ESGV(ESGV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe fund's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Technology, with over one-third of its holdings concentrated in this space. Within Technology, names like NVDA and AVGO are prominent contributors to the sector's weight, indicating a focus on semiconductor and networking equipment makers. The presence of consumer-facing giants like AAPL and AMZN also suggests an emphasis on companies that drive growth through digital transformation.
The fund's valuation posture is relatively rich, with a weighted P/E ratio of 26.9x and a weighted P/B ratio of 16.52x. This may indicate that the portfolio has already participated in some of the recent market rally or that it holds more mature businesses with high price multiples. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, which is often characterized by a stronger representation of Financial Services and Consumer Defensive stocks. A favorable macro environment for this fund would likely involve sustained growth in Technology and Communication Services sectors, while an unfavorable environment could be marked by rising interest rates or economic downturns that disproportionately impact these industries.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 20:06:12.977268+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100The fund's name implies a strict adherence to environmental, social, and governance criteria across its entire portfolio. However, the actual holdings reveal a significant concentration within mega-cap technology giants such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Tesla, which collectively dominate the top ten positions by weight. While these companies often possess strong ESG profiles compared to peers in their sectors, the heavy reliance on this specific cluster of large-cap stocks suggests that the fund's performance is heavily influenced by broad market tech trends rather than a diversified implementation of its stated thematic mandate. The presence of major financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Visa alongside consumer staples further indicates that the selection process may prioritize stability through familiar blue-chip names over a rigorous, distinct filtering mechanism for ESG factors across all sectors.
Sector analysis shows that Technology comprises 35.3% of assets, followed by Communication Services at nearly 12%, creating an allocation profile that closely mirrors the broader S&P 500 index rather than standing apart as a specialized thematic vehicle. Although Financials and Healthcare represent substantial portions of the portfolio with dozens of holdings each, the top ten concentration ratio of over 40% highlights a lack of diversification relative to a true ESG-focused strategy which might expect more balanced exposure across industries. The sector weights appear consistent with a large-cap growth tilt found in many standard market indices, raising questions about whether the fund offers genuine differentiation based on its environmental or social screening criteria, or if it functions primarily as a vehicle for accessing established technology leaders under an ESG label.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 16:19:20.615539+00
⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis
AI GeneratedThe newly disclosed risk factors from the largest holdings in this fund highlight three converging macro-level threats: stringent climate change regulations, evolving data privacy mandates, and emerging frameworks for artificial intelligence governance. Specifically, NVIDIA's filings indicate that compliance with environmental standards regarding climate change could materially impact financial conditions, while simultaneously noting that adherence to cybersecurity-driven data privacy requirements may increase operational costs. Furthermore, the potential for AI regulation to raise expenses and alter competitive positioning suggests a broader industry shift where technological innovation faces increased regulatory scrutiny. These disclosures collectively point toward an environment where rapid scaling in technology and sustainability is being met with heightened compliance burdens across multiple sectors represented within the portfolio.
The concentration of these risks among the fund's top holdings creates a significant correlation profile, as several major assets operate under similar pressures despite their diverse business models. While NVIDIA explicitly flags all three categories, other large-cap technology names such as Apple and Microsoft are inherently exposed to data privacy costs and AI regulatory landscapes given their central roles in digital infrastructure and cloud services. The fact that the single largest holding (8.2%) identifies environmental compliance as a material adverse risk underscores how deeply embedded these systemic issues have become for dominant market players. This overlap means that unfavorable policy shifts or enforcement actions targeting climate, cybersecurity, or AI could simultaneously affect multiple high-weight positions, potentially amplifying downside volatility across the entire fund rather than isolating impact to individual stocks.
Although no single company-specific risk appears so unique as to dominate the portfolio entirely, NVIDIA's substantial 8.2% weight means that any material adverse outcome related to its specific disclosures on climate or AI regulation would have a disproportionate effect on total fund performance. The explicit mention of "material adverse impact" in connection with environmental compliance for this top holding suggests that regulatory developments in these areas warrant close monitoring as they could influence the valuation trajectory of a significant portion of the ETF's assets more than smaller constituents like Visa or Costco, which do not currently highlight similar systemic exposures in their recent filings.
Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 01:38:26.320177+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of ESGV reveals a distinct tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology and Communication Services comprising nearly half of the portfolio. This heavy weighting in sectors known for high capital appreciation potential suggests an investment thesis prioritizing innovation-driven companies over stability or income generation. The top five holdings are exclusively concentrated within these two leading sectors, indicating that the fund's performance will be highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts affecting consumer technology spending and digital media trends rather than being diversified across defensive industries like utilities or basic materials.
Concentration risk is a defining characteristic of this structure, evidenced by the significant portion of assets tied to just five major entities. The top ten holdings alone account for over 40% of total assets under management, creating a scenario where adverse events impacting any single large-cap technology firm could disproportionately influence overall portfolio volatility. While such concentration can amplify returns during bull markets characterized by tech expansion, it simultaneously exposes the fund to idiosyncratic risks specific to those dominant players that might not be present in a more broadly diversified vehicle with similar ESG mandates.
