Technology

Block, Inc. (XYZ)

$74.15
-2.56%
$45.1B
Market Cap
59.2
P/E Ratio
2.57
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 2.7 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.23 CleanROIC−WACC -9.9%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

XYZ trades at 59.2x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 2.7. DCF fair value of $28 implies 56% downside based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of XYZ reveal a significant capital allocation challenge, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of -10.2%, indicating the company destroys value relative to its cost of capital despite maintaining a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a Beneish M-Score suggesting low earnings manipulation risk. The DuPont decomposition highlights that this weak return on equity stems primarily from margin compression rather than leverage or turnover issues, as net margins sit at just 5.4% while asset turnover remains modest at 0.61x; furthermore, the Altman Z-Score of 2.6 places the firm in a zone warranting scrutiny for potential financial distress given its stagnant revenue growth of only 0.3%.

Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value models, with the current P/E ratio of 28.5x trading at a premium to what appears warranted by fundamentals where DCF analysis implies a fair value 54% below current levels. This disconnect suggests the market is aggressively pricing in an implied free cash flow growth rate of 14.3% over ten years, a trajectory that contradicts the observed weakness in profitability factors and the negative Fama-French alpha of -15.86%. The combination of weak profitability signals (RMW factor at -1.036) and neutral value exposure indicates that current pricing may be detached from underlying operational realities.

Risk assessment is further complicated by recent insider activity showing $1,165,724 in net selling over the last 90 days, which often precedes or accompanies periods of reduced confidence among management regarding future prospects. While the Beneish M-Score offers some reassurance against accounting irregularities, the convergence of negative capital spread, substantial DCF downside, and insider outflows creates a skewed risk-reward profile where the probability of value erosion appears elevated absent a fundamental turnaround in margin expansion or asset efficiency.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$74.15
Fair Value
$28
Implied Upside
-62.7%
$28IMPLIED FAIR VALUEOVERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)-5%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)18.2%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
15.2%annual FCF growth priced in at $74.15

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 0% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →16.2%18.2%20.2%
2%$30$27$25
3%$31$28$26
4%$32$29$26

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $74.15.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=18.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $28 (-56.4%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

59.2x
XYZ P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
37.9x
5Y Avg P/E
-9%
vs Sector

Currently trading 22% below its 5-year average P/E of 37.9x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.7
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.23
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

42.8%
Gross Margin
5.4%
Net Margin
8.3%
ROIC
18.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -9.9%— Negative spread.
+0.3%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-54.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
2.4B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

5.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.61x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.78x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
5.9%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.78x
Debt / Equity
2.20x
Current Ratio
-1.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
7.33%
FCF Yield
3.4B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$1M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
7
Sale Transactions
2026-03-03JENNINGS OWEN BRITTONSold 5/7 qtrsSale$225,423
2026-02-24GRASSADONIA BRIANSold 7/7 qtrsSale$517,450
2026-01-06GRASSADONIA BRIANSold 7/7 qtrsSale$202,286
2026-01-02JENNINGS OWEN BRITTONSold 5/7 qtrsSale$52,592
2026-01-02AHUJA AMRITASold 7/7 qtrsSale$70,442

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.92
Act: $0.56
-38.9%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.66
Act: $0.62
-5.9%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.66
Act: $0.54
-18.1%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.65
Act: $0.65
+0.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

60.1%
Annual Volatility
0.43
Sharpe (1Y)
0.12
Sharpe (3Y)
-53.0%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-86.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.56
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.490
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.024
Value (HML)
Neutral
-1.036
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.108
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -15.86%
R²: 36.6%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

15.2
Forward P/E
0.83
PEG Ratio
2.05
Price/Book
7M
Avg Volume
$82.50
52W High
$48.21
52W Low
76%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$5.6B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding XYZ
0.09%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.5T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ARKF or ARKW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell XYZ shares regardless of Block, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $5.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to XYZ through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Block, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

XYZ Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
XYZEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFTSLALow RiskSHOPLow RiskAMDLow RiskHOODHigh RiskCOINLow Risk
XYZ Price Drop (%)0

If Block, Inc. (XYZ) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with XYZ. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

XYZ Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 XYZ shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
XYZ
Total Shares
535M
ETF Lock-Up
15.9%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
15.9%Locked Float

Block, Inc. (XYZ) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.9% of the ARKF (ARKF) and 2.6% of the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 85M shares (15.9% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

XYZ Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
XYZ
PRICE
$74.15
FLOOR (POC)
$64.50
STRENGTH
Medium
$49$51$52$54$56$58$59$618%$638%$65POC 12%$668%$68$70$71$73$757%$74.15$779%$789%$806%$82
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for Block, Inc. over the past year sits near $64.50 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $74.15 trades 15.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

XYZ Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Block, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$2.4B
EBITDA
$3.4B
FCF Conversion
71%
Reinvestment Rate
29%
71% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
8.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-9.9%

Block, Inc. converts 71% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.9%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-124,702$73.17$344,045.34
2026-05-11838$74.85$62,724.3
2026-05-05291$71.90$20,922.9
2026-05-0492,008$71.81$6.6M
2026-05-011,608$70.51$113,380.08
2026-04-291$69.54$69.54
2026-04-28150$71.28$10,692
2026-04-278,929$71.63$639,584.27
2026-04-2325,481$72.50$1.8M
2026-04-22127,467$71.75$9.1M
2026-04-204,622$71.26$329,363.72
2026-04-17188$68.67$12,909.96
2026-04-1577$66.15$5,093.55
2026-04-1467$64.22$4,302.74
2026-04-0910,694$62.83$671,904.02
2026-04-073,192$60.68$193,690.56
2026-04-022,544$59.54$151,469.76
2026-04-014,782$60.18$287,780.76
2026-03-2715,653$59.37$929,318.61
2026-03-2560$59.89$3,593.4
2026-03-2315$59.37$890.55
2026-03-198$57.84$462.72
2026-03-0987,559$66.33$5.8M
2026-03-055$65.24$326.2
2026-03-0215,639$63.70$996,204.3
2026-02-25106$51.00$5,406
2026-02-23122,638$53.22$6.5M
2026-02-195,832$53.60$312,595.2
2026-02-18259,623$50.81$13.2M
2026-02-1342,806$49.09$2.1M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
ROKU0.5610.530Moderate
SHOP0.4590.507Moderate
TTWO0.4570.445Moderate
PYPL0.4560.454Moderate
TOST0.4530.500Moderate
AMZN0.4480.425Moderate
ADSK0.4450.587Moderate
XRAY0.4240.510Moderate
ABNB0.4210.421Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare XYZ to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.