TDW (TDW)

$74.91
+0.47%
$3.7B
Market Cap
12.4
P/E Ratio
0.57
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 3.6 SafeBeneish M -2.35 CleanROIC−WACC +3.1%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.6 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $377 implies 329% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency of TDW demonstrates a robust ROIC-WACC spread of +3.1%, indicating that the firm generates returns exceeding its cost of capital, though this advantage is modest relative to high-growth peers. This profitability profile is underpinned by exceptional margin quality rather than operational leverage or asset turnover; specifically, a net margin of 24.7% and gross margin of 29.8% suggest strong pricing power or low variable costs, even as revenue growth stagnates at just 0.5% year-over-year. Financial integrity metrics further reinforce the balance sheet's stability, with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signaling fundamental strength and an Altman Z-Score of 3.6 placing the entity well within safe territory for bankruptcy risk, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.35 effectively rules out earnings manipulation concerns.

Despite these operational fundamentals, valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow models. The stock trades at 12.8x forward earnings, representing a 52% premium over its five-year historical average of 8.5x, which implies the market is currently assigning higher growth expectations than recently realized performance supports given the near-flat revenue trajectory. However, DCF analysis suggests a fair value of $377 with an implied upside of 328.8%, creating a stark contrast where traditional multiples appear stretched while absolute valuation models indicate substantial undervaluation based on long-term free cash flow assumptions. This discrepancy highlights that current pricing may be decoupled from recent operational reality, potentially reflecting either market anticipation of future margin expansion or a structural re-rating not yet materialized in earnings per share growth.

The risk-reward profile is characterized by low financial distress probability but ambiguous growth dynamics; the negative ten-year implied FCF growth rate of -3.8% directly contradicts the high DCF upside, suggesting that long-term cash generation assumptions vary wildly depending on terminal value sensitivities or discount rate inputs. While insider activity and specific risk factor deltas are not provided to refine this view, the combination of a stagnant revenue base with elevated valuation multiples creates an environment where downside protection relies heavily on margin durability rather than top-line acceleration. Investors must weigh whether the current premium reflects hidden catalysts absent from historical averages or if it represents a mispricing relative to the company's demonstrated ability to maintain high margins despite flat sales volumes.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$74.91
Fair Value
$382
Implied Upside
+410.0%
$382IMPLIED FAIR VALUEUNDERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)25%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)7.8%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
-3.8%annual FCF growth priced in at $74.91

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.8%9.8%
2%$473$319$231
3%$617$377$259
4%$904$465$297

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $74.91.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $377 (+328.8%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
3.6
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.35
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

29.8%
Gross Margin
24.7%
Net Margin
10.9%
ROIC
7.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +3.1%— Positive spread.
+0.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+85.3%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
353.3M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.75x
Debt / Equity
2.90x
Current Ratio
4.3x
Interest Coverage
0.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
8.14%
FCF Yield
437.4M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.59
Act: $0.84
+41.6%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.48
Act: $1.46
+206.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.51
Act: $0.61
+19.8%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.77
Act: $0.45
-41.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.0100
Latest Dividend
$0.01
2020 Total
0.0%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$9.68
2006
$19.35
2007
$29.03
2008
$32.26
2009
$32.26
2010
$32.26
2011
$32.26
2012
$32.26
2013
$32.26
2014
$32.26
2015
$0.01
2017
$0.01
2020
DateAmountChange
2020-12-30$0.01000.0%
2017-12-28$0.0100-99.9%
2015-12-02$8.06450.0%
2015-09-02$8.06450.0%
2015-06-03$8.06450.0%
2015-03-04$8.06450.0%
2014-12-03$8.06450.0%
2014-09-03$8.06450.0%
2014-06-04$8.06450.0%
2014-02-28$8.06450.0%
2013-12-04$8.06450.0%
2013-09-04$8.06450.0%
Stock Splits
2017-08-01: 0.031:11980-10-29: 1.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

53.6%
Annual Volatility
1.74
Sharpe (1Y)
0.61
Sharpe (3Y)
-70.3%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-70.3%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

11.7
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.67
Price/Book
848017
Avg Volume
$93.13
52W High
$39.90
52W Low
66%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$155M
Tracked Passive Exposure
7
ETFs Holding TDW
0.16%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$97B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XES or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TDW shares regardless of TDW's individual fundamentals. We estimate $155M of passive capital is structurally linked to TDW through 7 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on TDW's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in TDW to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TDW Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TDWEpicenterVBKETFVTWOETFSPSMETFXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow RiskKGSHigh RiskWHDLow Risk
TDW Price Drop (%)0

If TDW (TDW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TDW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TDW Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 24 TDW shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TDW
Total Shares
50M
ETF Lock-Up
4.1%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
4.1%Locked Float

TDW (TDW) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.7% of the XES (XES) and 0.4% of the SLYG (SLYG). Across 7 tracked ETFs, approximately 2M shares (4.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TDW Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TDW
PRICE
$74.91
FLOOR (POC)
$57.20
STRENGTH
High
$41$44$478%$4911%$5212%$559%$57POC 14%$608%$63$65$68$71$73$76$74.91$78$81$84$86$89$92
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for TDW over the past year sits near $57.20 (14% of 252-day volume). The current price of $74.91 trades 31.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (14% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

TDW Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does TDW convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$353M
EBITDA
$437M
FCF Conversion
81%
Reinvestment Rate
19%
81% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
3.1%

TDW converts 81% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-13669$81.50$54,523.5
2026-05-1245,527$81.33$3.7M
2026-05-0816,396$77.86$1.3M
2026-05-0712$81.72$980.64
2026-05-0658,539$85.01$5.0M
2026-05-05508$87.08$44,236.64
2026-05-011,438$89.33$128,456.54
2026-04-309$88.33$794.97
2026-04-2980$86.67$6,933.6
2026-04-233,922$85.64$335,880.08
2026-04-201,388$85.25$118,327
2026-04-1731$84.37$2,615.47
2026-04-14217$87.83$19,059.11
2026-04-1336,031$86.10$3.1M
2026-04-0953$87.84$4,655.52
2026-04-082,299$86.25$198,288.75
2026-04-0730$85.32$2,559.6
2026-04-06212$84.38$17,888.56
2026-03-3112,624$81.89$1.0M
2026-03-30434$82.40$35,761.6
2026-03-2542$76.90$3,229.8
2026-03-23169$72.48$12,249.12
2026-03-19941$75.27$70,829.07
2026-03-16673$76.76$51,659.48
2026-03-112,177$76.94$167,498.38
2026-03-107,292$81.00$590,652
2026-03-093,845$77.79$299,102.55
2026-03-0517$83.80$1,424.6
2026-03-047,991$87.67$700,570.97
2026-03-0212$79.42$953.04

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
NE0.6490.660Moderate
SDRL0.6090.564Moderate
VAL0.5240.447Moderate
RIG0.5160.516Moderate
OII0.5130.486Moderate
NOV0.5130.534Moderate
MUR0.5070.478Moderate
PTEN0.5060.472Moderate
WFRD0.5060.416Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TDW to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.