OC (OC)

$120.41
-1.80%
$10.1B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
1.35
Beta
2.35%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 2.0 Gray ZoneBeneish M -3.52 CleanROIC−WACC -7.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9. DCF fair value of $41 implies 65% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of this enterprise reveal significant distress, characterized by a negative ROIC-WACC spread and an ROE of -13.4% driven primarily by a contraction in net margins to -5.2%. While the gross margin remains robust at 28.1%, indicating potential pricing power or cost advantages in production, these benefits are entirely offset by operating inefficiencies that result in negative bottom-line earnings despite modest revenue growth of 2.6%. The DuPont decomposition highlights that asset turnover sits at a neutral 0.78x while equity leverage amplifies losses to 3.33x; this structural weakness is corroborated by a deteriorating Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, signaling declining financial health. Although the Beneish M-Score of -3.52 suggests low manipulation risk, it does not mitigate the underlying operational inability to generate positive returns on capital employed.

Valuation metrics reflect this fundamental deterioration, with current pricing implying a substantial discount relative to intrinsic value models. The DCF analysis places fair value at $42, suggesting the market is currently pricing in an implied free cash flow growth rate of only 7% over the next decade—a figure that appears inconsistent with the company's negative net income and weak ROIC profile. Consequently, current shares trade approximately 61.6% below this calculated fair value estimate. This wide disparity indicates that while the market may be anticipating a turnaround or restructuring, the immediate earnings trajectory does not support such optimism without significant operational leverage improvements to reverse the margin compression observed in recent periods.

Insider activity over the last ninety days remains neutral with zero net flow, offering no clear directional signal regarding management's confidence in near-term prospects. The convergence of negative returns on invested capital and a low Piotroski score presents a high-risk environment where even modest valuation discounts may not adequately compensate for the probability of further earnings degradation or balance sheet stress until margin recovery is demonstrated.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$120.41
Fair Value
$43
Implied Upside
-64.6%
$43IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)-10%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)10.0%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
8.0%annual FCF growth priced in at $120.41

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 3% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$56$35$22
3%$69$41$26
4%$89$50$31

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $120.41.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $41 (-65.1%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
2.0
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.52
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

28.1%
Gross Margin
-5.2%
Net Margin
2.8%
ROIC
10.0%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -7.3%— Negative spread.
+2.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-180.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
962.0M
Free Cash Flow
24%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-5.2%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.78x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.33x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-13.4%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.33x
Debt / Equity
1.26x
Current Ratio
1.4x
Interest Coverage
4.1x
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.00%
FCF Yield
1.1B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $2.87
Act: $2.97
+3.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $3.82
Act: $4.21
+10.3%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $3.72
Act: $3.67
-1.2%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.36
Act: $1.10
-18.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.7900
Latest Dividend
$2.76
2025 Total
+15.0%
YoY Growth
7 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.56
2016
$0.81
2017
$0.63
2018
$0.88
2019
$0.96
2020
$1.04
2021
$1.40
2022
$2.08
2023
$2.40
2024
$2.76
2025
$1.58
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-09$0.79000.0%
2026-01-05$0.7900+14.5%
2025-10-20$0.69000.0%
2025-07-21$0.69000.0%
2025-03-10$0.69000.0%
2025-01-06$0.6900+15.0%
2024-10-18$0.60000.0%
2024-07-15$0.60000.0%
2024-03-01$0.60000.0%
2024-01-05$0.6000+15.4%
2023-10-13$0.52000.0%
2023-07-14$0.52000.0%

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

34.3%
Annual Volatility
-0.37
Sharpe (1Y)
0.31
Sharpe (3Y)
-52.5%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-52.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

10.5
Forward P/E
1.51
PEG Ratio
2.62
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$159.42
52W High
$97.53
52W Low
37%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$763M
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding OC
0.13%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$608B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell OC shares regardless of OC's individual fundamentals. We estimate $763M of passive capital is structurally linked to OC through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on OC's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in OC to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

OC Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
OCEpicenterVBETFVIGETFVYMETFTOLLow RiskMODLow RiskCSLLow RiskBLDLow RiskTMHCLow Risk
OC Price Drop (%)0

If OC (OC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TOLL BROTHERS INC (TOL) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with OC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 17 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

OC Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 12 OC shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
OC
Total Shares
81M
ETF Lock-Up
8.2%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
8.2%Locked Float

OC (OC) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.8% of the XHB (XHB) and 0.6% of the MDYV (MDYV). Across 17 tracked ETFs, approximately 7M shares (8.2% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

OC Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
OC
PRICE
$120.41
FLOOR (POC)
$121.72
STRENGTH
Medium
$98$101$1046%$1077%$1107%$1138%$116$119$122POC 9%$120.41$1259%$128$131$134$137$140$143$146$149$152$155
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for OC over the past year sits near $121.72 (9% of 252-day volume). The current price of $120.41 sits 1.1% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

OC Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does OC convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$962M
EBITDA
$1.1B
FCF Conversion
91%
Reinvestment Rate
9%
91% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
2.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-7.3%

OC converts 91% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-7.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-113,008$121.67$365,983.36
2026-04-28386$125.52$48,450.72
2026-04-24553$125.66$69,489.98
2026-04-2021,834$122.84$2.7M
2026-04-01155$108.22$16,774.1
2026-03-261,835$107.97$198,124.95
2026-03-23157$99.96$15,693.72
2026-03-1717$107.90$1,834.3
2026-03-10100$107.25$10,725
2026-02-2739,145$122.28$4.8M
2026-02-251,111$126.63$140,685.93
2026-02-2320$132.71$2,654.2
2026-01-29915$120.57$110,321.55
2026-01-236,141$125.34$769,712.94
2026-01-2152,240$120.89$6.3M
2025-12-314$113.15$452.6
2025-12-2292$114.54$10,537.68
2025-12-1948$116.58$5,595.84
2025-12-042,051$114.12$234,060.12
2025-12-0159$113.24$6,681.16
2025-11-251,238$105.05$130,051.9
2025-11-19137$99.05$13,569.85
2025-11-13967$103.08$99,678.36
2025-11-0512,356$122.72$1.5M
2025-10-2424,865$128.63$3.2M
2025-10-231,078$126.98$136,884.44
2025-10-144,107$125.33$514,730.31

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
BLDR0.7170.705High co-movement
MAS0.7060.694High co-movement
ITW0.6910.615Moderate
PPG0.6700.642Moderate
BLD0.6630.661Moderate
SWK0.6530.608Moderate
KBH0.6500.647Moderate
TMHC0.6480.662Moderate
PHM0.6470.653Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare OC to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.