ETF · Broad Market

XTL(XTL)

$208.52
+0.45%
Expense Ratio
$418M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is skewed towards Technology, which accounts for nearly 40% of its holdings, while Communication Services and Other sectors also have notable weightings. Geographically, it appears to be focused on developed markets, given the lack of explicit international exposure in the provided data. The market-cap profile is not explicitly stated, but the presence of mid-cap stocks like ANET and VSAT suggests that the fund may be positioned for growth.

The top holdings are concentrated among a small group of companies, with ANET being the largest single holding at 3.8%. This concentration risk could amplify any sector-specific or idiosyncratic risks in these individual stocks. Compared to the broader market, this portfolio has a higher Technology weighting and lower Communication Services exposure. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio would likely be one characterized by strong demand for technology products and services, while an unfavorable scenario might involve increased competition or regulatory headwinds in the sector.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:57:55.55991+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 72/100

The thematic alignment between the ETF's name and its actual holdings is moderately strong, with a clear concentration in technology infrastructure and connectivity. The top ten positions are dominated by firms specializing in optical networking, satellite communications, and data center hardware, which suggests a genuine focus on digital backbone assets rather than broad market exposure. However, the presence of several mega-cap telecommunications giants like Cisco Systems and AT&T introduces some noise into the pure-play narrative; these large blue chips often serve as stabilizers that dilute the volatility typical of niche thematic funds. While companies such as ViaVIty Solutions and Iridium Communications fit a communications theme well, their inclusion alongside massive incumbents indicates an attempt to balance growth potential with established revenue streams, potentially at the expense of strict sector purity.

Sector coherence is evident within the Technology segment, which accounts for nearly forty percent of assets under management, reflecting a deliberate tilt toward hardware and software enablers of digital transformation. The Communication Services allocation further supports this narrative by including satellite operators and network service providers that complement the core technology holdings. Nevertheless, the fund exhibits significant concentration risk with its top ten positions representing over forty-four percent of total exposure, creating vulnerability to idiosyncratic events affecting specific large-cap names like Cisco or AT&T. This heavy weighting means the portfolio's performance will be disproportionately influenced by a small group of issuers rather than being driven purely by sector-wide trends, distinguishing it from diversified broad-market indices but also limiting its ability to capture smaller thematic opportunities across the entire universe.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-19 18:28:04.324723+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of XTL reveals a distinct thematic focus on communications infrastructure and semiconductor equipment, with Technology holding the largest share at 38.5% followed by Communication Services at 14.2%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on companies that provide essential hardware and software solutions for network expansion rather than broad-based consumer internet services or traditional media. The presence of specific holdings like CIEN within the technology slice, alongside top positions in IRDM, VSAT, VIAV, and EXTR across both sectors, indicates a strategy targeting firms involved in 5G deployment, fiber optics, and satellite connectivity. This heavy weighting implies that the fund's performance will be heavily correlated with capital expenditure cycles in telecommunications operators and global demand for network modernization.

The concentration risk profile is notable given that the top ten holdings account for 43.2% of assets under management, while a single position in IRDM exceeds five percent. Such granularity suggests limited diversification within its niche, meaning portfolio volatility may track closely with earnings reports or regulatory shifts affecting just a handful of specialized vendors rather than the broader market. The overlap between sector definitions and top holdings further highlights that the fund does not strictly adhere to standard GICS classifications but instead clusters companies by their specific role in network infrastructure regardless of primary industry labeling. This approach creates a factor tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth stocks with high beta characteristics, as many names like VIAV and EXTR are often associated with cyclical industrial trends rather than defensive utility-like behavior.

Ultimately, the fund structure reflects a specialized play on the digital backbone of global connectivity, accepting higher idiosyncratic risk in exchange for exposure to niche industry tailwinds. The absence of significant allocations to consumer discretionary or financial services reinforces that this is not a general market proxy but a targeted vehicle for investors seeking specific infrastructure growth. As with any concentrated portfolio, returns will likely be amplified during periods of robust network spending while facing sharper drawdowns if regulatory headwinds or technological disruptions impact the core holdings disproportionately.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 17:40:46.263518+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XTL's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XTL's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B2466.5%
VGTVGT$122B1951.3%
ONEOONEO$25M1749.0%
VOXVOX$6B2045.3%
ESGVESGV$11B1134.3%

67% of XTL's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 28× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XTL's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXTL's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

16.5x
Weighted P/E
8.92x
Weighted P/B
$52B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 71% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000284
Well Diversified
Top 5: 17.7%Top 10: 34.4%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other44.4%Technology36.9%Communication Services18.7%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
100% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
5%
0–3 Weak
68%
4–6 Average
27%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
34%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
34% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XTL collectively pay out 34% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 30% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+74.4%
ETF 1Y Return
+26.0%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+48.5%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

XTL is up 74.4% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +26.0%. The remaining +48.5% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 87% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XTL's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

39% Creators
61% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)28.1%
Value Destroyers43.2%

Of XTL's analyzed weight, 39% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 61% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 71% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

