PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 8.4x earnings — a 56% discount to the sector average of 19.2x — PYPL is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.9. DCF fair value of $60 implies 27% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a mixed profile characterized by strong capital efficiency but constrained growth momentum. A 3.9% spread between the 15.8% ROIC and 11.9% WACC indicates healthy value creation, supported by an impressive Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 which signals robust financial health. The DuPont decomposition reveals that a 25.8% ROE is driven primarily by leverage (3.96x equity multiplier) rather than operational efficiency, as asset turnover remains modest at 0.41x despite healthy net and gross margins. However, the Altman Z-Score of 1.9 sits in the grey zone regarding bankruptcy risk, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.52 suggests earnings quality is not under significant manipulation pressure. These factors collectively paint a picture of a financially stable entity where returns are amplified by balance sheet leverage rather than rapid asset expansion or margin widening.
Valuation metrics appear compressed relative to historical norms and sector peers, with the current P/E ratio trading at 8.4x. Discounted cash flow analysis implies significant upside potential, estimating a fair value of $58 based on an implied free cash flow growth rate of only 2.6% over the next decade. This low growth assumption contrasts sharply with the market's pricing in slower expansion, suggesting the current multiple may not fully reflect long-term recovery scenarios or that conservative modeling has already been applied to future cash flows. The disconnect between a high F-Score and such subdued valuation multiples warrants scrutiny regarding whether the market is appropriately discounting future operational improvements.
Risk factor analysis highlights notable divergences in performance attribution, with a negative annual Fama-French alpha of -30.98% indicating underperformance relative to risk-adjusted benchmarks over the past year. The stock exhibits a value tilt (HML: 0.112) but suffers from weak profitability characteristics per the RMW factor (-0.385), which may explain recent valuation compression. Compounding these technical signals, insider flow data shows $3,831,457 in net selling over the last ninety days, a sentiment indicator that often precedes further price discovery or consolidation. Investors must weigh the mathematical upside derived from DCF assumptions against the negative momentum evidenced by factor underperformance and executive disposition of shares.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 4% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.6% | 11.6% | 13.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $71 | $55 | $45 |
| 3% | $79 | $60 | $48 |
| 4% | $91 | $66 | $52 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $44.53.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $60 (+26.9%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 56% below its 5-year average P/E of 19.1x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-04 | $0.1400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-19 | $0.1400 | — |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VFQY or ARKF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell PYPL shares regardless of PayPal Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $6.7B of passive capital is structurally linked to PYPL through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in PayPal Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B (BRK.B) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with PYPL. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 31 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
PYPL Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 PYPL shares, reducing daily market volatility.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.1% of the VFQY (VFQY) and 0.8% of the ARKF (ARKF). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 136M shares (15.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest PYPL Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
PYPL Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for PayPal Holdings, Inc. over the past year sits near $45.47 (16% of 252-day volume). The current price of $44.53 sits 2.1% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (16% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
PYPL Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does PayPal Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
PayPal Holdings, Inc. converts 72% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 4,354 | $46.22 | $201,241.88 |
| 2026-05-06 | 320 | $46.49 | $14,876.8 |
| 2026-05-05 | 41,796 | $50.39 | $2.1M |
| 2026-05-04 | 95 | $50.44 | $4,791.8 |
| 2026-04-30 | 4,488 | $50.94 | $228,618.72 |
| 2026-04-29 | 4,500 | $49.64 | $223,380 |
| 2026-04-28 | 5,841 | $49.77 | $290,706.57 |
| 2026-04-27 | 8,859 | $50.48 | $447,202.32 |
| 2026-04-24 | 8,523 | $49.75 | $424,019.25 |
| 2026-04-23 | 5,607 | $51.22 | $287,190.54 |
| 2026-04-22 | 938 | $50.88 | $47,725.44 |
| 2026-04-20 | 10,634 | $50.81 | $540,313.54 |
| 2026-04-15 | 6 | $47.97 | $287.82 |
| 2026-04-14 | 98 | $47.51 | $4,655.98 |
| 2026-04-13 | 200 | $45.24 | $9,048 |
| 2026-04-07 | 529 | $45.48 | $24,058.92 |
| 2026-04-06 | 129,335 | $45.34 | $5.9M |
| 2026-04-02 | 36,949 | $44.63 | $1.6M |
| 2026-04-01 | 447 | $45.23 | $20,217.81 |
| 2026-03-27 | 54,245 | $45.20 | $2.5M |
| 2026-03-23 | 402,289 | $44.01 | $17.7M |
| 2026-03-18 | 31,030 | $46.13 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-17 | 14,038 | $45.42 | $637,605.96 |
| 2026-03-13 | 16,870 | $44.36 | $748,353.2 |
| 2026-03-09 | 1,900 | $46.97 | $89,243 |
| 2026-03-06 | 67,557 | $47.64 | $3.2M |
| 2026-03-04 | 400 | $46.38 | $18,552 |
| 2026-03-02 | 18 | $46.21 | $831.78 |
| 2026-02-24 | 77,003 | $44.05 | $3.4M |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,000 | $41.65 | $41,650 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| MCO | 0.533 | 0.561 | Moderate |
| TROW | 0.513 | 0.507 | Moderate |
| ADBE | 0.511 | 0.497 | Moderate |
| TOST | 0.510 | 0.562 | Moderate |
| FIS | 0.508 | 0.550 | Moderate |
| NDAQ | 0.503 | 0.543 | Moderate |
| TRMB | 0.498 | 0.491 | Moderate |
| ABNB | 0.491 | 0.470 | Moderate |
| CSGP | 0.483 | 0.594 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare PYPL to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.