Factor tilts are evident through the underrepresentation of traditional value sectors and defensive holdings, which together make up less than 10% of the allocation. This distribution implies an underlying preference for companies with high market capitalization, strong momentum, and potentially elevated valuations rather than those offering low volatility or dividend yields. The minimal exposure to real estate and utilities further underscores a strategy that accepts higher cyclical risk in exchange for potential growth premiums, aligning closely with a modern-growth equity profile filtered through environmental, social, and governance criteria.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 23:19:57.106407+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share ESGV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of ESGV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 444 | 90.9% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 394 | 90.6% |
| VONEVONE | $10B | — | 357 | 89.9% |
| VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares | $2.1T | 0.03% | 356 | 89.8% |
| VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF | $1.5T | 0.03% | 353 | 88.7% |
91% of ESGV's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging ESGV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofESGV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 97% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 83% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside ESGV collectively pay out 32% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 63% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryESGV is up 29.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +35.4%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 6.2% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 81% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of ESGV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of ESGV's analyzed weight, 81% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 19% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 76% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
ELEVATEDESGV's top holding NVDA at 8.2% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 44 vs. the actual count of 50.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
ESGV has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.9% of the market capitalization of ESGV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 52 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | NVIDIA Corp. Technology | 8.22% | 32.4x | 4/9 |
| 2 | AAPL | Apple Inc. Technology | 7.36% | 37.7x | 8/9 |
| 3 | MSFT | Microsoft Corp. Technology | 5.53% | 26.8x | 5/9 |
| 4 | AMZN | Amazon.com Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 4.02% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 5 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc. Class A Communication Services | 3.37% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | AVGO | Broadcom Inc. Technology | 2.88% | 86.9x | 8/9 |
| 7 | GOOG | Alphabet Inc. Class C Communication Services | 2.73% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 8 | META | Facebook Inc. Class A Communication Services | 2.52% | 23.0x | 5/9 |
| 9 | TSLA | Tesla Inc. Consumer Cyclical | 2.11% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 10 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co. Financial Services | 1.50% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 11 | LLY | Eli Lilly & Co. Healthcare | 1.48% | 39.2x | 7/9 |
| 12 | V | Visa Inc. Class A Financial Services | 1.02% | 28.5x | 6/9 |
| 13 | COST | Costco Wholesale Corp. Consumer Defensive | 0.89% | 49.8x | 6/9 |
| 14 | NFLX | Netflix Inc. Communication Services | 0.82% | 27.7x | 6/9 |
| 15 | MA | Mastercard Inc. Class A Financial Services | 0.81% | 28.6x | 8/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how ESGV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 8.22% | 5,253,530 | $916.2M |
| 2 | AAPL | 7.36% | 3,233,954 | $820.7M |
| 3 | MSFT | 5.53% | 1,664,790 | $616.3M |
| 4 | AMZN | 4.02% | 2,153,307 | $448.5M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 3.37% | 1,304,888 | $375.2M |
| 6 | AVGO | 2.88% | 1,036,698 | $320.9M |
| 7 | GOOG | 2.73% | 1,062,393 | $304.8M |
| 8 | META | 2.52% | 490,122 | $280.4M |
| 9 | TSLA | 2.11% | 633,380 | $235.5M |
| 10 | JPM | 1.50% | 570,004 | $167.7M |
| 11 | LLY | 1.48% | 179,827 | $165.4M |
| 12 | V | 1.02% | 377,847 | $114.2M |
| 13 | COST | 0.89% | 99,628 | $99.3M |
| 14 | NFLX | 0.82% | 951,330 | $91.5M |
| 15 | MA | 0.81% | 180,596 | $90.2M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove ESGV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedESGV is currently trading at $128.79, a price point that requires contextualization against its moving average envelope to assess relative value and potential mean-reversion dynamics. Without specific data regarding the location of the short-term or long-term simple moving averages surrounding this current level, it remains unclear whether the asset is exhibiting an overextended condition typical of a reversal setup or if it maintains momentum within a trending channel. The distance between the $128.79 price and the implied central tendency defined by these averages would dictate the statistical probability of a pullback toward fair value versus continued directional movement. In scenarios where the current price sits significantly outside the bounds of its standard deviation bands, historical patterns often suggest a contraction in volatility as prices gravitate back toward the mean. Conversely, if $128.79 aligns closely with or exceeds recent moving average peaks, it may indicate sustained bullish pressure rather than an imminent correction. The absence of additional technical metrics such as volume profiles or oscillator readings limits the ability to confirm whether this specific price level represents a statistical anomaly or a supported equilibrium point within the broader market structure. Ultimately, the positioning relative to these dynamic averages serves only as a snapshot of current valuation stress without predicting future trajectories. Market participants must evaluate how $128.79 interacts with historical support and resistance zones derived from moving average crossovers before forming views on potential reversals. The data provided offers a single coordinate in time but lacks the comparative
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How ESGV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.