International Paper Company (IP)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 1.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of International Paper reveal a severe capital allocation challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -16.4%, indicating that the firm is destroying value relative to its cost of equity. This negative return on invested capital drives a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -23.7%, primarily stemming from a net margin contraction to -14.9% despite robust revenue growth of 49.2%; the breakdown shows this loss is compounded by moderate asset turnover and leverage, rather than being solely an equity multiplier issue. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.66 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 1.1 flags significant distress territory, and a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 confirms deteriorating financial health, creating a stark contrast between top-line expansion and bottom-line erosion that undermines long-term shareholder value creation.
Valuation metrics appear detached from these fundamental realities, trading at an implied multiple far exceeding the sector average P/E of 42.1x given current profitability levels. Although no explicit DCF fair value is provided to benchmark against market price, the divergence between aggressive revenue growth and negative earnings suggests the market may be pricing in a normalization of margins that has not yet materialized. The stock exhibits characteristics typical of high-risk turnaround plays, where historical valuation anchors are rendered irrelevant by structural profitability issues, leaving investors exposed to significant downside if operational leverage fails to convert volume gains into net income.
Risk factors further complicate the investment picture; the annual Fama-French Alpha of -35.56% indicates substantial underperformance relative to a risk-adjusted benchmark over time. While the stock displays a positive tilt toward value (HML: 0.187) and robust profitability factor characteristics (RMW: 0.474), these factors are currently overshadowed by the negative alpha signal, suggesting that historical pricing models have struggled to capture its true risk profile. However, insider activity presents a counter-narrative with $4,008,251 in net buying over the last ninety days, which could imply management sees potential for future margin expansion or believes current market dislocation offers an entry point, though this sentiment must be weighed against the precarious Altman Z-Score.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price action for International Paper Company at $31.29 presents a neutral-to-bearish structural context where the security trades below its primary moving averages, suggesting that larger market participants may be positioned in a defensive or short-term accumulation mode rather than initiating aggressive upward momentum. The proximity of the 50-day and 200-day Simple Moving Averages indicates a period of consolidation where institutional flow is likely cautious, waiting for clearer directional confirmation before committing significant capital to either side. This alignment often reflects a market equilibrium where neither bulls nor bears are exerting sufficient dominance to force a breakout, resulting in a range-bound environment that typically limits volatility and profit-taking opportunities for large holders until a catalyst emerges. Volume trends accompanying this price stability further imply that institutional interest remains subdued or is being absorbed quietly without triggering the liquidity spikes usually associated with major position changes by fund managers. The absence of significant volume divergence suggests that while some trading activity exists, it lacks the conviction required to shift the balance of power decisively toward a new trend line. Consequently, larger players appear to be monitoring key support and resistance levels closely, potentially preparing for entry once price action breaks out of its current compression zone with accompanying volume expansion, though no immediate signal currently mandates a directional pivot in their positioning strategies.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-23 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-14 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-15 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-23 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-24 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-15 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-15 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-23 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-21 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-14 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-14 | $0.4630 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLB or VAW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IP shares regardless of International Paper Company's individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to IP through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in International Paper Company to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If International Paper Company (IP) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Linde plc (LIN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IP. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
IP Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 IP shares, reducing daily market volatility.
International Paper Company (IP) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.1% of the State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and 1.0% of the VAW (VAW). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 88M shares (16.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest IP Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
IP Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for International Paper Company over the past year sits near $44.95 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $33.83 sits 24.7% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
IP Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does International Paper Company convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
International Paper Company converts -245% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 345% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-16.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 21,237 | $31.98 | $679,159.26 |
| 2026-04-22 | 327 | $35.44 | $11,588.88 |
| 2026-04-15 | 6 | $36.54 | $219.24 |
| 2026-04-09 | 254 | $37.07 | $9,415.78 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,281 | $35.70 | $45,731.7 |
| 2026-03-31 | 255 | $35.00 | $8,925 |
| 2026-03-30 | 2,432 | $35.45 | $86,214.4 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,333 | $36.15 | $48,187.95 |
| 2026-03-26 | 11,261 | $36.47 | $410,688.67 |
| 2026-03-25 | 53 | $36.14 | $1,915.42 |
| 2026-03-23 | 54,311 | $33.76 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-17 | 63,610 | $37.54 | $2.4M |
| 2026-03-16 | 15 | $37.25 | $558.75 |
| 2026-03-13 | 33,124 | $35.65 | $1.2M |
| 2026-03-12 | 35,864 | $38.66 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-09 | 50,239 | $39.53 | $2.0M |
| 2026-03-06 | 4,403 | $41.31 | $181,887.93 |
| 2026-03-05 | 51,578 | $42.58 | $2.2M |
| 2026-03-04 | 5,017 | $42.05 | $210,964.85 |
| 2026-03-03 | 4 | $42.89 | $171.56 |
| 2026-03-02 | 4,924 | $43.55 | $214,440.2 |
| 2026-02-23 | 3,124 | $46.87 | $146,421.88 |
| 2026-02-18 | 79,550 | $49.05 | $3.9M |
| 2026-02-17 | 400 | $49.10 | $19,640 |
| 2026-02-13 | 7,961 | $49.17 | $391,442.37 |
| 2026-02-12 | 172,463 | $49.19 | $8.5M |
| 2026-02-11 | 71,750 | $48.00 | $3.4M |
| 2026-02-10 | 289,013 | $47.50 | $13.7M |
| 2026-02-09 | 5,172 | $46.58 | $240,911.76 |
| 2026-02-06 | 133,644 | $44.37 | $5.9M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SW | 0.761 | 0.746 | High co-movement |
| PKG | 0.700 | 0.689 | High co-movement |
| CSL | 0.605 | 0.610 | Moderate |
| BAX | 0.583 | 0.527 | Moderate |
| SWK | 0.582 | 0.605 | Moderate |
| BLD | 0.563 | 0.636 | Moderate |
| OC | 0.544 | 0.592 | Moderate |
| AMCR | 0.538 | 0.596 | Moderate |
| PPG | 0.536 | 0.612 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare IP to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.