IYC(IYC)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe iShares U.S. Consumer ETF maintains a distinct market positioning characterized by a heavy concentration within the consumer cyclical sector, which accounts for nearly one-third of its total assets under management. This exposure is driven primarily by significant weightings in major e-commerce and retail entities like Amazon and Tesla, combined with substantial stakes in home improvement and dining sectors represented by Home Depot and McDonald's. While the fund does hold positions within defensive industries through Walmart and Costco, these allocations constitute a minority share of the portfolio compared to cyclical peers. The communication services sector provides additional diversification via Netflix and Disney, though it remains a relatively minor component relative to the dominant retail focus.
Geographically, the structure implies an exclusively domestic U.S.-centric tilt given that all top holdings are American-based companies operating primarily within the United States market. This geographic specificity results in high sensitivity to local consumer spending patterns rather than global economic shifts affecting international markets. The portfolio exhibits notable concentration risk at the individual stock level; for instance, Amazon alone represents nearly 15% of total assets, while Tesla and Walmart collectively add another significant portion of exposure. Such a top-heavy composition suggests that performance will be disproportionately influenced by the valuation trajectories and earnings reports of these largest constituents rather than broad-based sector movements.
Quantitatively, the fund's profile reflects an aggressive stance toward growth-oriented consumer names rather than a balanced approach across all retail sub-sectors. The lack of meaningful exposure to technology beyond Uber indicates a deliberate avoidance of heavy hardware or software weighting despite the tech-enabled nature of many holdings. With over one billion dollars in assets, the ETF offers investors direct access to this specific blend of cyclical and defensive consumer names without requiring individual stock selection within these sectors. However, the tight clustering around a few large-cap retailers means that volatility in those specific stocks will likely translate directly into portfolio fluctuations with limited buffering from other asset classes or regions.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-19 14:37:44.680899+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 75/100The investment theme implied by the name "IYC" suggests a focus on internet-related companies, yet the actual holdings reveal a portfolio heavily weighted toward broader consumer and retail sectors. While significant positions in Amazon, Tesla, Netflix, Uber, and Disney align with digital or e-commerce activities, substantial allocations to Walmart, Costco, Home Depot, McDonald's, and TJX introduce elements that are less directly tied to internet infrastructure or pure-play technology services. This mix indicates that while the fund captures major beneficiaries of online growth, it also relies on established physical retailers and service providers whose primary value drivers may not be exclusively digital transformation.
Sector coherence presents a mixed picture where consumer cyclicals dominate at 33%, followed by defensive and communication services sectors comprising less than 16% combined. The top ten holdings concentrate over half the portfolio's weight, creating a profile that resembles a large-cap growth index rather than a narrowly defined thematic basket. Although specific names like Netflix and Uber provide internet exposure, their relatively small weights alongside massive consumer staples suggest the fund may be leveraging broad market leaders to stabilize returns while maintaining an internet-centric label. The sector distribution lacks the exclusivity expected of a pure-play theme, blending high-growth tech adjacencies with traditional retail stability in a manner that differentiates it from a standard technology index but dilutes strict thematic purity.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 23:18:30.61178+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of IYC presents a distinctively skewed profile dominated by consumer cyclicals, which account for nearly one-third of the portfolio. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on companies whose performance is tightly correlated with discretionary spending and broader economic expansion rather than defensive stability or growth in technology infrastructure. The presence of major retailers and automakers within this category reinforces a focus on firms directly exposed to consumer demand fluctuations, indicating that the fund's returns will likely mirror the cyclical nature of retail sales and automotive consumption patterns during various phases of the business cycle.
A significant concentration risk emerges from both sectoral and individual stock levels, as evidenced by the top ten holdings representing over half of the total assets under management. The single largest position alone approaches fifteen percent of the portfolio, while a mere five companies drive more than thirty-three percent of the fund's exposure. This lack of diversification implies that adverse events specific to any one holding or sub-sector could disproportionately impact overall performance, creating volatility that exceeds what might be expected from a broadly diversified consumer sector ETF. The minimal allocation to technology and communication services further narrows the scope of growth drivers available within the portfolio, limiting potential upside from sectors often associated with long-term digital transformation trends while simultaneously reducing exposure to those specific innovation cycles.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 21:10:58.748701+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share IYC's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of IYC's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | $640B | 0.09% | 10 | 51.4% |
| SPLGSPLG | $97B | — | 10 | 51.4% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 10 | 51.4% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 10 | 51.4% |
| RSPRSP | $83B | — | 10 | 51.4% |
51% of IYC's portfolio by weight is also held by SPY, which commands 559× more assets under management. When SPY receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IYC's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIYC's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 51% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside IYC collectively pay out 47% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 22% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryIYC is up 3.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +15.5%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 11.6% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 51% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of IYC's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of IYC's analyzed weight, 74% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 26% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 51% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
HIGHAMZN at 14.9% contributes an estimated 57% of portfolio variance.IYC holds 10 stocks but behaves like an 26-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
IYC has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.9% of the market capitalization of IYC's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 49 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMZN | Amazon.com Inc Consumer Cyclical | 14.94% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 2 | TSLA | Tesla Inc Consumer Cyclical | 7.82% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 3 | WMT | Walmart Inc Consumer Defensive | 4.59% | 40.8x | 7/9 |
| 4 | COST | Costco Wholesale Corp Consumer Defensive | 4.26% | 49.8x | 6/9 |
| 5 | NFLX | Netflix Inc Communication Services | 4.18% | 27.7x | 6/9 |
| 6 | HD | The Home Depot Inc Consumer Cyclical | 3.91% | 22.5x | 4/9 |
| 7 | MCD | McDonald's Corp Consumer Cyclical | 3.43% | 23.0x | 6/9 |
| 8 | DIS | The Walt Disney Co Communication Services | 3.01% | 16.3x | 7/9 |
| 9 | TJX | TJX Companies Inc Consumer Cyclical | 2.86% | 30.1x | 7/9 |
| 10 | UBER | Uber Technologies Inc Technology | 2.45% | 17.5x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how IYC’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
10 holdings · 51.4% tracked weight2026-05-23
10 holdings · 51.4% tracked weight2026-05-22
10 holdings · 51.4% tracked weight2026-05-21
10 holdings · 51.4% tracked weight2026-05-20
10 holdings · 51.4% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove IYC Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of $102.18 for IYC presents a snapshot where immediate technical context is limited by the absence of specific moving average crossovers or volume trend data in the provided inputs. Without confirmation that larger market participants are actively accumulating through sustained volume spikes above key averages, it remains unclear whether institutional players view this level as an entry zone or simply noise within their broader positioning strategies. The lack of explicit signal regarding price action relative to historical support and resistance levels prevents a definitive assessment of whether sophisticated investors are building long-term exposure or reducing existing holdings at these coordinates. Institutional behavior is often most visible through sustained deviations in volume that accompany significant price movements, yet the current data set does not offer sufficient granularity to distinguish between organic retail interest and coordinated large-cap activity. Consequently, one cannot ascertain if the market structure supports a continuation of an upward trajectory driven by smart money or if the recent price action reflects a neutral stance where major entities are waiting for clearer catalysts before committing additional capital. The technical picture remains ambiguous without further data points to confirm whether current trading levels represent a strategic inflection point for professional traders or merely short-term volatility within their existing portfolios.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How IYC’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.