T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 19.9x earnings — a 38% discount to the sector average of 32.1x — TMUS is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.6. DCF fair value of $737 implies 283% upside from current prices based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of T-Mobile US reveal a capital allocation spread where the ROIC-WACC gap narrows to just 0.8%, suggesting limited excess returns relative to the cost of debt and equity financing. Despite an ROE of 18.6% driven primarily by high leverage (Equity Multiplier at 3.70x) rather than operational efficiency, the DuPont decomposition shows thin margins on assets given a modest turnover ratio of 0.40x against healthy gross profitability of 62.9%. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.74 indicates low earnings manipulation risk and revenue growth remains robust at 8.5% YoY, the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 combined with an Altman Z-Score of 1.7 points to moderate financial distress risks that constrain long-term creditworthiness compared to peers.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. The current P/E of 20.7x trades at a substantial discount to the sector average of 27.3x, while the DCF model implies a fair value significantly higher than current levels based on an assumed long-term free cash flow growth rate near zero over ten years. This suggests the market may be pricing in persistent stagnation or structural headwinds not fully captured by short-term margin expansion, creating a wide gap between implied stability and potential upside if leverage is de-risked without eroding returns.
Risk-adjusted performance data highlights substantial underperformance relative to traditional factor benchmarks over the measured period. The Fama-French Alpha stands at -23.60% annually, indicating poor risk-adjusted returns despite exposure to value (HML: 0.271) and robust profitability factors. This negative alpha is compounded by significant insider activity showing net selling of approximately $151 million over the last ninety days, which often signals management concerns regarding near-term liquidity or valuation levels that contradict the theoretical upside in DCF models.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 8% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.9% | 8.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $746 | $589 | $390 |
| 3% | $989 | $737 | $454 |
| 4% | $1477 | $986 | $545 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $188.83.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $737 (+283.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 22% below its 5-year average P/E of 25.7x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe 50-day moving average of $203.03 is below the 200-day moving average of $220.36, indicating that T-Mobile US (TMUS) may be in a period of consolidation or potential upward momentum following a longer-term downtrend. With an RSI value of 51.5, TMUS currently stands near the midpoint of its overbought and oversold range, suggesting balanced short-term price action without extreme conditions on either side.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-29 | $1.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-27 | $1.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-26 | $1.0200 | +15.9% |
| 2025-08-29 | $0.8800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-30 | $0.8800 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-28 | $0.8800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-27 | $0.8800 | +35.4% |
| 2024-08-30 | $0.6500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-31 | $0.6500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-29 | $0.6500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-30 | $0.6500 | -84.0% |
| 2013-05-01 | $4.0600 | — |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Smart Money Flow
Institutional 13F filings from top hedge funds. Positions updated quarterly from SEC EDGAR.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares Change | % Change | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | -10,300 | -12.9% | Decreased |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | -212,200 | -39.2% | Decreased |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | +158,600 | +45.2% | Increased |
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | -1,300,300 | -28.3% | Decreased |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-Q1 | -1,514,700 | -78.7% | Decreased |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-Q1 | -13,426 | -34.0% | Decreased |
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | +64,454 | +7.9% | Increased |
| DE Shaw | 2025-Q4 | +709,339 | +675.2% | Increased |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2025-Q4 | +337,700 | +2617.8% | Increased |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | -588,500 | -11.3% | Decreased |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2025-Q4 | +421,100 | +28.0% | Increased |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2025-Q4 | +80,000 | +100.0% | New Position |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end. Not investment advice.
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLC or VOX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell TMUS shares regardless of T-Mobile US, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $16.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to TMUS through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in T-Mobile US, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with TMUS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 33 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
TMUS Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 13 TMUS shares, reducing daily market volatility.
