Cloudflare, Inc. (NET)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 8.2. DCF fair value of $10 implies 94% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics reveal a stark divergence between top-line expansion and bottom-line viability, characterized by negative returns on invested capital of -1.8% and an ROE of -7.0%. This poor equity generation is driven primarily by severe margin compression at -4.7%, despite robust asset turnover of 0.36x and leverage multiples near 4.14x; the DuPont decomposition indicates that profitability, rather than efficiency or financial structure, is the primary constraint on value creation. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals moderate financial weakness relative to strong peers, the Beneish M-Score of -2.95 suggests a low probability of earnings manipulation, lending some credibility to the reported losses which are likely structural given the current macro environment for cloud infrastructure.
Valuation metrics present a significant dislocation between market pricing and discounted cash flow models, with fair value estimated at $23 representing an 88.7% downside from current levels. This wide gap implies that the market is not currently discounting future cash flows heavily enough to align with the model's assumptions of only 44.4% ten-year free cash flow growth, a rate that appears aggressive relative to the company's present negative net margins and weak profitability factor score of -1.324. The stock exhibits distinct characteristics of a high-growth tilt within its style factors, evidenced by a value factor loading of -0.385, yet this momentum is counterbalanced by substantial insider selling activity totaling over $165 million in the last 90 days, suggesting internal stakeholders may view current valuations as elevated despite strong revenue growth of nearly 30%.
Risk-adjusted performance data indicates a notable anomaly with an annual Fama-French alpha of 16.42%, which historically signals that the asset has outperformed its factor-based benchmarks significantly over the measured period. However, this alpha must be weighed against the persistent weakness in profitability factors and the negative ROIC-WACC spread inherent to capital-intensive growth phases where reinvestment rates exceed returns generated on new assets. The convergence of aggressive implied growth assumptions, heavy insider distribution, and structural margin challenges creates a complex risk/reward profile where historical outperformance does not necessarily guarantee future alpha preservation as the company navigates its transition from negative earnings toward sustainable profitability.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 30% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 13.9% | 15.9% | 17.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $12 | $10 | $8 |
| 3% | $13 | $10 | $8 |
| 4% | $14 | $11 | $9 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $272.66.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $10 (-94.3%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like HACK or IWP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell NET shares regardless of Cloudflare, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to NET through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Cloudflare, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with NET. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 15 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
NET Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 11 NET shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.9% of the Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) and 2.2% of the IWP (IWP). Across 15 tracked ETFs, approximately 29M shares (9.2% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest NET Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
NET Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Cloudflare, Inc. over the past year sits near $196.47 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $272.66 trades 38.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
NET Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Cloudflare, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Cloudflare, Inc. converts 246% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-17.6%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 19 | $192.62 | $3,659.78 |
| 2026-05-13 | 64 | $186.79 | $11,954.56 |
| 2026-05-08 | 13,154 | $256.79 | $3.4M |
| 2026-05-07 | 46 | $248.59 | $11,435.14 |
| 2026-05-06 | 25,074 | $244.43 | $6.1M |
| 2026-05-04 | 27,017 | $217.50 | $5.9M |
| 2026-05-01 | 84 | $204.97 | $17,217.48 |
| 2026-04-27 | 200 | $207.07 | $41,414 |
| 2026-04-23 | 500 | $207.56 | $103,780 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,761 | $200.99 | $554,933.39 |
| 2026-04-14 | 3,039 | $184.02 | $559,236.78 |
| 2026-04-09 | 155,000 | $211.25 | $32.7M |
| 2026-03-30 | 50 | $203.02 | $10,151 |
| 2026-03-27 | 240 | $210.13 | $50,431.2 |
| 2026-03-23 | 555 | $215.42 | $119,558.1 |
| 2026-03-20 | 1,247 | $221.36 | $276,035.92 |
| 2026-03-17 | 44,771 | $207.33 | $9.3M |
| 2026-03-16 | 3,200 | $212.45 | $679,840 |
| 2026-03-13 | 1,215 | $212.11 | $257,713.65 |
| 2026-03-11 | 128 | $207.49 | $26,558.72 |
| 2026-03-10 | 2,400 | $201.48 | $483,552 |
| 2026-03-09 | 27,079 | $195.19 | $5.3M |
| 2026-03-05 | 8,685 | $185.89 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-03 | 9 | $181.02 | $1,629.18 |
| 2026-03-02 | 100 | $172.19 | $17,219 |
| 2026-02-19 | 3 | $191.44 | $574.32 |
| 2026-02-17 | 545 | $195.85 | $106,738.25 |
| 2026-02-05 | 77,246 | $166.88 | $12.9M |
| 2026-02-04 | 23,075 | $170.31 | $3.9M |
| 2026-02-03 | 32,436 | $182.42 | $5.9M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| CRWD | 0.642 | 0.694 | Moderate |
| SNOW | 0.580 | 0.607 | Moderate |
| ZS | 0.577 | 0.571 | Moderate |
| RDWR | 0.565 | 0.607 | Moderate |
| OKTA | 0.554 | 0.625 | Moderate |
| TENB | 0.528 | 0.569 | Moderate |
| S | 0.520 | 0.592 | Moderate |
| RBRK | 0.509 | 0.507 | Moderate |
| DDOG | 0.505 | 0.496 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare NET to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.