Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAMZN trades at 31.7x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 35.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 5.5. DCF fair value of $7 implies 97% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of the entity reveal a capital allocation profile where returns on invested capital barely outpace the cost of equity, resulting in a negligible spread of 0.1%. Despite this tight margin between return and risk premium, DuPont decomposition attributes an ROE of 18.9% primarily to operational efficiency rather than financial leverage, driven by robust asset turnover of 0.88x and healthy net margins at 10.8%, while the equity multiplier remains conservative at 1.99x. Creditworthiness appears stable with an Altman Z-Score of 5.0, suggesting low bankruptcy risk, yet earnings quality indicators present a mixed picture; the company maintains a strong Beneish M-Score of -2.59 indicating minimal manipulation concerns, but its Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 reflects moderate financial strength without recent significant improvements in profitability or leverage ratios.
Valuation metrics suggest a divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from cash flow assumptions. The stock trades at a P/E multiple of 29.3x, which sits approximately 22% above its five-year historical average but remains significantly discounted relative to the sector peer group mean of 57.0x. However, discounting future free cash flows under current parameters yields a fair value estimate that implies substantial downside potential, creating a stark contrast with the growth narrative embedded in the market's pricing for an implied ten-year FCF expansion rate of 50%. This valuation gap indicates that while the multiple is compressed compared to peers and historical norms, the underlying model assumptions required to justify current prices demand exceptionally high sustained growth execution.
Risk factors further complicate the investment thesis through behavioral signals and factor exposures. Recent insider activity over the last ninety days shows net selling totaling nearly $15 million, a delta that often precedes broader market skepticism regarding near-term catalysts or valuation levels. From an asset pricing perspective, the stock exhibits characteristics of a growth tilt with a negative value factor exposure of -0.336, while its profitability alpha remains neutral at 0.032 annually and Fama-French alpha is modestly positive at 0.31%. Collectively, these data points portray an entity with solid operational fundamentals operating under tight capital return constraints, currently priced for aggressive growth that may not align with conservative intrinsic valuations or insider sentiment.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 12% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.1% | 13.1% | 15.1% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $8 | $7 | $6 |
| 3% | $8 | $7 | $6 |
| 4% | $9 | $7 | $6 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $256.52.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.1%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $7 (-97.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 29% above its 5-year average P/E of 25.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price action for Amazon.com, Inc. at $264.14 suggests a specific market context where institutional positioning can be inferred through the interaction of moving averages and volume dynamics. While raw crossover signals between short-term and long-term Simple Moving Averages are not explicitly detailed in the provided snapshot, such technical configurations typically serve as proxies for shifting sentiment among larger capital allocators. When these indicators align, they often reflect a consensus on trend direction that institutional players monitor closely to gauge momentum shifts without necessarily committing immediate liquidity. Volume trends accompanying price movements offer further insight into the intensity of this positioning. Elevated volume during upward moves may indicate active accumulation by sophisticated market participants, whereas declining volume on rallies could suggest waning interest from these larger entities. The sector classification as Consumer Cyclical adds a layer of complexity, implying that institutional behavior here is likely sensitive to broader macroeconomic indicators affecting discretionary spending patterns. Consequently, the interplay between price levels and trading activity provides a window into how major funds might be adjusting their exposure based on evolving economic data rather than isolated stock-specific news. Ultimately, this technical snapshot presents a scenario where larger players appear engaged in assessing trend validity through established analytical frameworks. The absence of definitive directional commands within these indicators means that institutional behavior remains interpretative; traders observe whether price consolidations or breakouts align with volume profiles to deduce potential future trajectories. This synthesis allows market observers to evaluate the strength of underlying support and resistance levels without prescribing specific actions, leaving the final
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
SEC Filings & Material Events
Significant news
Full financial overview
Significant news
Significant news
Latest earnings
10-K Risk Factor Expansion
Word count of Item 1A (Risk Factors) across annual filings. Rising counts often signal new regulatory, competitive, or operational risks.