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.7% of the State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) and 2.6% of the VOX (VOX). Across 33 tracked ETFs, approximately 85M shares (7.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest TMUS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 33 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
TMUS Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for T-Mobile US, Inc. over the past year sits near $197.96 (10% of 252-day volume). The current price of $188.83 sits 4.6% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
TMUS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does T-Mobile US, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
T-Mobile US, Inc. converts 49% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 51% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 9,668 | $190.85 | $1.8M |
| 2026-05-11 | 26,248 | $193.63 | $5.1M |
| 2026-05-08 | 6,055 | $194.20 | $1.2M |
| 2026-05-04 | 2,004 | $196.06 | $392,904.24 |
| 2026-05-01 | 16 | $195.50 | $3,128 |
| 2026-04-22 | 215,713 | $195.39 | $42.1M |
| 2026-04-20 | 200 | $197.67 | $39,534 |
| 2026-04-16 | 1 | $190.19 | $190.19 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $190.00 | $570 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $192.43 | $192.43 |
| 2026-04-13 | 14,624 | $195.71 | $2.9M |
| 2026-04-10 | 1 | $197.54 | $197.54 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2 | $200.54 | $401.08 |
| 2026-04-07 | 11,354 | $198.61 | $2.3M |
| 2026-03-30 | 10,902 | $210.82 | $2.3M |
| 2026-03-25 | 22,291 | $211.26 | $4.7M |
| 2026-03-24 | 22,343 | $208.76 | $4.7M |
| 2026-03-23 | 18,458 | $208.47 | $3.8M |
| 2026-03-20 | 16,261 | $206.59 | $3.4M |
| 2026-03-19 | 23,742 | $206.62 | $4.9M |
| 2026-03-13 | 12,799 | $214.37 | $2.7M |
| 2026-03-10 | 627 | $217.50 | $136,372.5 |
| 2026-03-09 | 1,280 | $221.57 | $283,609.6 |
| 2026-02-27 | 43 | $213.15 | $9,165.45 |
| 2026-02-24 | 3,947 | $219.95 | $868,142.65 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,231 | $215.46 | $265,231.26 |
| 2026-02-20 | 206 | $215.30 | $44,351.8 |
| 2026-02-17 | 1,878 | $219.50 | $412,221 |
| 2026-02-09 | 2,500 | $197.39 | $493,475 |
| 2026-01-30 | 3 | $189.28 | $567.84 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Institutional Holdings (13F Filings)
Raw SEC 13F-HR filings from institutional investment managers. Shows exact share counts and portfolio values as reported to the SEC.
| Fund | Quarter | Shares | Value ($K) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citadel Advisors | 2026-Q1 | 3,301,500 | $400,141,800K |
| DE Shaw | 2026-Q1 | 878,854 | $106,517,105K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2026-Q1 | 509,200 | $61,715,040K |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2026-Q1 | 410,500 | $49,752,600K |
| Millennium Management | 2026-Q1 | 329,600 | $39,947,520K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2026-Q1 | 69,700 | $8,447,640K |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2026-Q1 | 26,072 | $3,159,926K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q4 | 4,601,800 | $449,825,950K |
| Renaissance Technologies | 2025-Q4 | 1,925,200 | $188,188,300K |
| DE Shaw | 2025-Q4 | 814,400 | $79,607,600K |
| Millennium Management | 2025-Q4 | 541,800 | $52,960,950K |
| Point72 Asset Mgmt | 2025-Q4 | 350,600 | $34,271,150K |
| Two Sigma Investments | 2025-Q4 | 80,000 | $7,820,000K |
| Bridgewater Associates | 2025-Q4 | 39,498 | $3,860,929K |
| Citadel Advisors | 2025-Q3 | 5,190,300 | $465,569,910K |
Source: SEC 13F-HR filings. Values reported in thousands. 13F data is delayed ~45 days after quarter end.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| T | 0.632 | 0.666 | Moderate |
| VZ | 0.592 | 0.612 | Moderate |
| DUK | 0.379 | 0.394 | Moderate |
| WEC | 0.370 | 0.385 | Moderate |
| ERIE | 0.360 | 0.208 | Moderate |
| CMS | 0.354 | 0.296 | Moderate |
| AON | 0.342 | 0.199 | Moderate |
| PGR | 0.337 | 0.396 | Moderate |
| SO | 0.331 | 0.330 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare TMUS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.