Stryker Corporation (SYK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 35.4x earnings — a 46% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — SYK is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 4.7. DCF fair value of $375 suggests 8% upside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedStryker Corporation demonstrates a fundamentally robust business model characterized by expansive gross margins of 64.0% and double-digit revenue growth, yet its capital allocation efficiency is constrained by a narrow ROIC-WACC spread of only +0.5%. The DuPont decomposition reveals that the current 14.5% return on equity relies heavily on financial leverage (2.13x) rather than operational intensity or pricing power, as asset turnover remains modest at 0.53x. While profitability factors indicate strong underlying earnings quality with a Beneish M-Score of -2.62 and an Altman Z-Score of 4.7 suggesting low distress risk, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals limited financial strength relative to sector peers. This structural reliance on leverage to drive returns contrasts sharply with the company's high-growth trajectory, creating a tension between operational scale and capital efficiency that warrants scrutiny regarding long-term value creation potential.
Valuation metrics reflect significant market optimism, with shares trading at a premium 39.5x forward earnings compared to the sector average of 30.8x. Although the DCF model implies substantial upside based on an assumed ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 12.5%, this valuation assumes sustained execution that may not align with current market pricing for such high-growth profiles. The discrepancy between the implied fair value and current multiples suggests the market is aggressively discounting future cash flows, potentially overcompensating for perceived risks in capital allocation or competitive dynamics within the healthcare equipment space. Investors must weigh whether the premium valuation adequately compensates for a Fama-French alpha of -9.71% annually, which indicates underperformance relative to standard factor models despite strong profitability characteristics.
The risk-reward profile is complicated by divergent signals regarding insider sentiment and systematic performance. Despite robust profitability factors driving positive RMW scores, net insider selling totaling approximately $182 million over the last 90 days raises questions about management's view on near-term equity valuation or capital needs. Coupled with a negative Fama-French alpha, these data points suggest that while the company possesses durable competitive advantages evidenced by high margins and low distress risk, it has recently struggled to generate excess returns relative to its size and book value drivers. The convergence of narrow spreads, insider outflows, and factor underperformance creates an environment where future performance hinges on whether management can improve asset turnover or justify continued leverage without eroding the thin ROIC cushion.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 11% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.9% | 9.9% | 11.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $467 | $332 | $252 |
| 3% | $555 | $375 | $277 |
| 4% | $688 | $433 | $308 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $293.30.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $375 (+8.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 3% below its 5-year average P/E of 41.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of SYK is below both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, indicating a short-term downtrend within the broader longer-term decline. With an RSI of 28.4, the stock appears to be in oversold territory, suggesting it may have reached a level where further downward momentum could potentially diminish or reverse.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-31 | $0.8800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-31 | $0.8800 | +4.8% |
| 2025-09-30 | $0.8400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-30 | $0.8400 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-31 | $0.8400 | 0.0% |
| 2024-12-31 | $0.8400 | +5.0% |
| 2024-09-30 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-06-28 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-27 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-12-28 | $0.8000 | +6.7% |
| 2023-09-28 | $0.7500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-06-29 | $0.7500 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IHI or XLV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SYK shares regardless of Stryker Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $13.5B of passive capital is structurally linked to SYK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Stryker Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Stryker Corporation (SYK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Abbott Laboratories (ABT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with SYK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SYK Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 9 SYK shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Stryker Corporation (SYK) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 11.0% of the IHI (IHI) and 2.0% of the State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 43M shares (11.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest SYK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SYK Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Stryker Corporation over the past year sits near $369.41 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $293.30 sits 20.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (12% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
SYK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Stryker Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Stryker Corporation converts 68% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 167 | $285.47 | $47,673.49 |
| 2026-05-08 | 1,877 | $294.23 | $552,269.71 |
| 2026-05-06 | 3,164 | $295.25 | $934,171 |
| 2026-04-28 | 115 | $329.01 | $37,836.15 |
| 2026-04-22 | 934 | $327.30 | $305,698.2 |
| 2026-04-17 | 25 | $338.38 | $8,459.5 |
| 2026-04-15 | 1,400 | $345.88 | $484,232 |
| 2026-04-06 | 15 | $331.54 | $4,973.1 |
| 2026-03-27 | 787 | $332.68 | $261,819.16 |
| 2026-03-26 | 8,686 | $327.65 | $2.8M |
| 2026-03-25 | 8,080 | $328.51 | $2.7M |
| 2026-03-23 | 687 | $335.67 | $230,605.29 |
| 2026-03-17 | 184 | $349.56 | $64,319.04 |
| 2026-03-16 | 601 | $336.77 | $202,398.77 |
| 2026-03-13 | 13,647 | $337.21 | $4.6M |
| 2026-03-12 | 824 | $345.78 | $284,922.72 |
| 2026-03-10 | 28,931 | $365.92 | $10.6M |
| 2026-03-09 | 18,818 | $364.56 | $6.9M |
| 2026-03-02 | 20 | $387.46 | $7,749.2 |
| 2026-02-17 | 2,952 | $366.05 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-10 | 17,842 | $356.08 | $6.4M |
| 2026-01-21 | 31,461 | $359.61 | $11.3M |
| 2026-01-16 | 229 | $362.49 | $83,010.21 |
| 2026-01-14 | 4 | $355.82 | $1,423.28 |
| 2025-12-15 | 7 | $354.09 | $2,478.63 |
| 2025-12-11 | 575 | $353.80 | $203,435 |
| 2025-12-09 | 129 | $353.60 | $45,614.4 |
| 2025-12-03 | 1,561 | $366.68 | $572,387.48 |
| 2025-11-25 | 71 | $370.22 | $26,285.62 |
| 2025-11-19 | 16 | $359.52 | $5,752.32 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| VRTPX | 0.536 | 0.388 | Moderate |
| MDT | 0.513 | 0.500 | Moderate |
| ECL | 0.499 | 0.474 | Moderate |
| MTD | 0.470 | 0.330 | Moderate |
| ISRG | 0.469 | 0.394 | Moderate |
| HLT | 0.454 | 0.348 | Moderate |
| MAR | 0.453 | 0.369 | Moderate |
| GEHC | 0.453 | 0.363 | Moderate |
| BEN | 0.440 | 0.353 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare SYK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.