MXP554091415 (MXP554091415)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 41.7 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $134 implies 86% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a distinct dichotomy between current operational efficiency and historical valuation norms. The company demonstrates robust capital allocation with an ROIC of 18.9% significantly exceeding its WACC of 11.7%, generating a spread of +7.2% that indicates value creation potential, while the DuPont decomposition reveals strong margin drivers through net margins at 15.9% and gross margins at 38.3%. Financial stability is further underscored by an exceptional Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 41.7, suggesting minimal distress risk despite a recent shift in profitability factor (RMW) to -0.446. However, the valuation metrics tell a conflicting story; trading at 16.7x earnings represents a severe compression from the five-year average of 87.4x, implying the market has drastically repriced expectations for future growth despite revenue expanding by 30% year-over-year.
Valuation analysis highlights a substantial discrepancy between current pricing and model-derived fair value. With a DCF fair value calculated at $134 and an implied downside of -86.0%, the stock appears deeply undervalued relative to its intrinsic worth based on projected free cash flow growth assumptions of 44% over ten years. This divergence suggests the market is pricing in a scenario far more pessimistic than current operational metrics warrant, potentially reflecting concerns about sustainability or sector-specific headwinds rather than fundamental deterioration. The low multiple relative to historical averages indicates that significant mean reversion could occur if earnings power remains intact, yet the negative growth tilt in value factor (HML: -0.262) signals lingering skepticism regarding long-term expansion rates.
Risk assessment reveals nuanced exposure through Fama-French factors, where a high annual alpha of 44.53% contrasts sharply with weak profitability and growth factor scores. The combination of strong fundamental quality metrics like the Altman Z-Score against negative profitability adjustments creates an asymmetric risk profile that requires careful interpretation of whether current low multiples reflect temporary dislocation or structural flaws in the business model. Investors must weigh the compelling valuation gap and high ROIC spread against the market's evident loss of confidence, as indicated by the steep decline from historical P/E levels and adverse factor tilts.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 30% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.7% | 11.7% | 13.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $158 | $123 | $100 |
| 3% | $177 | $134 | $107 |
| 4% | $204 | $148 | $115 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $981.67.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $134 (-86.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | $6.5668 | +5120.0% |
| 2021-11-11 | $0.1258 | -96.7% |
| 2019-12-05 | $3.7800 | 0.0% |
| 2019-05-23 | $3.7800 | -44.8% |
| 2018-11-01 | $6.8500 | 0.0% |
| 2018-06-04 | $6.8500 | +25.9% |
| 2017-11-27 | $5.4400 | 0.0% |
| 2017-05-26 | $5.4400 | +540.0% |
| 2016-10-14 | $0.8500 | -43.7% |
| 2016-04-26 | $1.5100 | 0.0% |
| 2015-04-27 | $1.5100 | -20.5% |
| 2014-05-21 | $1.9000 | -74.1% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like GDXJ or GDX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell MXP554091415 shares regardless of MXP554091415's individual fundamentals. We estimate $903M of passive capital is structurally linked to MXP554091415 through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on MXP554091415's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in MXP554091415 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If MXP554091415 (MXP554091415) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (TW0002330008) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with MXP554091415. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
MXP554091415 Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 24 MXP554091415 shares, reducing daily market volatility.
MXP554091415 (MXP554091415) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.1% of the GDXJ (GDXJ) and 1.9% of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Across 7 tracked ETFs, approximately 16M shares (4.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest MXP554091415 Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
MXP554091415 Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for MXP554091415 over the past year sits near $759.59 (17% of 252-day volume). The current price of $981.67 trades 29.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (17% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
MXP554091415 Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does MXP554091415 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
MXP554091415 converts 60% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 7.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| GB00B2QPKJ12 | 0.567 | 0.559 | Moderate |
| GB00BL6K5J42 | 0.554 | 0.590 | Moderate |
| AU | 0.550 | 0.595 | Moderate |
| GB00BRXH2664 | 0.550 | 0.594 | Moderate |
| GFI | 0.546 | 0.635 | Moderate |
| NEM | 0.532 | 0.605 | Moderate |
| CDE | 0.490 | 0.576 | Moderate |
| RGLD | 0.487 | 0.521 | Moderate |
| HL | 0.470 | 0.497 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare MXP554091415 to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.