Consumer Cyclical / Packaging & Containers

International Paper Company (IP)

$33.83
+0.42%
$17.7B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
0.90
Beta
5.53%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 1.1 DistressBeneish M -2.66 CleanROIC−WACC -16.6%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 1.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of International Paper reveal a severe capital allocation challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -16.4%, indicating that the firm is destroying value relative to its cost of equity. This negative return on invested capital drives a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -23.7%, primarily stemming from a net margin contraction to -14.9% despite robust revenue growth of 49.2%; the breakdown shows this loss is compounded by moderate asset turnover and leverage, rather than being solely an equity multiplier issue. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.66 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 1.1 flags significant distress territory, and a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 confirms deteriorating financial health, creating a stark contrast between top-line expansion and bottom-line erosion that undermines long-term shareholder value creation.

Valuation metrics appear detached from these fundamental realities, trading at an implied multiple far exceeding the sector average P/E of 42.1x given current profitability levels. Although no explicit DCF fair value is provided to benchmark against market price, the divergence between aggressive revenue growth and negative earnings suggests the market may be pricing in a normalization of margins that has not yet materialized. The stock exhibits characteristics typical of high-risk turnaround plays, where historical valuation anchors are rendered irrelevant by structural profitability issues, leaving investors exposed to significant downside if operational leverage fails to convert volume gains into net income.

Risk factors further complicate the investment picture; the annual Fama-French Alpha of -35.56% indicates substantial underperformance relative to a risk-adjusted benchmark over time. While the stock displays a positive tilt toward value (HML: 0.187) and robust profitability factor characteristics (RMW: 0.474), these factors are currently overshadowed by the negative alpha signal, suggesting that historical pricing models have struggled to capture its true risk profile. However, insider activity presents a counter-narrative with $4,008,251 in net buying over the last ninety days, which could imply management sees potential for future margin expansion or believes current market dislocation offers an entry point, though this sentiment must be weighed against the precarious Altman Z-Score.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price action for International Paper Company at $31.29 presents a neutral-to-bearish structural context where the security trades below its primary moving averages, suggesting that larger market participants may be positioned in a defensive or short-term accumulation mode rather than initiating aggressive upward momentum. The proximity of the 50-day and 200-day Simple Moving Averages indicates a period of consolidation where institutional flow is likely cautious, waiting for clearer directional confirmation before committing significant capital to either side. This alignment often reflects a market equilibrium where neither bulls nor bears are exerting sufficient dominance to force a breakout, resulting in a range-bound environment that typically limits volatility and profit-taking opportunities for large holders until a catalyst emerges. Volume trends accompanying this price stability further imply that institutional interest remains subdued or is being absorbed quietly without triggering the liquidity spikes usually associated with major position changes by fund managers. The absence of significant volume divergence suggests that while some trading activity exists, it lacks the conviction required to shift the balance of power decisively toward a new trend line. Consequently, larger players appear to be monitoring key support and resistance levels closely, potentially preparing for entry once price action breaks out of its current compression zone with accompanying volume expansion, though no immediate signal currently mandates a directional pivot in their positioning strategies.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.66
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

29.6%
Gross Margin
-14.9%
Net Margin
-7.4%
ROIC
9.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -16.6%— Negative spread.
+49.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-731.2%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-159.0M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-14.9%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.62x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
2.56x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-23.7%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

