Roblox Corporation (RBLX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.0. DCF fair value of $38 implies 33% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of this entity present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While revenue growth remains robust at 35.8% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins of 78.1%, the company is generating significant losses with a net margin of -21.8%. This operational drag has resulted in an ROIC of -18.3% and a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -284.0%, driven primarily by high leverage (equity multiplier of 25.49x) rather than asset efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by the weak profitability factor score of -1.127. Despite these earnings deficiencies, qualitative indicators remain mixed; a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial strength relative to peers, while a Beneish M-Score of -3.43 indicates low probability of manipulation. However, the negative ROIC-WACC spread signals that current investments are destroying value rather than generating returns on capital employed.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in substantial future recovery, though this assumption carries significant risk given historical earnings performance. The DCF model implies a fair value of $68, representing 19.9% upside from current levels based on an assumed ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 12.4%. This forward-looking valuation stands in contrast to the company's recent profitability trajectory and relies heavily on the expectation that high-growth reinvestment will eventually translate into positive net margins and improved capital allocation efficiency. The stock appears to be trading at a premium relative to its current earnings power, with value neutral (HML: -0.082) but failing the profitability screen entirely.
Risk assessment highlights a concerning divergence between quantitative performance factors and insider behavior. Although the asset exhibits strong Fama-French alpha of 6.77% annually, suggesting superior risk-adjusted returns relative to market style factors, this is counterbalanced by aggressive insider activity. Over the last ninety days, insiders have executed net selling totaling $51.48 million, a signal that often precedes downside pressure or reflects reduced confidence in near-term prospects despite the strong alpha generation. The combination of weak profitability fundamentals and significant internal capital outflows suggests investors must weigh the potential for margin expansion against the possibility that management anticipates further value erosion before growth converts to sustainable earnings.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 36% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 12.8% | 14.8% | 16.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $44 | $36 | $31 |
| 3% | $47 | $38 | $32 |
| 4% | $51 | $41 | $34 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $45.00.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $38 (-33.5%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or ARKK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell RBLX shares regardless of Roblox Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to RBLX through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Roblox Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Roblox Corporation (RBLX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with RBLX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 15 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
RBLX Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 11 RBLX shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Roblox Corporation (RBLX) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.9% of the ARKF (ARKF) and 2.7% of the ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Across 17 tracked ETFs, approximately 62M shares (9.3% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest RBLX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 17 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
RBLX Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Roblox Corporation over the past year sits near $59.48 (9% of 252-day volume). The current price of $45.00 sits 24.3% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 3 | $41.96 | $125.88 |
| 2026-05-12 | 94 | $41.31 | $3,883.14 |
| 2026-05-04 | 10,750 | $45.13 | $485,147.5 |
| 2026-05-01 | 369,028 | $55.26 | $20.4M |
| 2026-04-20 | 4,200 | $60.34 | $253,428 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1,169 | $59.79 | $69,894.51 |
| 2026-04-15 | 2,135 | $58.30 | $124,470.5 |
| 2026-04-14 | 27,250 | $57.66 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-07 | 8,566 | $57.20 | $489,975.2 |
| 2026-04-06 | 5,079 | $60.11 | $305,298.69 |
| 2026-04-02 | 172 | $57.63 | $9,912.36 |
| 2026-03-24 | 2,489 | $56.84 | $141,474.76 |
| 2026-03-10 | 211 | $62.65 | $13,219.15 |
| 2026-03-09 | 520,302 | $63.53 | $33.1M |
| 2026-03-02 | 12,215 | $68.66 | $838,681.9 |
| 2026-02-18 | 2,171 | $63.00 | $136,773 |
| 2026-02-09 | 20,409 | $66.42 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-05 | 200,900 | $63.07 | $12.7M |
| 2026-02-04 | 1,803 | $65.40 | $117,916.2 |
| 2026-02-02 | 109,562 | $65.76 | $7.2M |
| 2026-01-22 | 8 | $75.68 | $605.44 |
| 2026-01-21 | 5,108 | $78.84 | $402,714.72 |
| 2026-01-20 | 47,100 | $87.28 | $4.1M |
| 2025-12-26 | 3,077 | $81.88 | $251,944.76 |
| 2025-12-24 | 2,000 | $80.99 | $161,980 |
| 2025-12-23 | 1,810 | $81.98 | $148,383.8 |
| 2025-12-22 | 86,633 | $81.94 | $7.1M |
| 2025-12-15 | 358 | $88.51 | $31,686.58 |
| 2025-12-08 | 2,000 | $96.28 | $192,560 |
| 2025-12-01 | 3,092 | $95.03 | $293,832.76 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| APP | 0.434 | 0.483 | Moderate |
| META | 0.433 | 0.395 | Moderate |
| SHOP | 0.394 | 0.395 | Moderate |
| COIN | 0.393 | 0.407 | Moderate |
| DASH | 0.392 | 0.392 | Moderate |
| EME | 0.390 | 0.448 | Moderate |
| BK | 0.389 | 0.407 | Moderate |
| SOFI | 0.388 | 0.425 | Moderate |
| MSFT | 0.378 | 0.334 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare RBLX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.