KTOS (KTOS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. Beneish M-Score of -1.88 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of the business reveal a precarious balance between revenue expansion and capital efficiency. While top-line growth accelerates at 18.5% year-over-year, profitability remains structurally thin with net margins compressing to just 1.6%, indicating that scale has not yet translated into bottom-line power. This inefficiency is underscored by an ROIC of merely 1.6%, which fails to generate meaningful value creation relative to the cost of capital. The DuPont decomposition highlights this dynamic: a robust gross margin of 22.9% suggests some pricing authority, but it is entirely offset by low asset turnover (0.55x) and minimal financial leverage (Equity Multiplier at 1.24x), resulting in an ROE of only 1.1%. Although the Altman Z-Score of 19.7 signals a strong safety margin against bankruptcy, the low Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates weak fundamental quality and potential deterioration in financial health over time.
Valuation metrics present extreme divergence from traditional benchmarks for profitable firms, reflecting market pricing on future growth expectations rather than current earnings power. A price-to-earnings ratio exceeding 541x implies that the stock is being valued almost exclusively as a high-growth story, decoupling share price from near-term cash flow generation. This disconnect suggests the market expects significant margin expansion or leverage increases to justify such multiples, yet the current trajectory shows no signs of improving operating efficiency or utilizing debt to amplify returns. Without evidence of accelerating earnings per share that can sustain these levels, the valuation appears detached from the underlying fundamentals provided by the reported margins and turnover rates.
Insider activity further complicates the risk-reward profile, as substantial net selling totaling $34.8 million over the last 90 days suggests management or major shareholders are reducing exposure despite the stock's high growth rate. While the negative Beneish M-Score of -1.88 points to low earnings manipulation risk, the combination of a weak Piotroski score and aggressive insider divestiture creates an environment where downside protection is limited by valuation fragility rather than operational resilience. The convergence of thin margins, inefficient capital deployment, and significant insider outflows warrants close monitoring as these factors may pressure future performance regardless of current revenue momentum.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price level of $52.09 for KTOS presents a specific context for analyzing institutional positioning, though the provided data lacks the necessary technical indicators such as moving average crossovers or volume trends to definitively characterize larger player behavior without speculation. In the absence of explicit signal lines like SMA interactions or comparative volume spikes, any assertion regarding whether institutions are aggressively accumulating or distributing would be purely conjectural rather than evidence-based. Typically, institutional footprints manifest through sustained price deviations from mean values accompanied by significant shifts in trading liquidity; however, with only a single snapshot of market pricing available, the structural relationship between long-term averages and short-term momentum remains undefined for this specific asset at this moment. Without historical data points to establish directionality or volatility regimes, it is impossible to discern if current holders are defending key support levels or if new capital is entering through breakout patterns that often precede sustained moves. The solitary price figure offers no insight into the flow of orders from market makers or large block traders who usually drive broader trend changes. Consequently, while one might hypothesize about potential scenarios based on general market dynamics applicable to similar financial instruments, attributing specific strategic intent to larger entities requires a richer dataset encompassing time-series performance and order book depth. Ultimately, the available information restricts analysis to the static state of the share price at $52.09, leaving the narrative of institutional positioning open to multiple interpretations until further technical confirmation emerges in subsequent trading sessions. Readers must evaluate
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKX or ARKQ, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell KTOS shares regardless of KTOS's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to KTOS through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in KTOS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If KTOS (KTOS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with KTOS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 14 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
KTOS Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 8 KTOS shares, reducing daily market volatility.
KTOS (KTOS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 7.8% of the ARKX (ARKX) and 4.9% of the ARKQ (ARKQ). Across 15 tracked ETFs, approximately 24M shares (12.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest KTOS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
KTOS Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for KTOS over the past year sits near $88.06 (10% of 252-day volume). The current price of $63.27 sits 28.2% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
KTOS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does KTOS convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
KTOS converts -134% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 234% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 1,372 | $56.99 | $78,190.28 |
| 2026-05-05 | 79 | $61.93 | $4,892.47 |
| 2026-05-04 | 100 | $62.05 | $6,205 |
| 2026-04-30 | 2 | $59.56 | $119.12 |
| 2026-04-27 | 8 | $61.26 | $490.08 |
| 2026-04-21 | 26,707 | $69.83 | $1.9M |
| 2026-04-20 | 7 | $70.99 | $496.93 |
| 2026-04-15 | 50 | $73.66 | $3,683 |
| 2026-04-06 | 20,086 | $67.31 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-27 | 2,068 | $75.86 | $156,878.48 |
| 2026-03-26 | 1 | $79.98 | $79.98 |
| 2026-03-24 | 95 | $83.69 | $7,950.55 |
| 2026-03-23 | 147,345 | $84.62 | $12.5M |
| 2026-03-20 | 196 | $92.78 | $18,184.88 |
| 2026-03-16 | 4,519 | $87.53 | $395,548.07 |
| 2026-03-13 | 7,700 | $89.46 | $688,842 |
| 2026-03-10 | 1,401 | $92.47 | $129,550.47 |
| 2026-03-09 | 14,699 | $87.00 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-06 | 14,170 | $85.54 | $1.2M |
| 2026-03-04 | 681 | $88.95 | $60,574.95 |
| 2026-03-03 | 140,726 | $90.72 | $12.8M |
| 2026-03-02 | 15,000 | $86.18 | $1.3M |
| 2026-02-27 | 10,152 | $92.14 | $935,405.28 |
| 2026-02-26 | 9,542 | $88.23 | $841,890.66 |
| 2026-02-23 | 4,000 | $96.08 | $384,320 |
| 2026-02-18 | 300 | $91.97 | $27,591 |
| 2026-02-11 | 1 | $93.48 | $93.48 |
| 2026-02-09 | 771 | $94.41 | $72,790.11 |
| 2026-02-06 | 478 | $85.25 | $40,749.5 |
| 2026-02-05 | 52,610 | $91.33 | $4.8M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| AVAV | 0.594 | 0.672 | Moderate |
| US0080731088 | 0.587 | 0.662 | Moderate |
| HII | 0.516 | 0.629 | Moderate |
| BWXT | 0.494 | 0.591 | Moderate |
| CW | 0.485 | 0.568 | Moderate |
| RKLB | 0.482 | 0.644 | Moderate |
| LHX | 0.480 | 0.545 | Moderate |
| ASTS | 0.455 | 0.591 | Moderate |
| VSEC | 0.452 | 0.505 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare KTOS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.