26/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership7.8%
Most Crowded HoldingAD (26.7%)
Least CrowdedUI (0.1%)
Coverage87% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XTL has a Passive Crowding Score of 26/100. On average, 7.8% of the market capitalization of XTL's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 13 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration34.4%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1VSAT
VIASAT INC
3.71%
6/9
2ANET
ARISTA NETWORKS INC
Technology
3.68%
57.7x4/9
3EXTR
EXTREME NETWORKS INC
3.45%
252.8x6/9
4TMUS
T MOBILE US INC
Communication Services
3.45%
20.5x5/9
5FFIV
F5 INC
Technology
3.42%
33.1x7/9
6IRDM
IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC
3.39%
47.2x7/9
7MSI
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
Technology
3.34%
33.4x6/9
8CMCSA
COMCAST CORP CLASS A
Communication Services
3.34%
4.7x8/9
9CALX
CALIX INC
Technology
3.32%
78.3x6/9
10VISN
VISTANCE NETWORKS INC
3.32%
17.8x7/9
11GSAT
GLOBALSTAR INC
3.29%
4/9
12UI
UBIQUITI INC
Technology
3.24%
35.0x5/9
13ATEX
ANTERIX INC
Communication Services
3.20%
19.4x1/9
14T
AT+T INC
Communication Services
3.14%
7.4x6/9
15UNIT
UNITI GROUP INC
3.14%
2.5x5/9
The bottom 26 stocks in XTL account for only 49.6% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XTL’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 50.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT3.71%308,006
2ANET3.68%124,814
3EXTR3.45%662,779
4TMUS3.45%102,087
5FFIV3.42%48,475
6IRDM3.39%415,303
7MSI3.34%46,012
8CMCSA3.34%790,242
9CALX3.32%490,856
10VISN3.32%1,569,360
11GSAT3.29%235,862
12UI3.24%33,976
13ATEX3.20%194,150
14T3.14%816,123
15UNIT3.14%1,631,540

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 50.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT3.70%313,618
2ANET3.66%127,088
3ATEX3.49%197,688
4FFIV3.49%49,359
5EXTR3.45%674,855
6IRDM3.45%422,871
7CALX3.31%499,800
8VISN3.30%1,597,956
9TMUS3.27%103,947
10GSAT3.24%240,160
11MSI3.20%46,850
12CMCSA3.17%804,642
13UI3.15%34,596
14UNIT3.12%1,661,268
15CIEN3.11%44,366

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 49.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ANET3.81%128,225
2EXTR3.66%680,893
3VSAT3.60%316,424
4FFIV3.49%49,801
5ATEX3.43%199,457
6IRDM3.39%426,655
7CIEN3.26%44,763
8CALX3.21%504,272
9TMUS3.19%104,877
10MSI3.18%47,269
11VISN3.17%1,612,253
12GSAT3.16%242,309
13UI3.12%34,906
14CSCO3.12%163,803
15CMCSA3.06%811,841

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 50.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ANET3.80%128,225
2EXTR3.67%680,893
3VSAT3.60%316,424
4FFIV3.43%49,801
5IRDM3.39%426,655
6ATEX3.38%199,457
7CALX3.28%504,272
8CIEN3.26%44,763
9MSI3.24%47,269
10TMUS3.24%104,877
11VISN3.20%1,612,253
12CSCO3.20%163,803
13CMCSA3.19%811,841
14GSAT3.17%242,309
15UI3.09%34,906

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 50.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ANET3.85%128,225
2VSAT3.74%316,424
3EXTR3.69%680,893
4FFIV3.44%49,801
5IRDM3.43%426,655
6CIEN3.31%44,763
7CALX3.27%504,272
8VISN3.23%1,612,253
9ATEX3.23%199,457
10MSI3.21%47,269
11CSCO3.19%163,803
12TMUS3.16%104,877
13GSAT3.12%242,309
14UI3.09%34,906
15CMCSA3.07%811,841

2026-07-13

15 holdings · 49.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1ANET3.80%128,225
2EXTR3.59%680,893
3VSAT3.57%316,424
4IRDM3.46%426,655
5FFIV3.44%49,801
6ATEX3.42%199,457
7CIEN3.32%44,763
8VISN3.26%1,612,253
9CALX3.21%504,272
10MSI3.16%47,269
11NTCT3.13%434,771
12GSAT3.11%242,309
13CSCO3.11%163,803
14TMUS3.05%104,877
15UI3.05%34,906

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

25.2%
Annual Volatility
1.84
Sharpe (1Y)
1.22
Sharpe (3Y)
-22.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-37.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XTL Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.45%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.217%
+0.149%
+0.106%

Top Detractors

-0.043%
-0.045%
-0.110%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XTL’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1893 snapshots
Other44.4%
Technology36.9%
Communication Services18.7%
Change since 2026-03-30
Communication Services
+1.3%
Other
-1.0%
Technology
-0.2%
2026-03-302026-07-18

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

Comparing 2026-07-172026-07-180 buys, 41 sells

Positions Increased (0)

Positions Decreased (41)

SELL-
692K458K-235K (-33.9%)
0.08%(-0.04)
SELLLUMN
2.3M2.3M-42K (-1.8%)
2.53%(+0.01)
SELLONDS
2.1M2.0M-37K (-1.8%)
2.37%(-0.08)
SELLUNIT
1.7M1.6M-30K (-1.8%)
3.14%(+0.02)
SELLVISN
1.6M1.6M-29K (-1.8%)
3.32%(+0.02)
SELLGOGO
1.5M1.4M-26K (-1.8%)
0.90%(+0.02)
SELLLBTYK
1.2M1.2M-21K (-1.8%)
2.10%(+0.05)
SELLADTN
1.2M1.1M-21K (-1.8%)
2.32%(+0.03)

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.