Communication Services / Electronic Gaming & Multimedia

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO)

$222.38
-2.03%
$41.6B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
0.97
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z 1.0 DistressBeneish M -4.98 CleanROIC−WACC -71.7%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of 1.0 falls in the academic distress zone.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Take-Two Interactive reveal a severe deterioration in capital efficiency, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -71.7%, indicating value destruction rather than generation. This negative return on invested capital is driven primarily by a net margin contraction to -79.5%, which, when combined with moderate asset turnover and leverage, results in a DuPont-decomposed ROE of -209.5%. Creditworthiness metrics further underscore these distress signals; an Altman Z-Score of 1.2 places the firm near bankruptcy territory, while a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 suggests significant financial weakness relative to historical norms. Despite a Beneish M-Score of -4.98 that technically flags low earnings manipulation risk, the operational reality is defined by sustained profitability erosion and negative returns on equity.

Valuation multiples reflect these underlying fundamentals rather than growth premiums, trading at a discount compared to the sector average P/E of 27.3x despite limited revenue expansion of only 5.3% year-over-year. The market appears to be pricing in substantial downside risk given that implied fair value models likely struggle to justify valuations when net margins are deeply negative and capital allocation yields -61.4%. This disconnect between modest top-line growth and collapsing bottom-line performance suggests the current price may already incorporate expectations of continued operational headwinds, yet no specific DCF fair value or explicit market pricing assumption is provided in the data to confirm a precise overvaluation gap.

Risk factor analysis highlights significant exposure to style factors that have historically underperformed; the stock exhibits negative Fama-French alpha of -10.31% annually and carries heavy growth tilt risks with an HML factor of -0.309. Compounding these structural headwinds is aggressive insider activity, characterized by $15,288,077 in net selling over the last 90 days, which often signals management concern regarding near-term prospects or capital needs. The Profitability Factor (RMW) of -0.873 further confirms that the stock has underperformed high-quality earnings peers during this period. Collectively, these metrics paint a picture of an asset facing substantial fundamental and behavioral headwinds without clear evidence of imminent turnaround catalysts in the provided dataset.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) is trading below both its 50-day and 200-day simple moving averages, suggesting a downtrend in the short term despite relatively balanced momentum as indicated by the RSI around mid-levels. The stock's beta of 0.96 indicates it has been less volatile than the broader market recently.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
1.0
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-4.98
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

54.4%
Gross Margin
-79.5%
Net Margin
-61.4%
ROIC
10.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -71.7%— Negative spread.
+5.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-19.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-214.6M
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-79.5%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.61x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
4.29x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-209.5%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

3.29x
Debt / Equity
0.78x
Current Ratio
-25.5x
Interest Coverage
-0.57%
FCF Yield
-3.0B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$15M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
10
Sale Transactions
2026-03-16SIMINOFF ELLEN FSold 4/8 qtrsSale$86,466
2026-03-09GORDON WILLIAM BINGHAMSold 1/8 qtrsSale$521,725
2026-03-05DORNEMANN MICHAELSold 1/8 qtrsSale$296,195
2026-03-03ZELNICK STRAUSSSold 5/8 qtrsSale$13M
2026-03-02GOLDSTEIN LAINIESold 8/8 qtrsSale$248,906

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.05
Act: $-21.08
-42929.2%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.72
Act: $-0.07
+90.2%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.62
Act: $-0.73
-17.1%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.39
Act: $-0.50
-28.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.0010
Latest Dividend
$0.00
2008 Total
DateAmountChange
2008-09-25$0.0010
Stock Splits
2005-04-12: 1.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

30.1%
Annual Volatility
-0.13
Sharpe (1Y)
-27.7%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.49
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.223
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
-0.309
Value (HML)
Growth tilt
-0.873
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.014
Invest (CMA)
Neutral
Alpha (annual): -10.31%
R²: 27.7%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

22.1
Forward P/E
3.04
PEG Ratio
11.87
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$264.79
52W High
$187.63
52W Low
45%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$7.5B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TTWO
0.11%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.9T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TTWO shares regardless of Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $7.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to TTWO through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TTWO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TTWOEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskMETALow RiskGOOGLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
TTWO Price Drop (%)0

If Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TTWO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TTWO Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 TTWO shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TTWO
Total Shares
186M
ETF Lock-Up
18.8%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
18.8%Locked Float

Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. (TTWO) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 5.2% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 2.0% of the VOX (VOX). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 35M shares (18.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TTWO Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TTWO
PRICE
$222.38
FLOOR (POC)
$239.71
STRENGTH
Medium
$190$193$197$201$205$209$213$217$220$2247%$222.38$2286%$2327%$2368%$240POC 11%$2448%$2476%$251$255$259$263
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. over the past year sits near $239.71 (11% of 252-day volume). The current price of $222.38 sits 7.2% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1322$225.99$4,971.78
2026-05-12206$221.47$45,622.82
2026-05-072$222.00$444
2026-05-0411$216.03$2,376.33
2026-04-27426$210.75$89,779.5
2026-04-172$213.93$427.86
2026-04-071$196.69$196.69
2026-04-0611,513$199.87$2.3M
2026-04-0219,646$198.20$3.9M
2026-04-013$197.50$592.5
2026-03-275$194.72$973.6
2026-03-251$191.37$191.37
2026-03-236$200.63$1,203.78
2026-03-1996$204.22$19,605.12
2026-03-1341$209.20$8,577.2
2026-03-102,134$214.63$458,020.42
2026-03-091,000$211.50$211,500
2026-03-0666$212.53$14,026.98
2026-03-059$215.77$1,941.93
2026-02-27383$213.29$81,690.07
2026-02-1950$199.13$9,956.5
2026-02-17100$193.67$19,367
2026-02-05830$200.76$166,630.8
2026-02-03141$221.81$31,275.21
2026-01-3034$239.27$8,135.18
2026-01-2841$245.52$10,066.32
2026-01-236,136$241.10$1.5M
2026-01-2210$238.23$2,382.3
2026-01-20151$240.14$36,261.14
2026-01-164$244.34$977.36

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
XYZ0.4570.445Moderate
ROKU0.4350.511Moderate
APP0.4140.574Moderate
SHOP0.3840.566Moderate
PANW0.3800.362Moderate
SNOW0.3800.470Moderate
ZS0.3670.386Moderate
RBRK0.3640.417Moderate
TOST0.3580.387Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TTWO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.