FMC Corporation (FMC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 2/9; Altman Z of 0.7 falls in the academic distress zone.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of FMC Corporation reveal severe capital allocation inefficiencies, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -27.9%, indicating the firm is destroying value relative to its cost of equity. This distress is driven primarily by a net margin contraction to -64.6% amidst an 18.3% revenue decline, which collapses DuPont ROE to -106.7%. While the Altman Z-Score of 0.7 signals elevated bankruptcy risk and the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 confirms deteriorating financial health, the Beneish M-Score of -3.97 suggests earnings are unlikely to be manipulated downward; rather, the negative profitability factor (RMW: -0.281) reflects genuine operational weakness within a sector that otherwise trades at an average P/E of 37.1x.
Valuation metrics further highlight the disconnect between current performance and historical norms, as the stock's pricing ignores its inability to generate positive returns on invested capital. The Fama-French Alpha of -111.55% annually underscores a significant underperformance relative to market benchmarks over the measurement period. Although the value factor (HML: 0.493) indicates a tilt toward undervalued stocks, this characteristic is currently outweighed by the extreme weakness in profitability and the negative spread between returns on capital and the cost of financing. The market appears to be pricing in continued operational struggles rather than an imminent turnaround, given that fair value models relying on sustainable growth would likely yield a significant discount from current levels if normalized margins were not assumed.
Insider activity presents a nuanced counterpoint to the broader fundamental deterioration, with $249,938 in net buying over the last 90 days suggesting specific management confidence despite public financial results. However, this limited insider flow does not yet offset the systemic risks flagged by the low Altman score and negative alpha. The combination of weak profitability metrics and a substantial gap between actual returns and required returns creates a high-risk environment where any recovery depends on a structural shift in margin expansion that current data points do not support.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedFMC Corporation is currently trading at $12.76 within the Basic Materials sector, presenting a snapshot where price action must be evaluated against its broader risk profile rather than isolated metrics alone. Without specific data on recent drawdowns or volatility indices, it remains unclear whether any observed momentum stems from robust fundamental shifts in agricultural chemicals demand or if it represents a fragile consolidation susceptible to sudden reversals. The absence of concrete trend lines or volume profiles prevents a definitive assessment of structural strength versus temporary market noise at this price level. In the context of risk dynamics, the current valuation suggests that capital allocation decisions hinge heavily on external sector catalysts rather than intrinsic technical fortitude. If recent price movements lack supporting volume confirmation or occur amidst elevated implied volatility, the trajectory may be prone to sharp corrections typical of cyclical materials stocks facing input cost pressures. Conversely, sustained movement above key psychological barriers could indicate emerging resilience, yet without corroborating data on earnings stability or inventory levels, such optimism remains speculative. Ultimately, the technical landscape for FMC appears ambiguous, offering no clear signal regarding whether current momentum is a sustainable trend or a precarious condition awaiting macroeconomic confirmation. Market participants must weigh the inherent volatility of the Basic Materials sector against any recent price appreciation to determine if the asset's risk-reward profile aligns with their specific tolerance thresholds. The interplay between potential drawdown risks and underlying fundamentals will likely dictate whether future price actions consolidate gains or reverse course, leaving the direction contingent on unfolding economic data rather
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | $0.0800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | $0.0800 | -86.2% |
| 2025-09-30 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-30 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-31 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-31 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-30 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-28 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-27 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-28 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-28 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-29 | $0.5800 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SLYV or DVY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FMC shares regardless of FMC Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $69M of passive capital is structurally linked to FMC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on FMC's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in FMC Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If FMC Corporation (FMC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FMC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 8 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
FMC Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 23 FMC shares, reducing daily market volatility.
FMC Corporation (FMC) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.2% of the SLYV (SLYV) and 0.2% of the iShares Select Dividend ETF (DVY). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 5M shares (4.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest FMC Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
FMC Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for FMC Corporation over the past year sits near $14.47 (32% of 252-day volume). The current price of $13.13 sits 9.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (32% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 33 | $14.79 | $488.07 |
| 2026-04-20 | 984 | $17.17 | $16,895.28 |
| 2026-04-16 | 584 | $17.42 | $10,173.28 |
| 2026-04-09 | 4,733 | $17.84 | $84,436.72 |
| 2026-04-06 | 341 | $17.75 | $6,052.75 |
| 2026-03-31 | 96,353 | $16.81 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-30 | 250 | $15.76 | $3,940 |
| 2026-03-25 | 301 | $14.83 | $4,463.83 |
| 2026-03-24 | 96 | $14.23 | $1,366.08 |
| 2026-03-23 | 48,729 | $13.09 | $637,862.61 |
| 2026-03-12 | 303 | $14.24 | $4,314.72 |
| 2026-03-10 | 397 | $14.12 | $5,605.64 |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,031 | $14.29 | $14,732.99 |
| 2026-03-03 | 910 | $14.40 | $13,104 |
| 2026-02-02 | 10,907 | $15.80 | $172,330.6 |
| 2026-01-29 | 2,025 | $16.02 | $32,440.5 |
| 2026-01-28 | 248 | $16.08 | $3,987.84 |
| 2026-01-22 | 3,966 | $15.91 | $63,099.06 |
| 2026-01-20 | 526 | $15.35 | $8,074.1 |
| 2026-01-16 | 51,221 | $15.48 | $792,901.08 |
| 2026-01-15 | 33,327 | $15.14 | $504,570.78 |
| 2026-01-14 | 16,225 | $15.31 | $248,404.75 |
| 2026-01-13 | 5 | $15.15 | $75.75 |
| 2026-01-05 | 17 | $14.34 | $243.78 |
| 2025-12-26 | 50 | $13.33 | $666.5 |
| 2025-12-18 | 7,781 | $13.78 | $107,222.18 |
| 2025-12-15 | 124 | $13.91 | $1,724.84 |
| 2025-12-12 | 1,506 | $13.66 | $20,571.96 |
| 2025-12-11 | 15,939 | $13.62 | $217,089.18 |
| 2025-12-05 | 4 | $13.29 | $53.16 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CMG | 0.528 | 0.637 | Moderate |
| IP | 0.511 | 0.555 | Moderate |
| CAH | -0.481 | -0.627 | Inverse / hedge |
| BAX | 0.472 | 0.538 | Moderate |
| CI | 0.446 | 0.505 | Moderate |
| DOW | 0.427 | 0.427 | Moderate |
| CTVA | 0.423 | 0.453 | Moderate |
| CE | 0.409 | 0.421 | Moderate |
| LYB | 0.396 | 0.357 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare FMC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.