Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicCMG trades at 29.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 35.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 6.6. DCF fair value of $28 implies 20% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedChipotle Mexican Grill exhibits robust capital efficiency, generating a 10.0% spread between its return on invested capital and weighted average cost of capital, which signals strong value creation potential relative to financing costs. This high-quality earnings profile is underpinned by an ROE of 54.3%, driven primarily by operational leverage through a net margin of 12.9% and asset turnover of 1.33x rather than excessive financial gearing, despite an equity multiplier of 3.18x. Fundamental integrity appears solid with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, while the Altman Z-Score of 6.5 suggests low bankruptcy risk; however, the negative Beneish M-Score of -2.86 indicates minimal earnings manipulation concerns.
Valuation metrics present a divergence between historical multiples and intrinsic value models. The current price-to-earnings ratio of 29.1x trades at roughly half its sector average of 57.0x, suggesting the market may be pricing in slower growth than typical peers despite the company's implied free cash flow expansion rate of 14.4% over ten years. A discounted cash flow analysis estimates a fair value of $29, implying approximately -9.9% downside from current levels if these long-term assumptions hold true. This valuation compression aligns with recent factor data showing significant underperformance in the momentum dimension, evidenced by an annual Fama-French alpha of -49.55%.
Risk assessment reveals a mixed picture characterized by divergent signals across different analytical frameworks. While profitability factors remain neutral at 0.037 and value tilt is negative at -0.116, insider activity over the last ninety days shows net selling totaling $2.57 million, which may reflect management's view on near-term liquidity or valuation levels. The combination of a high-growth implied trajectory against a discounting model that suggests slight downside creates an environment where future execution will be critical to validating current pricing assumptions.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 5% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.7% | 10.7% | 12.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $34 | $25 | $19 |
| 3% | $40 | $28 | $21 |
| 4% | $47 | $32 | $23 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $29.26.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $28 (-20.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 18% below its 5-year average P/E of 36.3x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is currently trading at $33.75 within the consumer cyclical sector. Without access to specific moving average values or Relative Strength Index readings in the provided dataset, a definitive assessment of whether price momentum aligns with long-term trends or short-term overbought/oversold conditions cannot be technically confirmed. The absence of comparative data regarding key technical indicators means it is impossible to determine if the current price action suggests strengthening bullish pressure or potential weakening downward force relative to historical averages. In isolation, a single price point does not reveal the trajectory of momentum or the strength of the trend line upon which traders often base their analysis. To evaluate short-term vigor, one would typically require RSI data to gauge divergence from neutral levels, while assessing position relative to moving averages demands knowledge of those specific threshold lines. Consequently, any conclusion regarding whether this asset is in an uptrend, downtrend, or consolidation phase remains speculative without the necessary supporting metrics. The available information highlights only the current valuation and sector classification for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., offering no insight into market sentiment derived from technical oscillators or trend-following tools. Readers must rely on external data sources to fill these gaps before forming a view on whether the stock exhibits characteristics of sustained growth or potential correction based purely on momentum dynamics.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MOAT or VOT, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CMG shares regardless of Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to CMG through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CMG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CMG Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 CMG shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.4% of the MOAT (MOAT) and 1.0% of the VOT (VOT). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 200M shares (15.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest CMG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CMG Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. over the past year sits near $32.77 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $29.26 sits 10.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
CMG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. converts 61% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 9.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-22 | 578,160 | $36.05 | $20.8M |
| 2026-04-20 | 918 | $35.83 | $32,891.94 |
| 2026-04-15 | 17 | $34.92 | $593.64 |
| 2026-04-13 | 146,438 | $34.09 | $5.0M |
| 2026-04-07 | 36 | $33.50 | $1,206 |
| 2026-03-24 | 7 | $33.36 | $233.52 |
| 2026-03-23 | 144,254 | $33.37 | $4.8M |
| 2026-03-20 | 65 | $32.94 | $2,141.1 |
| 2026-03-19 | 10,990 | $32.64 | $358,713.6 |
| 2026-03-18 | 1,200 | $34.41 | $41,292 |
| 2026-03-09 | 100,860 | $35.37 | $3.6M |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,156 | $37.06 | $42,841.36 |
| 2026-03-03 | 5,945 | $36.69 | $218,122.05 |
| 2026-02-20 | 2,336 | $37.97 | $88,697.92 |
| 2026-02-19 | 1,086 | $38.72 | $42,049.92 |
| 2026-02-18 | 504 | $37.88 | $19,091.52 |
| 2026-02-12 | 3,435 | $37.22 | $127,850.7 |
| 2026-02-09 | 36 | $39.39 | $1,418.04 |
| 2026-02-05 | 28 | $39.93 | $1,118.04 |
| 2026-02-04 | 75 | $39.17 | $2,937.75 |
| 2026-02-03 | 90,206 | $38.51 | $3.5M |
| 2026-02-02 | 1,122 | $38.87 | $43,612.14 |
| 2026-01-30 | 33,186 | $39.10 | $1.3M |
| 2026-01-27 | 633 | $39.72 | $25,142.76 |
| 2026-01-26 | 73 | $40.87 | $2,983.51 |
| 2026-01-22 | 4,570 | $40.72 | $186,090.4 |
| 2026-01-21 | 5,755 | $39.00 | $224,445 |
| 2026-01-20 | 423,907 | $39.96 | $16.9M |
| 2026-01-16 | 350 | $40.36 | $14,126 |
| 2026-01-15 | 162 | $40.59 | $6,575.58 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| FMC | 0.528 | 0.637 | Moderate |
| AMP | 0.480 | 0.528 | Moderate |
| CI | 0.446 | 0.562 | Moderate |
| BAX | 0.430 | 0.595 | Moderate |
| IP | 0.419 | 0.499 | Moderate |
| DRI | 0.413 | 0.475 | Moderate |
| LUV | 0.410 | 0.373 | Moderate |
| RS | 0.406 | 0.293 | Moderate |
| BEN | 0.404 | 0.390 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare CMG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.