Communication Services

Roblox Corporation (RBLX)

$45.00
-4.26%
$33.8B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
1.50
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 2.0 Gray ZoneBeneish M -3.43 CleanROIC−WACC -33.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.0. DCF fair value of $38 implies 33% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of this entity present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While revenue growth remains robust at 35.8% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins of 78.1%, the company is generating significant losses with a net margin of -21.8%. This operational drag has resulted in an ROIC of -18.3% and a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -284.0%, driven primarily by high leverage (equity multiplier of 25.49x) rather than asset efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by the weak profitability factor score of -1.127. Despite these earnings deficiencies, qualitative indicators remain mixed; a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial strength relative to peers, while a Beneish M-Score of -3.43 indicates low probability of manipulation. However, the negative ROIC-WACC spread signals that current investments are destroying value rather than generating returns on capital employed.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in substantial future recovery, though this assumption carries significant risk given historical earnings performance. The DCF model implies a fair value of $68, representing 19.9% upside from current levels based on an assumed ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 12.4%. This forward-looking valuation stands in contrast to the company's recent profitability trajectory and relies heavily on the expectation that high-growth reinvestment will eventually translate into positive net margins and improved capital allocation efficiency. The stock appears to be trading at a premium relative to its current earnings power, with value neutral (HML: -0.082) but failing the profitability screen entirely.

Risk assessment highlights a concerning divergence between quantitative performance factors and insider behavior. Although the asset exhibits strong Fama-French alpha of 6.77% annually, suggesting superior risk-adjusted returns relative to market style factors, this is counterbalanced by aggressive insider activity. Over the last ninety days, insiders have executed net selling totaling $51.48 million, a signal that often precedes downside pressure or reflects reduced confidence in near-term prospects despite the strong alpha generation. The combination of weak profitability fundamentals and significant internal capital outflows suggests investors must weigh the potential for margin expansion against the possibility that management anticipates further value erosion before growth converts to sustainable earnings.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$45.00
Fair Value
$38
Implied Upside
-14.6%
$38IMPLIED FAIR VALUEFAIRLY VALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)27%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)14.8%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
21.8%annual FCF growth priced in at $45.00

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 36% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →12.8%14.8%16.8%
2%$44$36$31
3%$47$38$32
4%$51$41$34

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $45.00.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $38 (-33.5%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.0
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-3.43
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

78.1%
Gross Margin
-21.8%
Net Margin
-18.3%
ROIC
14.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -33.1%— Negative spread.
+35.8%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-13.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.4B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-21.8%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.51x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
25.49x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-284.0%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

24.49x
Debt / Equity
0.96x
Current Ratio
-25.7x
Interest Coverage
3.45%
FCF Yield
-802.2M
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$51M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
16
Sale Transactions
2026-02-27KAUFMAN MATTHEW DSold 4/4 qtrsGrant85,609 shares
2026-02-27BASZUCKI DAVID BRENTSold 4/4 qtrsGrant102,303 shares
2026-02-27CHOPRA NAVEEN KUMARSold 2/4 qtrsGrant73,299 shares
2026-02-27REINSTRA MARKSold 4/4 qtrsGrant96,790 shares
2026-02-27BASZUCKI GREGORYSold 2/4 qtrsSale$1M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.40
Act: $-0.32
+20.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.36
Act: $-0.41
-13.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.50
Act: $-0.37
+26.3%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.46
Act: $-0.45
+3.1%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

69.7%
Annual Volatility
0.20
Sharpe (1Y)
0.33
Sharpe (3Y)
-63.4%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-82.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.07
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.191
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
-0.082
Value (HML)
Neutral
-1.127
Profit (RMW)
Weak
-0.800
Invest (CMA)
Aggressive
Alpha (annual): +6.77%
R²: 20.9%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

-37.4
Forward P/E
8.18
PEG Ratio
84.65
Price/Book
11M
Avg Volume
$150.59
52W High
$40.15
52W Low
4%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.1B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding RBLX
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$2.8T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RBLX shares regardless of Roblox Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to RBLX through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Roblox Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

RBLX Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
RBLXEpicenterVTIETFVUGETFVOETFMETALow RiskTSLALow RiskSHOPLow RiskAMDLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
RBLX Price Drop (%)0

If Roblox Corporation (RBLX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RBLX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 15 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

RBLX Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 11 RBLX shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
RBLX
Total Shares
672M
ETF Lock-Up
9.3%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
9.3%Locked Float

Roblox Corporation (RBLX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.9% of the ARKF (ARKF) and 2.7% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 17 tracked ETFs, approximately 62M shares (9.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

RBLX Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
RBLX
PRICE
$45.00
FLOOR (POC)
$59.48
STRENGTH
Medium
$438%$45.00$48$54$59POC 9%$659%$71$76$82$87$93$98$1047%$109$115$120$1266%$1317%$137$142$148
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Roblox Corporation over the past year sits near $59.48 (9% of 252-day volume). The current price of $45.00 sits 24.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-143$41.96$125.88
2026-05-1294$41.31$3,883.14
2026-05-0410,750$45.13$485,147.5
2026-05-01369,028$55.26$20.4M
2026-04-204,200$60.34$253,428
2026-04-161,169$59.79$69,894.51
2026-04-152,135$58.30$124,470.5
2026-04-1427,250$57.66$1.6M
2026-04-078,566$57.20$489,975.2
2026-04-065,079$60.11$305,298.69
2026-04-02172$57.63$9,912.36
2026-03-242,489$56.84$141,474.76
2026-03-10211$62.65$13,219.15
2026-03-09520,302$63.53$33.1M
2026-03-0212,215$68.66$838,681.9
2026-02-182,171$63.00$136,773
2026-02-0920,409$66.42$1.4M
2026-02-05200,900$63.07$12.7M
2026-02-041,803$65.40$117,916.2
2026-02-02109,562$65.76$7.2M
2026-01-228$75.68$605.44
2026-01-215,108$78.84$402,714.72
2026-01-2047,100$87.28$4.1M
2025-12-263,077$81.88$251,944.76
2025-12-242,000$80.99$161,980
2025-12-231,810$81.98$148,383.8
2025-12-2286,633$81.94$7.1M
2025-12-15358$88.51$31,686.58
2025-12-082,000$96.28$192,560
2025-12-013,092$95.03$293,832.76

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
APP0.4340.483Moderate
META0.4330.395Moderate
SHOP0.3940.395Moderate
COIN0.3930.407Moderate
DASH0.3920.392Moderate
EME0.3900.448Moderate
BK0.3890.407Moderate
SOFI0.3880.425Moderate
MSFT0.3780.334Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare RBLX to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.