Communication Services / Telecom Services

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)

$188.83
+1.12%
$202.9B
Market Cap
19.9
P/E Ratio
0.32
Beta
2.18%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 1.6 DistressBeneish M -2.74 CleanROIC−WACC +0.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 19.9x earnings — a 38% discount to the sector average of 32.1x — TMUS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.6. DCF fair value of $737 implies 283% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of T-Mobile US reveal a capital allocation spread where the ROIC-WACC gap narrows to just 0.8%, suggesting limited excess returns relative to the cost of debt and equity financing. Despite an ROE of 18.6% driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier at 3.70x) rather than operational efficiency, the DuPont decomposition shows thin margins on assets given a modest turnover ratio of 0.40x against healthy gross profitability of 62.9%. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.74 indicates low earnings manipulation risk and revenue growth remains robust at 8.5% YoY, the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 combined with an Altman Z-Score of 1.7 points to moderate financial distress risks that constrain long-term creditworthiness compared to peers.

Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. The current P/E of 20.7x trades at a substantial discount to the sector average of 27.3x, while the DCF model implies a fair value significantly higher than current levels based on an assumed long-term free cash flow growth rate near zero over ten years. This suggests the market may be pricing in persistent stagnation or structural headwinds not fully captured by short-term margin expansion, creating a wide gap between implied stability and potential upside if leverage is de-risked without eroding returns.

Risk-adjusted performance data highlights substantial underperformance relative to traditional factor benchmarks over the measured period. The Fama-French Alpha stands at -23.60% annually, indicating poor risk-adjusted returns despite exposure to value (HML: 0.271) and robust profitability factors. This negative alpha is compounded by significant insider activity showing net selling of approximately $151 million over the last ninety days, which often signals management concerns regarding near-term liquidity or valuation levels that contradict the theoretical upside in DCF models.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive
Market Price
$188.83
Fair Value
$740
Implied Upside
+291.7%
$740IMPLIED FAIR VALUEUNDERVALUEDOVERUNDER
Growth Rate (Y1–5)21%
-10%20%50%
Discount Rate (WACC)6.9%
5%12.5%20%

5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.

Reverse DCFMarket-Implied
0.1%annual FCF growth priced in at $188.83

The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 8% YoY revenue.

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%6.9%8.9%
2%$746$589$390
3%$989$737$454
4%$1477$986$545

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $188.83.

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $737 (+283.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

19.9x
TMUS P/E
32.1x
Sector Avg
25.7x
5Y Avg P/E
-38%
vs Sector

Currently trading 22% below its 5-year average P/E of 25.7x.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The 50-day moving average of $203.03 is below the 200-day moving average of $220.36, indicating that T-Mobile US (TMUS) may be in a period of consolidation or potential upward momentum following a longer-term downtrend. With an RSI value of 51.5, TMUS currently stands near the midpoint of its overbought and oversold range, suggesting balanced short-term price action without extreme conditions on either side.

RSI (14)
SMA 50
SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.74
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

62.9%
Gross Margin
12.4%
Net Margin
7.3%
ROIC
6.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +0.4%— Positive spread.
+8.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-3.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
15.4B
Free Cash Flow
27%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

12.4%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.40x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
3.70x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
18.6%
Return on Equity
⚠️ High equity multiplier — ROE is being amplified by leverage, not operational excellence.

Balance Sheet Health

2.70x
Debt / Equity
1.00x
Current Ratio
4.8x
Interest Coverage
2.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
5.24%
FCF Yield
31.6B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$151M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
8
Sale Transactions
2026-03-12NELSON MARK WOLFESold 3/8 qtrsGrant$18,151
2026-03-10DATAR SRIKANT MADHAVSold 3/8 qtrsSale$218,250
2026-03-04DATAR SRIKANT MADHAVSold 3/8 qtrsSale$727,640
2026-02-24SIEVERT G MICHAELSold 7/8 qtrsSale$3M
2026-02-24NELSON MARK WOLFESold 3/8 qtrsSale$517,968

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $2.47
Act: $2.58
+4.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $2.67
Act: $2.84
+6.3%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.40
Act: $2.41
+0.4%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $2.06
Act: $1.88
-8.9%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Dividend History

$1.0200
Latest Dividend
$3.66
2025 Total
+29.3%
YoY Growth
2 yrs
Consecutive Increases
Annual Dividends per Share
$4.06
2013
$0.65
2023
$2.83
2024
$3.66
2025
$2.04
2026
DateAmountChange
2026-05-29$1.02000.0%
2026-02-27$1.02000.0%
2025-11-26$1.0200+15.9%
2025-08-29$0.88000.0%
2025-05-30$0.88000.0%
2025-02-28$0.88000.0%
2024-11-27$0.8800+35.4%
2024-08-30$0.65000.0%
2024-05-31$0.65000.0%
2024-02-29$0.65000.0%
2023-11-30$0.6500-84.0%
2013-05-01$4.0600
Stock Splits
2013-05-01: 0.5:1

Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.

Risk Profile

26.6%
Annual Volatility
-1.07
Sharpe (1Y)
-30.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.

