Communication Services

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO)

$204.59
-1.86%
$15.4B
Market Cap
76.3
P/E Ratio
0.60
Beta
1.52%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.9 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.75 CleanROIC−WACC -2.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

TKO trades at 76.3x earnings — a 138% premium to its sector average of 32.1x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.9. DCF fair value of $867 implies 344% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of TKO Group Holdings reveal a stark divergence between top-line momentum and capital efficiency. While revenue surged 68.8% year-over-year, the company's ability to generate value is constrained by an ROIC-WACC spread of -0.9%, indicating that current operations are destroying shareholder value relative to the cost of capital. The DuPont decomposition clarifies this weakness: a low asset turnover of 0.31x and modest equity multiplier of 1.68x suggest growth is being driven primarily by margin expansion rather than operational leverage or balance sheet strength, resulting in an ROE of only 2.1%. Although the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 signals moderate financial health and a Beneish M-Score of -1.65 suggests low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 1.9 flags potential distress given the company's high leverage profile relative to its asset base.

Valuation metrics present an extreme premium that appears disconnected from the underlying profitability drivers. The current P/E ratio of 90.2x significantly outpaces both historical norms and the sector average of 35.7x, implying the market is pricing in aggressive future expansion rather than current earnings power. This disconnect is highlighted by a DCF model projecting fair value at $1,463 with an implied upside of 625.4%, yet this valuation relies on negative ten-year free cash flow growth assumptions of -7.3%. The scenario suggests the market may be overcompensating for revenue velocity while ignoring the weak profitability factor (RMW) score of -0.261, which indicates that despite high gross margins near 60%, net returns remain insufficient to justify such a multiple in an absolute terms context.

Risk factors and alpha generation present mixed signals regarding future performance sustainability. The stock exhibits a strong Fama-French Alpha of 26.47% annually, suggesting it has historically outperformed its factor-matched peers, yet this momentum is counterbalanced by weak profitability characteristics and significant insider activity. Specifically, $34.48 million in net insider selling over the last ninety days introduces a notable divergence between management confidence and shareholder sentiment. While the value factor (HML) remains neutral at 0.030, indicating no specific tilt toward undervalued assets, the combination of negative ROIC spread, deteriorating profitability factors, and substantial executive divestiture warrants caution regarding whether current valuations can be sustained as revenue growth moderates.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$204.59
Fair Value
$866
Implied Upside
+323.3%
$866IMPLIED FAIR VALUEUNDERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)24%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)7.2%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
-2.5%annual FCF growth priced in at $204.59

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of -3% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.2%9.2%
2%$955$711$490
3%$1255$867$561
4%$1855$1121$660

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $204.59.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $867 (+343.7%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

76.3x
TKO P/E
32.1x
Sector Avg
46.9x
5Y Avg P/E
+138%
vs Sector

Currently trading 85% above its 5-year average P/E of 46.9x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.9
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.75
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

59.8%
Gross Margin
4.1%
Net Margin
4.7%
ROIC
7.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.5%— Negative spread.
-3.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+1977.0%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.2B
Free Cash Flow
55%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

4.1%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.31x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.68x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
2.1%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.68x
Debt / Equity
1.26x
Current Ratio
4.0x
Interest Coverage
2.2x
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.27%
FCF Yield
1.3B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$34M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
23
Sale Transactions
2026-03-09KAPRAL SHANESold 3/8 qtrsSale$50,584
2026-03-03KHAN NICHOLASSold 6/8 qtrsSale$2M
2026-03-03KAPRAL SHANESold 3/8 qtrsSale$136,697
2026-02-23KAPRAL SHANESold 3/8 qtrsSale$129,360
2026-02-17KAPRAL SHANESold 3/8 qtrsSale$128,134

