STAA (STAA)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 1/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of STAA reveal a distressed operational profile characterized by significant capital inefficiency and deteriorating profitability. A negative ROIC of -9.5% indicates that the company is destroying value relative to its cost of capital, while the net margin contraction to -33.6% underscores severe operating leverage issues despite maintaining an unusually high gross margin of 76.2%. This divergence suggests that rising overhead or selling expenses are eroding top-line gains from product pricing power. The Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 signals acute financial weakness across nine key dimensions, likely reflecting the observed revenue decline and negative earnings trajectory. Conversely, a Beneish M-Score of -2.91 points to low probability of manipulation, suggesting that the reported deterioration in fundamentals is organic rather than accounting-driven.
Valuation metrics are absent from the provided dataset; consequently, no assessment can be made regarding whether current pricing aligns with historical averages, sector peers, or intrinsic fair value derived from DCF models. Without data on price-to-earnings multiples, implied growth rates, or market capitalization, it is impossible to determine if the stock is trading at a discount or premium relative to its risk profile. The lack of forward-looking valuation anchors means investors cannot evaluate how much growth or margin expansion the market currently expects versus what has been achieved historically.
Risk assessment remains incomplete due to missing sector classification and Fama-French alpha data, which are necessary to contextualize performance against style factors like size, value, or momentum. Furthermore, insider transaction activity is not reported, leaving the direction of informed capital flows unknown. The combination of negative revenue growth at -23.7% and a near-zero Piotroski score presents substantial downside risk, yet without additional data on leverage ratios or cash flow stability, the full extent of solvency concerns cannot be quantified.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell STAA shares regardless of STAA's individual fundamentals. We estimate $43M of passive capital is structurally linked to STAA through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on STAA's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in STAA to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If STAA (STAA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies China Construction Bank Corp (939) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with STAA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 9 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
STAA Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 1 STAA shares, reducing daily market volatility.
STAA (STAA) exerts significant gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.2% of the XHE (XHE) and 0.1% of the SLYG (SLYG). Across 9 tracked ETFs, approximately 47M shares (94.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This high passive lock-up reduces the effective active float, which can amplify daily price volatility and momentum signals.
ETFs with Highest STAA Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 9 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
STAA Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for STAA over the past year sits near $27.25 (26% of 252-day volume). The current price of $28.49 trades 4.6% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (26% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 157 | $29.40 | $4,615.8 |
| 2026-05-12 | 920 | $27.83 | $25,603.6 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,046 | $27.75 | $29,026.5 |
| 2026-05-06 | 3,058 | $27.45 | $83,942.1 |
| 2026-05-04 | 1,182 | $27.19 | $32,138.58 |
| 2026-05-01 | 79 | $26.36 | $2,082.44 |
| 2026-04-24 | 265,060 | $24.84 | $6.6M |
| 2026-04-23 | 1,092 | $24.80 | $27,081.6 |
| 2026-04-22 | 278 | $24.92 | $6,927.76 |
| 2026-04-21 | 272 | $25.53 | $6,944.16 |
| 2026-04-14 | 8,092 | $26.84 | $217,189.28 |
| 2026-04-13 | 2,236 | $26.44 | $59,119.84 |
| 2026-04-10 | 18,458 | $25.21 | $465,326.18 |
| 2026-04-09 | 5,173 | $20.88 | $108,012.24 |
| 2026-04-06 | 33,653 | $20.21 | $680,127.13 |
| 2026-04-02 | 33,647 | $19.33 | $650,396.51 |
| 2026-04-01 | 33,590 | $18.70 | $628,133 |
| 2026-03-31 | 585 | $18.34 | $10,728.9 |
| 2026-03-23 | 551 | $17.52 | $9,653.52 |
| 2026-03-20 | 189,162 | $17.47 | $3.3M |
| 2026-03-18 | 2,714 | $17.85 | $48,444.9 |
| 2026-03-17 | 1 | $18.08 | $18.08 |
| 2026-03-10 | 134 | $18.32 | $2,454.88 |
| 2026-03-09 | 881 | $18.46 | $16,263.26 |
| 2026-03-05 | 188 | $19.22 | $3,613.36 |
| 2026-02-27 | 6,482 | $20.32 | $131,714.24 |
| 2026-02-26 | 109 | $20.13 | $2,194.17 |
| 2026-02-25 | 120 | $19.75 | $2,370 |
| 2026-02-24 | 5 | $18.20 | $91 |
| 2026-02-20 | 3,855 | $17.88 | $68,927.4 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare STAA to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.