Block, Inc. (XYZ)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicXYZ trades at 59.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.7. DCF fair value of $28 implies 56% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of XYZ reveal a significant capital allocation challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -10.2%, indicating the company destroys value relative to its cost of capital despite maintaining a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a Beneish M-Score suggesting low earnings manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition highlights that this weak return on equity stems primarily from margin compression rather than leverage or turnover issues, as net margins sit at just 5.4% while asset turnover remains modest at 0.61x; furthermore, the Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places the firm in a zone warranting scrutiny for potential financial distress given its stagnant revenue growth of only 0.3%.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models, with the current P/E ratio of 28.5x trading at a premium to what appears warranted by fundamentals where DCF analysis implies a fair value 54% below current levels. This disconnect suggests the market is aggressively pricing in an implied free cash flow growth rate of 14.3% over ten years, a trajectory that contradicts the observed weakness in profitability factors and the negative Fama-French alpha of -15.86%. The combination of weak profitability signals (RMW factor at -1.036) and neutral value exposure indicates that current pricing may be detached from underlying operational realities.
Risk assessment is further complicated by recent insider activity showing $1,165,724 in net selling over the last 90 days, which often precedes or accompanies periods of reduced confidence among management regarding future prospects. While the Beneish M-Score offers some reassurance against accounting irregularities, the convergence of negative capital spread, substantial DCF downside, and insider outflows creates a skewed risk-reward profile where the probability of value erosion appears elevated absent a fundamental turnaround in margin expansion or asset efficiency.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 0% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 16.2% | 18.2% | 20.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $30 | $27 | $25 |
| 3% | $31 | $28 | $26 |
| 4% | $32 | $29 | $26 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $74.15.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=18.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $28 (-56.4%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 22% below its 5-year average P/E of 37.9x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or ARKW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell XYZ shares regardless of Block, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $5.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to XYZ through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Block, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Block, Inc. (XYZ) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with XYZ. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
XYZ Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 XYZ shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Block, Inc. (XYZ) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.9% of the ARKF (ARKF) and 2.6% of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 85M shares (15.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest XYZ Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
XYZ Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Block, Inc. over the past year sits near $64.50 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $74.15 trades 15.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
XYZ Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Block, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Block, Inc. converts 71% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.9%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 4,702 | $73.17 | $344,045.34 |
| 2026-05-11 | 838 | $74.85 | $62,724.3 |
| 2026-05-05 | 291 | $71.90 | $20,922.9 |
| 2026-05-04 | 92,008 | $71.81 | $6.6M |
| 2026-05-01 | 1,608 | $70.51 | $113,380.08 |
| 2026-04-29 | 1 | $69.54 | $69.54 |
| 2026-04-28 | 150 | $71.28 | $10,692 |
| 2026-04-27 | 8,929 | $71.63 | $639,584.27 |
| 2026-04-23 | 25,481 | $72.50 | $1.8M |
| 2026-04-22 | 127,467 | $71.75 | $9.1M |
| 2026-04-20 | 4,622 | $71.26 | $329,363.72 |
| 2026-04-17 | 188 | $68.67 | $12,909.96 |
| 2026-04-15 | 77 | $66.15 | $5,093.55 |
| 2026-04-14 | 67 | $64.22 | $4,302.74 |
| 2026-04-09 | 10,694 | $62.83 | $671,904.02 |
| 2026-04-07 | 3,192 | $60.68 | $193,690.56 |
| 2026-04-02 | 2,544 | $59.54 | $151,469.76 |
| 2026-04-01 | 4,782 | $60.18 | $287,780.76 |
| 2026-03-27 | 15,653 | $59.37 | $929,318.61 |
| 2026-03-25 | 60 | $59.89 | $3,593.4 |
| 2026-03-23 | 15 | $59.37 | $890.55 |
| 2026-03-19 | 8 | $57.84 | $462.72 |
| 2026-03-09 | 87,559 | $66.33 | $5.8M |
| 2026-03-05 | 5 | $65.24 | $326.2 |
| 2026-03-02 | 15,639 | $63.70 | $996,204.3 |
| 2026-02-25 | 106 | $51.00 | $5,406 |
| 2026-02-23 | 122,638 | $53.22 | $6.5M |
| 2026-02-19 | 5,832 | $53.60 | $312,595.2 |
| 2026-02-18 | 259,623 | $50.81 | $13.2M |
| 2026-02-13 | 42,806 | $49.09 | $2.1M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ROKU | 0.561 | 0.530 | Moderate |
| SHOP | 0.459 | 0.507 | Moderate |
| TTWO | 0.457 | 0.445 | Moderate |
| PYPL | 0.456 | 0.454 | Moderate |
| TOST | 0.453 | 0.500 | Moderate |
| AMZN | 0.448 | 0.425 | Moderate |
| ADSK | 0.445 | 0.587 | Moderate |
| XRAY | 0.424 | 0.510 | Moderate |
| ABNB | 0.421 | 0.421 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare XYZ to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.