VONE(VONE)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio exhibits a pronounced tilt toward large-cap technology, which accounts for over one-third of the total allocation. This heavy concentration in the sector is supported by significant exposure to communication services and financials, creating a distinct divergence from a broadly diversified market index that typically weights industrials and healthcare more heavily relative to tech giants. Valuation metrics reflect this premium positioning, with a weighted price-to-earnings ratio near 28 times earnings and a price-to-book multiple exceeding 15 times book value, indicating the fund holds assets priced for robust future growth rather than current yield or low multiples.
Concentration risk is elevated due to top holdings representing more than one-quarter of the entire portfolio by weight alone, with semiconductor leader Nvidia commanding over seven percent of total assets. This dominance suggests that performance will be highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions favoring innovation and high-growth narratives; specifically, an environment characterized by strong corporate earnings expansion in the tech sector would likely support these elevated valuations. Conversely, a shift toward defensive sectors or a market rotation into value stocks with lower multiples could negatively impact this portfolio's relative performance given its lack of exposure to traditional staples and its heavy reliance on a few mega-cap equities.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 07:08:57.883428+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100The investment theme implied by the ticker VONE, which typically denotes a broad U.S. equity market exposure rather than a specific niche sector, aligns closely with the actual composition of the fund's portfolio. The top holdings are dominated by major technology and communication services leaders such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Broadcom, reflecting the significant weight assigned to these industries within the broader U.S. market index this ETF tracks. While these mega-cap names drive a substantial portion of the returns, their inclusion is consistent with a large-cap blend strategy rather than an indication that the fund has drifted from its intended mandate. The presence of diversified sectors like financial services, healthcare, industrials, and consumer staples further supports the interpretation that this vehicle serves as a comprehensive market proxy rather than a thematic play on any single industry vertical.
The sector breakdown demonstrates strong coherence with a broad-market approach, where technology accounts for nearly one-third of assets while other established pillars like finance and communication services maintain double-digit exposures. This distribution ensures that the fund remains genuinely differentiated from narrow-sector indices or concentrated growth strategies, as evidenced by the diverse representation across eleven distinct sectors including energy, utilities, and real estate. Although the top ten holdings represent a significant concentration of 35.6%, this level of weighting is characteristic of large-cap heavy broad market benchmarks where index weights naturally skew toward dominant players rather than reflecting poor thematic alignment or deceptive marketing practices. The portfolio structure effectively mirrors the aggregate performance of the U.S. equity landscape, offering investors exposure to both high-growth innovators and stable traditional industries in proportions that reflect their actual economic significance within the total market capitalization.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 21:59:05.536841+00
⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis
AI GeneratedThe newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of VONE highlight a convergence of systemic macro-level threats centered on regulatory expansion and operational cost escalation. A dominant theme emerging across these disclosures is the potential material adverse impact stemming from compliance with climate change regulations, which poses a direct challenge to financial conditions for major technology leaders like NVIDIA. Simultaneously, there is a pronounced exposure to evolving cybersecurity mandates and data privacy requirements that could significantly increase operational expenditures and constrain business agility. Furthermore, the specific mention of responsible AI usage regulations indicates that emerging governance frameworks are beginning to influence competitive positioning and cost structures within the artificial intelligence sector.
The concentration of these shared risks among the fund's largest positions suggests a high degree of correlated downside potential rather than isolated idiosyncratic events. With NVIDIA alone carrying substantial weight in each of these three categories, and similar regulatory pressures likely affecting peers such as Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta given their industry standing, the portfolio faces synchronized headwinds from external policy shifts. The fact that multiple top-tier holdings explicitly flag increased costs due to environmental compliance and data privacy adherence indicates that a broad tightening of global regulations could simultaneously erode margins across the fund's core technology exposure. This clustering of risk factors implies that macro-level regulatory actions in climate, cybersecurity, and AI governance represent a unified threat vector rather than diversified risks.
While systemic issues dominate the current disclosures, NVIDIA's specific 7.1% weighting amplifies its unique vulnerabilities regarding environmental compliance and AI regulation more significantly than any other single holding in this list. The explicit statement that adherence to data privacy requirements may affect business operations for such a large position underscores how regulatory changes could disproportionately impact overall fund performance if these mandates become stricter or more widespread. Additionally, the presence of traditional sectors like energy (XOM) and financials (JPM) alongside heavy technology weights means that while tech-specific risks are prominent, the broader portfolio remains exposed to varied macroeconomic conditions inherent in different industries.
Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 05:37:29.910775+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of VONE reveals a pronounced tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology comprising nearly one-third of the portfolio. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on capturing high-growth momentum and innovation premiums found in large-cap equities. The presence of significant positions in Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical sectors further reinforces this focus on companies driving digital transformation and discretionary spending trends. Conversely, defensive sectors such as Utilities, Real Estate, and Basic Materials represent a modest portion of the fund, indicating that capital preservation through low-volatility or income-generating assets is not the primary objective of this strategy.
Concentration risk appears elevated due to both sector skewing and top-heavy holdings within those sectors. The Top 10 concentration metric stands at 35.6%, driven largely by the dominance of mega-cap technology firms like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT in the overall allocation. This structure implies that a substantial portion of the fund's performance will be directly correlated with the stock price movements of these specific leaders rather than broad market diversification across all sectors. While Financial Services and Industrials provide some breadth, their weights are insufficient to fully offset the volatility potential inherent in such a concentrated technology exposure.
From a factor perspective, this allocation exhibits characteristics typical of quality and momentum factors but lacks explicit value or small-cap tilts given the absence of smaller holdings data and the heavy reliance on established giants. The limited representation in Energy and Healthcare suggests the fund is not seeking exposure to cyclical commodity recovery or defensive healthcare stability as primary drivers. Ultimately, the portfolio construction prioritizes capturing upside potential from dominant market players while accepting higher idiosyncratic risk associated with a narrow sector focus.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 22:03:51.192975+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VONE's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VONE's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares | $2.1T | 0.03% | 486 | 93.9% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 454 | 92.6% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 462 | 92.5% |
| VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF | $1.5T | 0.03% | 424 | 91.5% |
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | $640B | 0.09% | 423 | 91.3% |
94% of VONE's portfolio by weight is also held by VTI, which commands 203× more assets under management. When VTI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VONE's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVONE's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 98% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 80% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VONE collectively pay out 36% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 63% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVONE is up 27.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +38.9%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 11.0% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 78% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VONE's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VONE's analyzed weight, 78% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 22% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 74% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VONE has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.7% of the market capitalization of VONE's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 52 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. Technology | 7.10% | 32.4x | 4/9 |
| 2 | AAPL | Apple Inc. Technology | 5.95% | 37.7x | 8/9 |
| 3 | MSFT | Microsoft Corp. Technology | 4.60% | 26.8x | 5/9 |
| 4 | AMZN | Amazon.com Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 3.87% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 5 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc. Class A Communication Services | 3.41% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | AVGO | Broadcom Inc. Technology | 2.93% | 86.9x | 8/9 |
| 7 | GOOG | Alphabet Inc. Class C Communication Services | 2.75% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 8 | META | Facebook Inc. Class A Communication Services | 2.03% | 23.0x | 5/9 |
| 9 | TSLA | Tesla Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 1.64% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 10 | BRK.B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B Financial Services | 1.33% | 14.1x | — |
| 11 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. Financial Services | 1.22% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 12 | LLY | Eli Lilly & Co. Healthcare | 1.14% | 39.2x | 7/9 |
| 13 | XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp. Energy | 0.99% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 14 | MU | Micron Technology Inc. Technology | 0.88% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 15 | AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Technology | 0.87% | 172.6x | 7/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VONE’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | WMT | 0.87% | 714,125 | $94.2M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | WMT | 0.87% | 714,125 | $94.2M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | WMT | 0.87% | 714,125 | $94.2M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | WMT | 0.87% | 714,125 | $94.2M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | AMD | 0.87% | 264,336 | $93.7M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 40.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 7.10% | 3,841,611 | $766.7M |
| 2 | AAPL | 5.95% | 2,364,704 | $641.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 4.60% | 1,217,350 | $496.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 3.87% | 1,574,560 | $417.4M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.41% | 955,300 | $367.6M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.93% | 758,057 | $316.4M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.75% | 775,689 | $296.3M |
| 8 | META | 2.03% | 358,383 | $219.3M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.64% | 463,133 | $176.7M |
| 10 | BRK.B | 1.33% | 302,735 | $143.4M |
| 11 | JPM | 1.22% | 419,647 | $131.4M |
| 12 | LLY | 1.14% | 131,497 | $122.9M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.99% | 693,444 | $107.0M |
| 14 | MU | 0.88% | 183,399 | $94.8M |
| 15 | WMT | 0.87% | 714,125 | $94.2M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VONE Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VONE’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.