Communication Services

EchoStar Corporation (SATS)

$123.55
-3.04%
$37.4B
Market Cap
P/E Ratio
0.96
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 3/9Altman Z -0.7 DistressBeneish M -4.07 CleanROIC−WACC -53.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9; Altman Z of -0.7 falls in the academic distress zone.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of SATS reveal a severe deterioration in capital efficiency and earnings generation, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread that is deeply negative at -44.8%, signaling potential value destruction rather than creation. The DuPont decomposition underscores this distress: while asset turnover remains moderate at 0.35x and leverage sits at 7.40x, the catastrophic net margin contraction of -96.6% drives a total ROE collapse to -249.4%. This operational weakness is corroborated by a Piotroski F-Score of only 3/9 and a Profitability Factor (RMW) of -0.681, indicating persistent struggles in generating sustainable returns despite maintaining a gross margin of 25.8% amid revenue contraction. Although the Beneish M-Score of -4.07 suggests low probability of manipulation, the underlying financial trajectory points to significant operational headwinds rather than accounting distortions.

Valuation metrics are not provided in the current dataset; however, the market's pricing mechanism appears to have already factored in extreme downside risk given the company's inability to post positive net income or demonstrate profitable growth. The absence of forward-looking valuation multiples implies that traditional DCF models would yield negative fair values unless aggressive turnaround assumptions regarding margin recovery and revenue stabilization are adopted. Consequently, the current price likely reflects a worst-case scenario where the market has priced in continued losses rather than anticipating an imminent reversal to profitability.

Risk factor analysis presents a complex divergence between historical performance and recent capital flows. While the stock exhibits a substantial Fama-French Alpha of 76.24% annually, suggesting strong outperformance relative to its risk profile over time, this is counterbalanced by severe fundamental degradation including negative ROIC and declining revenue. The Value Factor (HML) score of 0.561 indicates a value tilt, yet the weak profitability factor complicates any straightforward valuation thesis. Most critically, insider activity shows $15.5 million in net selling over the last ninety days, which contrasts sharply with the high alpha and suggests that management may be exiting positions despite the stock's historical outperformance relative to its risk factors.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

3/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics
-0.7
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-4.07
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

25.8%
Gross Margin
-96.6%
Net Margin
-44.8%
ROIC
8.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -53.4%— Negative spread.
-5.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-12026.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-1.7B
Free Cash Flow

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

-96.6%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.35x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
7.40x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
-249.4%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

6.40x
Debt / Equity
0.42x
Current Ratio
-11.4x
Interest Coverage
-3.23%
FCF Yield
-15.8B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$16M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
3
Sale Transactions
2026-03-06AKHAVAN HAMIDSold 3/8 qtrsSale$8M
2026-03-06AKHAVAN HAMIDSold 3/8 qtrsGrant$4M
2026-03-05MANSON DEAN ASold 3/8 qtrsSale$2M
2026-03-05MANSON DEAN ASold 3/8 qtrsGrant$303,699
2026-03-04SWIERINGA JOHN WSold 3/8 qtrsSale$6M

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.80
Act: $-0.71
+11.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.98
Act: $-1.06
-7.7%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $-1.13
Act: $-44.37
-3810.7%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.75
Act: $-4.16
-453.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

68.5%
Annual Volatility
1.95
Sharpe (1Y)
1.10
Sharpe (3Y)
-59.2%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-68.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

1.17
Market β
Mkt-RF
+0.788
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.561
Value (HML)
Value tilt
-0.681
Profit (RMW)
Weak
-0.001
Invest (CMA)
Neutral
Alpha (annual): +76.24%
R²: 9.8%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

-1133.2
Forward P/E
1.33
PEG Ratio
6.64
Price/Book
7M
Avg Volume
$147.25
52W High
$14.90
52W Low
82%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$3.0B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding SATS
0.06%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$4.6T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or IWN, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SATS shares regardless of EchoStar Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to SATS through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in EchoStar Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

SATS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
SATSEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFSPYETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskMETALow RiskGOOGLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
SATS Price Drop (%)0

If EchoStar Corporation (SATS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SATS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 16 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

SATS Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 SATS shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
SATS
Total Shares
158M
ETF Lock-Up
16.6%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
16.6%Locked Float

EchoStar Corporation (SATS) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.6% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 1.1% of the IWN (IWN). Across 16 tracked ETFs, approximately 26M shares (16.6% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 16 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

SATS Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
SATS
PRICE
$123.55
FLOOR (POC)
$124.09
STRENGTH
High
$18$256%$31$38$45$51$58$65$7111%$788%$84$91$98$1047%$11113%$11710%$124POC 14%$123.55$1317%$137$144
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for EchoStar Corporation over the past year sits near $124.09 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $123.55 sits 0.4% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-135,047$129.38$652,980.86
2026-05-12382$129.14$49,331.48
2026-05-1118,624$127.15$2.4M
2026-05-08596$122.62$73,081.52
2026-05-0785,266$125.75$10.7M
2026-05-063,420$117.34$401,302.8
2026-05-0412,310$123.18$1.5M
2026-05-0120$123.14$2,462.8
2026-04-301,641$119.78$196,558.98
2026-04-298,034$123.70$993,805.8
2026-04-2814,660$121.63$1.8M
2026-04-274,075$117.50$478,812.5
2026-04-211,098$135.11$148,350.78
2026-04-2011,674$133.21$1.6M
2026-04-171$132.50$132.5
2026-04-167,734$131.39$1.0M
2026-04-159,521$130.47$1.2M
2026-04-1331,268$128.59$4.0M
2026-04-105,624$120.09$675,386.16
2026-04-09297$122.82$36,477.54
2026-04-08329$124.77$41,049.33
2026-04-071,109$126.95$140,787.55
2026-04-06107,864$128.68$13.9M
2026-04-0275,139$120.60$9.1M
2026-04-0175$117.07$8,780.25
2026-03-3116,490$112.23$1.9M
2026-03-306,621$115.21$762,805.41
2026-03-258$110.84$886.72
2026-03-23182,728$109.84$20.1M
2026-03-195$107.75$538.75

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
GSAT0.2590.418Low correlation
ROKU0.2340.314Low correlation
VSAT0.2220.428Low correlation
HEI0.2010.141Low correlation
RKLB0.1890.471Low correlation
BK0.1840.209Low correlation
FN0.1810.218Low correlation
TD0.1780.276Low correlation
EL0.1770.194Low correlation

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare SATS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.