Smart Money Flow
Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares Change | % Change | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | -96,700 | -43.6% | Decreased |
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | +730,245 | +192.4% | Increased |
| Tiger Global | 2026-Q1 | -11,379 | -0.1% | Decreased |
| Soros Fund Management | 2026-Q1 | +1,645,789 | +548.6% | Increased |
| Druckenmiller (Duquesne) | 2026-Q1 | +100,000 | +100.0% | Increased |
| Appaloosa Management | 2026-Q1 | +2,140,609 | +98.2% | Increased |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 2026-Q1 | -2,276,000 | -100.0% | Exited |
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | -906,200 | -4.8% | Decreased |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-Q1 | -890,926 | -100.0% | Exited |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-Q1 | +2,440,457 | +125.3% | Increased |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | -43,600 | -40.0% | Decreased |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | -374,211 | -11.8% | Decreased |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLY or VCR, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AMZN shares regardless of Amazon.com, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $283.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to AMZN through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Amazon.com, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AMZN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 49 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AMZN Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 AMZN shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 27.9% of the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY) and 24.4% of the VCR (VCR). Across 39 tracked ETFs, approximately 1135M shares (10.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest AMZN Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 39 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
AMZN Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Amazon.com, Inc. over the past year sits near $222.84 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $256.52 trades 15.1% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
AMZN Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Amazon.com, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Amazon.com, Inc. converts 5% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 95% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 473 | $270.13 | $127,771.49 |
| 2026-05-12 | 5,688 | $268.99 | $1.5M |
| 2026-05-11 | 585 | $272.68 | $159,517.8 |
| 2026-05-08 | 1,104 | $271.17 | $299,371.68 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,100 | $274.99 | $302,489 |
| 2026-05-05 | 516 | $272.05 | $140,377.8 |
| 2026-05-04 | 19,675 | $268.26 | $5.3M |
| 2026-05-01 | 53,397 | $265.06 | $14.2M |
| 2026-04-30 | 607,971 | $263.04 | $159.9M |
| 2026-04-29 | 605 | $259.70 | $157,118.5 |
| 2026-04-28 | 13,500 | $261.12 | $3.5M |
| 2026-04-27 | 2 | $263.99 | $527.98 |
| 2026-04-23 | 4,221 | $255.36 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-22 | 3,220 | $249.91 | $804,710.2 |
| 2026-04-21 | 4,516 | $248.28 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-20 | 65,375 | $250.56 | $16.4M |
| 2026-04-17 | 1,300 | $249.70 | $324,610 |
| 2026-04-16 | 9,502 | $248.50 | $2.4M |
| 2026-04-14 | 1,300 | $239.89 | $311,857 |
| 2026-04-13 | 43,701 | $238.38 | $10.4M |
| 2026-04-10 | 1,848 | $233.65 | $431,785.2 |
| 2026-04-09 | 3,300 | $221.25 | $730,125 |
| 2026-04-08 | 105,024 | $213.77 | $22.5M |
| 2026-04-07 | 4,336 | $212.79 | $922,657.44 |
| 2026-04-06 | 3,150 | $209.77 | $660,775.5 |
| 2026-04-02 | 10,050 | $210.57 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-01 | 3,569 | $208.27 | $743,315.63 |
| 2026-03-31 | 8,825 | $200.95 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-30 | 1 | $199.34 | $199.34 |
| 2026-03-24 | 726 | $210.14 | $152,561.64 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)
Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares | Value ($K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | 18,049,800 | $3,759,231,846K |
| Tiger Global | 2026-Q1 | 10,000,000 | $2,082,700,000K |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-Q1 | 4,388,711 | $914,036,840K |
| Appaloosa Management | 2026-Q1 | 4,320,000 | $899,726,400K |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | 2,806,889 | $584,590,772K |
| Soros Fund Management | 2026-Q1 | 1,945,789 | $405,249,475K |
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | 1,109,840 | $231,146,377K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | 125,100 | $26,054,577K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | 65,400 | $13,620,858K |
| Druckenmiller (Duquesne) | 2026-Q1 | 200,000 | $41,654K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | 18,956,000 | $4,375,423,920K |
| Tiger Global | 2025-Q4 | 10,011,379 | $2,310,826,501K |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q4 | 3,181,100 | $734,261,502K |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 2025-Q4 | 2,276,000 | $525,346,320K |
| Appaloosa Management | 2025-Q4 | 2,179,391 | $503,047,031K |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| META | 0.533 | 0.447 | Moderate |
| ROKU | 0.532 | 0.489 | Moderate |
| SHOP | 0.484 | 0.455 | Moderate |
| ABNB | 0.464 | 0.394 | Moderate |
| XYZ | 0.448 | 0.425 | Moderate |
| CVNA | 0.429 | 0.430 | Moderate |
| GOOGL | 0.428 | 0.437 | Moderate |
| SOFI | 0.427 | 0.407 | Moderate |
| COF | 0.426 | 0.345 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare AMZN to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.