1.56x
Debt / Equity
1.28x
Current Ratio
-5.1x
Interest Coverage
118.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-0.59%
FCF Yield
65.0M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
+$4M
Net Buying
3
Buy Transactions
0
Sale Transactions
2026-03-12GUSTAFSSON PER ANDERSBuy$1M
2026-02-09GOUGHNOUR HOLLY GSold 2/8 qtrsGrant$295,084
2026-02-09SAAB JOSEPH RSold 2/8 qtrsGrant$1M
2026-02-09HAMIC WILLIAM THOMASGrant$2M
2026-02-09NICHOLLS TIMOTHY SGrant$2M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.37
Act: $0.23
-38.0%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.41
Act: $0.20
-51.1%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.59
Act: $-0.43
-173.0%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.25
Act: $-0.08
-131.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.4630
Latest Dividend
$1.85
2025 Total
0.0%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.86
2016
$1.77
2017
$1.82
2018
$1.91
2019
$1.94
2020
$1.92
2021
$1.85
2022
$1.85
2023
$1.85
2024
$1.85
2025
$0.93
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-22$0.46300.0%
2026-02-23$0.46300.0%
2025-11-14$0.46300.0%
2025-08-15$0.46300.0%
2025-05-23$0.46300.0%
2025-02-24$0.46300.0%
2024-11-15$0.46300.0%
2024-08-15$0.46300.0%
2024-05-23$0.46300.0%
2024-02-21$0.46300.0%
2023-11-14$0.46300.0%
2023-08-14$0.46300.0%
Stock Splits
2021-10-01: 1.056:12014-07-02: 1.014:11995-09-18: 2:11987-05-20: 2:11962-11-19: 1.02:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

40.7%
Annual Volatility
-0.58
Sharpe (1Y)
-37.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.19
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.716
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.187
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.474
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+1.321
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -35.56%
R²: 42.2%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

12.5
Forward P/E
1.58
PEG Ratio
1.20
Price/Book
7M
Avg Volume
$56.13
52W High
$29.26
52W Low
17%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.7B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding IP
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.2T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLB or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IP shares regardless of International Paper Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to IP through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in International Paper Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

IP Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
IPEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFLINLow RiskLINLow RiskNEMLow RiskNEMLow RiskNUELow Risk
IP Price Drop (%)0

If International Paper Company (IP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

IP Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 IP shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
IP
Total Shares
530M
ETF Lock-Up
16.6%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
16.6%Locked Float

International Paper Company (IP) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.1% of the State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and 1.0% of the VAW (VAW). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 88M shares (16.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

IP Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
IP
PRICE
$33.83
FLOOR (POC)
$44.95
STRENGTH
Medium
$30$31$32$34$33.83$35$368%$379%$398%$40$41$428%$44$45POC 12%$4610%$47$49$50$51$52$54
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for International Paper Company over the past year sits near $44.95 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $33.83 sits 24.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

IP Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does International Paper Company convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-159,000,000
EBITDA
$65M
FCF Conversion
-245%
Reinvestment Rate
345%
-245% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
-7.4%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-16.6%

International Paper Company converts -245% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 345% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-16.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1421,237$31.98$679,159.26
2026-04-22327$35.44$11,588.88
2026-04-156$36.54$219.24
2026-04-09254$37.07$9,415.78
2026-04-011,281$35.70$45,731.7
2026-03-31255$35.00$8,925
2026-03-302,432$35.45$86,214.4
2026-03-271,333$36.15$48,187.95
2026-03-2611,261$36.47$410,688.67
2026-03-2553$36.14$1,915.42
2026-03-2354,311$33.76$1.8M
2026-03-1763,610$37.54$2.4M
2026-03-1615$37.25$558.75
2026-03-1333,124$35.65$1.2M
2026-03-1235,864$38.66$1.4M
2026-03-0950,239$39.53$2.0M
2026-03-064,403$41.31$181,887.93
2026-03-0551,578$42.58$2.2M
2026-03-045,017$42.05$210,964.85
2026-03-034$42.89$171.56
2026-03-024,924$43.55$214,440.2
2026-02-233,124$46.87$146,421.88
2026-02-1879,550$49.05$3.9M
2026-02-17400$49.10$19,640
2026-02-137,961$49.17$391,442.37
2026-02-12172,463$49.19$8.5M
2026-02-1171,750$48.00$3.4M
2026-02-10289,013$47.50$13.7M
2026-02-095,172$46.58$240,911.76
2026-02-06133,644$44.37$5.9M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
SW0.7610.746High co-movement
PKG0.7000.689High co-movement
CSL0.6050.610Moderate
BAX0.5830.527Moderate
SWK0.5820.605Moderate
BLD0.5630.636Moderate
OC0.5440.592Moderate
AMCR0.5380.596Moderate
PPG0.5360.612Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare IP to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.