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.55
Act: $0.69
+24.4%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.09
Act: $1.17
+7.5%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.51
Act: $0.47
-8.0%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.22
Act: $-0.03
-113.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$0.7800
Latest Dividend
$2.30
2025 Total
-43.9%
YoY Growth
Annual Dividends per Share
$0.48
2015
$0.48
2016
$0.48
2017
$0.48
2018
$0.48
2019
$0.48
2020
$0.48
2021
$0.48
2022
$4.10
2023
$2.30
2025
$0.78
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-03-16$0.78000.0%
2025-12-15$0.7800+2.6%
2025-09-15$0.7600+100.0%
2025-06-13$0.38000.0%
2025-03-14$0.3800-90.2%
2023-09-21$3.8600+3116.7%
2023-06-14$0.12000.0%
2023-03-14$0.12000.0%
2022-12-14$0.12000.0%
2022-09-14$0.12000.0%
2022-06-14$0.12000.0%
2022-03-14$0.12000.0%

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

32.6%
Annual Volatility
0.92
Sharpe (1Y)
0.76
Sharpe (3Y)
-34.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-34.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.65
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.048
Size (SMB)
Neutral
+0.030
Value (HML)
Neutral
-0.261
Profit (RMW)
Weak
+0.367
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +26.47%
R²: 10.5%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

44.0
Forward P/E
1.33
PEG Ratio
4.56
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$226.94
52W High
$152.29
52W Low
70%
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$2.3B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TKO
0.05%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$4.4T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TKO shares regardless of TKO Group Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $2.3B of passive capital is structurally linked to TKO through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in TKO Group Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TKO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TKOEpicenterVOOETFIVVETFSPYETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskMETALow RiskGOOGLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
TKO Price Drop (%)0

If TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with TKO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 27 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TKO Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 5 TKO shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TKO
Total Shares
75M
ETF Lock-Up
18.4%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
18.4%Locked Float

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.4% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 0.8% of the VOX (VOX). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 14M shares (18.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.

Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TKO Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TKO
PRICE
$204.59
FLOOR (POC)
$186.40
STRENGTH
High
$152$156$160$164$168$171$175$179$1838%$186POC 13%$1909%$1949%$19810%$20113%$2056%$204.59$209$213$217$220$224
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for TKO Group Holdings, Inc. over the past year sits near $186.40 (13% of 252-day volume). The current price of $204.59 trades 9.8% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (13% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

TKO Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does TKO Group Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1.2B
EBITDA
$1.3B
FCF Conversion
88%
Reinvestment Rate
12%
88% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.5%

TKO Group Holdings, Inc. converts 88% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-13369$183.33$67,648.77
2026-05-05128$186.00$23,808
2026-05-04139$185.95$25,847.05
2026-04-2821,661$186.20$4.0M
2026-04-246,583$186.26$1.2M
2026-04-204,639$186.31$864,292.09
2026-04-173,069$184.44$566,046.36
2026-04-1580$195.37$15,629.6
2026-04-1480$195.47$15,637.6
2026-04-096,578$197.05$1.3M
2026-04-076,093$197.02$1.2M
2026-04-01178,673$201.65$36.0M
2026-03-257$193.48$1,354.36
2026-03-2059$197.31$11,641.29
2026-03-132,678$201.27$539,001.06
2026-03-031,202$224.96$270,401.92
2026-02-17624$206.75$129,012
2026-02-10251$209.39$52,556.89
2026-02-091,148$211.90$243,261.2
2026-02-043,715$203.12$754,590.8
2026-02-0210,736$202.58$2.2M
2026-01-2617$204.91$3,483.47
2026-01-2124,157$203.41$4.9M
2026-01-20395$203.27$80,291.65
2026-01-0673,455$203.65$15.0M
2026-01-0510$206.94$2,069.4
2026-01-0264$209.00$13,376
2025-12-2922,096$217.44$4.8M
2025-12-226,453$213.44$1.4M
2025-12-1579,559$208.42$16.6M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
VRTPX0.3950.423Moderate
EMR0.3840.401Moderate
SARO0.3630.355Moderate
BLK0.3490.317Moderate
CCL0.3470.335Moderate
J0.3400.441Moderate
EGP0.3360.448Moderate
TFC0.3360.356Moderate
ECL0.3340.319Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TKO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.