STAG (STAG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics reveal a high-margin, low-turnover business model where profitability is driven primarily by asset leverage rather than operational efficiency. The DuPont decomposition shows that while the 32.4% net margin and 79.7% gross margin indicate strong pricing power or cost advantages, the modest 0.12x asset turnover limits overall scale. Consequently, equity multipliers of 1.96x are necessary to achieve a 7.4% ROE, which sits below the implied quality suggested by a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.48; this divergence suggests that while earnings appear stable enough to pass basic manipulation tests, the reliance on leverage constrains organic capital efficiency compared to peers with higher asset utilization.
Valuation metrics present a distinct contrast between historical multiples and intrinsic value models. Although specific current P/E data is absent for direct comparison, the DCF model assigns a fair value of $20, implying that the market's current pricing may deviate from this calculated baseline depending on assumed growth rates beyond the observed 10.1% revenue expansion. If the stock trades significantly above or below this anchor, it reflects varying expectations regarding future margin sustainability and capital allocation efficiency rather than immediate fundamental shifts in the business model itself.
Risk assessment is complicated by a notable divergence between financial quality indicators and insider behavior. Despite the favorable Beneish M-Score suggesting low earnings manipulation risk and a solid Piotroski score indicating improving fundamentals, there has been $5,346,230 in net insider selling over the past 90 days. This outsized outflow by management could signal concerns about near-term valuation levels or capital deployment strategy that are not immediately apparent from the static financial ratios provided.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7% | 9% | 11% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $36 | $21 | $13 |
| 3% | $47 | $26 | $15 |
| 4% | $65 | $33 | $19 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $26 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VNQ or MDYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell STAG shares regardless of STAG's individual fundamentals. We estimate $678M of passive capital is structurally linked to STAG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on STAG's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in STAG to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If STAG (STAG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VRTPX) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with STAG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 13 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
STAG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest STAG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 13 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
STAG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does STAG convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
STAG converts 57% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 | 834 | $38.52 | $32,125.68 |
| 2026-05-18 | 144 | $37.77 | $5,438.88 |
| 2026-05-11 | 18 | $38.95 | $701.1 |
| 2026-05-01 | 311 | $38.58 | $11,998.38 |
| 2026-04-17 | 66 | $38.82 | $2,562.12 |
| 2026-04-10 | 5 | $37.90 | $189.5 |
| 2026-04-02 | 269 | $36.21 | $9,740.49 |
| 2026-04-01 | 201 | $36.06 | $7,248.06 |
| 2026-03-31 | 261 | $36.09 | $9,419.49 |
| 2026-03-30 | 257 | $36.09 | $9,275.13 |
| 2026-03-19 | 14 | $38.09 | $533.26 |
| 2026-03-17 | 270 | $38.30 | $10,341 |
| 2026-03-05 | 773 | $39.47 | $30,510.31 |
| 2026-02-20 | 672 | $38.54 | $25,898.88 |
| 2026-02-09 | 7,488 | $39.31 | $294,353.28 |
| 2026-02-04 | 2,177 | $38.48 | $83,770.96 |
| 2026-01-30 | 9,024 | $37.28 | $336,414.72 |
| 2026-01-15 | 13,842 | $37.69 | $521,704.98 |
| 2026-01-05 | 1,311 | $36.92 | $48,402.12 |
| 2025-12-30 | 2 | $37.13 | $74.26 |
| 2025-12-23 | 3,061 | $37.10 | $113,563.1 |
| 2025-11-28 | 2,464 | $39.40 | $97,081.6 |
| 2025-11-20 | 2,459 | $38.19 | $93,909.21 |
| 2025-11-18 | 16,403 | $38.51 | $631,679.53 |
| 2025-11-13 | 1 | $39.09 | $39.09 |
| 2025-11-12 | 34 | $39.43 | $1,340.62 |
| 2025-11-04 | 789 | $38.55 | $30,415.95 |
| 2025-10-28 | 14,401 | $38.54 | $555,014.54 |
| 2025-10-23 | 2,785 | $38.58 | $107,445.3 |
| 2025-10-15 | 6,200 | $36.82 | $228,284 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare STAG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.