2026-03-25657$83.02$54,544.14
2026-03-1938,314$82.82$3.2M
2026-03-171$85.86$85.86
2026-03-1613,088$81.11$1.1M
2026-03-1221,319$81.96$1.7M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
VRT0.4550.491Moderate
NVDA0.4320.573Moderate
KYG2545710550.4250.453Moderate
CRDO0.4250.453Moderate
ORCL0.4250.557Moderate
PWR0.4090.482Moderate
COHR0.3970.402Moderate
TSM0.3940.487Moderate
RKLB0.3940.599Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare CRWV to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.