0.35
Market β
Mkt-RF
-0.671
Size (SMB)
Large-cap tilt
+0.271
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.202
Profit (RMW)
Robust
+0.597
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -23.60%
R²: 11.6%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Fundamentals

13.4
Forward P/E
0.75
PEG Ratio
3.51
Price/Book
6M
Avg Volume
$261.56
52W High
$181.36
52W Low
9%
52W Range Position

Smart Money Flow

Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.

FundQuarterShares Change% ChangeAction
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q1-10,300-12.9%Decreased
Millennium Management2026-Q1-212,200-39.2%Decreased
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q1+158,600+45.2%Increased
Citadel Advisors2026-Q1-1,300,300-28.3%Decreased
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q1-1,514,700-78.7%Decreased
Bridgewater Associates2026-Q1-13,426-34.0%Decreased
DE Shaw2026-Q1+64,454+7.9%Increased
DE Shaw2025-Q4+709,339+675.2%Increased
Point72 Asset Mgmt2025-Q4+337,700+2617.8%Increased
Citadel Advisors2025-Q4-588,500-11.3%Decreased
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q4+421,100+28.0%Increased
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q4+80,000+100.0%New Position

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$16.1B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding TMUS
0.24%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.8T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TMUS shares regardless of T-Mobile US, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $16.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to TMUS through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in T-Mobile US, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

TMUS Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
TMUSEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFMETALow RiskGOOGLLow RiskMETALow RiskGOOGLow RiskGOOGLLow Risk
TMUS Price Drop (%)0

If T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TMUS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

TMUS Ownership Dynamics

Passive funds hold 1 in every 13 TMUS shares, reducing daily market volatility.

Ticker
TMUS
Total Shares
1.1B
ETF Lock-Up
7.8%
Display Mode
Total Float Impact
7.8%Locked Float

T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.7% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 2.6% of the VOX (VOX). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 85M shares (7.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.

Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

TMUS Institutional Volume Profile

252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.

TICKER
TMUS
PRICE
$188.83
FLOOR (POC)
$197.96
STRENGTH
Medium
$182$186$1907%$188.83$1949%$198POC 10%$202$2066%$210$2137%$2178%$221$2257%$229$233$2377%$241$245$248$252$256
Focus Zone
Point of Control (POC) Support (below price) Resistance (above price) Current Price

The highest-volume price zone for T-Mobile US, Inc. over the past year sits near $197.96 (10% of 252-day volume). The current price of $188.83 sits 4.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.

Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.

TMUS Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does T-Mobile US, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$15.4B
EBITDA
$31.6B
FCF Conversion
49%
Reinvestment Rate
51%
49% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
0.4%

T-Mobile US, Inc. converts 49% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 51% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-129,668$190.85$1.8M
2026-05-1126,248$193.63$5.1M
2026-05-086,055$194.20$1.2M
2026-05-042,004$196.06$392,904.24
2026-05-0116$195.50$3,128
2026-04-22215,713$195.39$42.1M
2026-04-20200$197.67$39,534
2026-04-161$190.19$190.19
2026-04-153$190.00$570
2026-04-141$192.43$192.43
2026-04-1314,624$195.71$2.9M
2026-04-101$197.54$197.54
2026-04-082$200.54$401.08
2026-04-0711,354$198.61$2.3M
2026-03-3010,902$210.82$2.3M
2026-03-2522,291$211.26$4.7M
2026-03-2422,343$208.76$4.7M
2026-03-2318,458$208.47$3.8M
2026-03-2016,261$206.59$3.4M
2026-03-1923,742$206.62$4.9M
2026-03-1312,799$214.37$2.7M
2026-03-10627$217.50$136,372.5
2026-03-091,280$221.57$283,609.6
2026-02-2743$213.15$9,165.45
2026-02-243,947$219.95$868,142.65
2026-02-231,231$215.46$265,231.26
2026-02-20206$215.30$44,351.8
2026-02-171,878$219.50$412,221
2026-02-092,500$197.39$493,475
2026-01-303$189.28$567.84

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)

Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.

FundQuarterSharesValue ($K)
Citadel Advisors2026-Q13,301,500$400,141,800K
DE Shaw2026-Q1878,854$106,517,105K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2026-Q1509,200$61,715,040K
Renaissance Technologies2026-Q1410,500$49,752,600K
Millennium Management2026-Q1329,600$39,947,520K
Two Sigma Investments2026-Q169,700$8,447,640K
Bridgewater Associates2026-Q126,072$3,159,926K
Citadel Advisors2025-Q44,601,800$449,825,950K
Renaissance Technologies2025-Q41,925,200$188,188,300K
DE Shaw2025-Q4814,400$79,607,600K
Millennium Management2025-Q4541,800$52,960,950K
Point72 Asset Mgmt2025-Q4350,600$34,271,150K
Two Sigma Investments2025-Q480,000$7,820,000K
Bridgewater Associates2025-Q439,498$3,860,929K
Citadel Advisors2025-Q35,190,300$465,569,910K

Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.

Price Correlations

Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.

Peer252-Day (1Y)126-Day (6M)Direction
WTGXXNaNNaN
T0.6320.666Moderate
VZ0.5920.612Moderate
DUK0.3790.394Moderate
WEC0.3700.385Moderate
ERIE0.3600.208Moderate
CMS0.3540.296Moderate
AON0.3420.199Moderate
PGR0.3370.396Moderate
SO0.3310.330Moderate

Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.

Compare TMUS to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.