Ubiquiti Inc. (UI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 37.6x earnings — a 42% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — UI is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 46.8. DCF fair value of $110 implies 88% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.72 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency of Ubiquiti Inc. is exceptionally robust, evidenced by a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 87.4%, which suggests the firm generates substantial excess returns relative to its cost of equity. This high ROIC is primarily driven by expansive profitability rather than financial leverage or asset turnover; specifically, a net margin of 27.7% and gross margin of 43.4% indicate powerful pricing power within the technology sector. While revenue growth accelerates at 33.5% year-over-year, reinforcing the DuPont decomposition's reliance on margins over volume, the Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 signals moderate financial stability rather than a pristine balance sheet trajectory. Furthermore, an Altman Z-Score of 46.8 and Beneish M-Score of -1.72 present conflicting quality indicators, with the latter suggesting low earnings manipulation risk despite the elevated valuation multiple compressing future upside potential from current fundamentals.
Valuation metrics currently reflect a significant premium that diverges sharply from historical norms and intrinsic value models. The stock trades at 63.3x forward earnings, exceeding both the sector average of 58.2x and its own five-year mean by approximately 95%, indicating the market is pricing in sustained hyper-growth rather than mature compounding. A discounted cash flow analysis anchors fair value at $110, implying an -88.4% downside from current levels if realized free cash flow growth fails to meet aggressive assumptions. This valuation gap suggests that while the implied ten-year FCF growth rate of 27.9% supports high multiple expansion in theory, any deviation from this trajectory would trigger a severe mean reversion toward historical averages or sector benchmarks.
The risk profile presents a dichotomy between operational momentum and valuation fragility. Although the company demonstrates strong revenue acceleration and low suspected earnings manipulation, the extreme distance between current pricing and DCF-derived fair value creates substantial downside volatility if growth rates decelerate even slightly below the 27.9% implied run rate. Investors must weigh whether the 87.4% ROIC can sustain indefinitely at these scale levels or if margin compression will erode the earnings power underpinning such a high multiple, leaving little room for error in execution relative to market expectations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 33% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $131 | $100 | $81 |
| 3% | $151 | $110 | $87 |
| 4% | $180 | $123 | $94 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $588.57.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $110 (-88.4%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 95% above its 5-year average P/E of 32.5x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-17 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-17 | $0.8000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-09-02 | $0.8000 | +33.3% |
| 2025-05-19 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-18 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-18 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-09-03 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-17 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-16 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-10 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
| 2023-09-01 | $0.6000 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like IYZ or XTL, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell UI shares regardless of Ubiquiti Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $50M of passive capital is structurally linked to UI through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on UI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Ubiquiti Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Cisco Systems Inc (CSCO) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with UI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
UI Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 1489 UI shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.2% of the IYZ (IYZ) and 2.1% of the XTL (XTL). Across 4 tracked ETFs, approximately 0M shares (0.1% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest UI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
UI Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Ubiquiti Inc. over the past year sits near $568.48 (16% of 252-day volume). The current price of $588.57 trades 3.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (16% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
UI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Ubiquiti Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Ubiquiti Inc. converts 73% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 1,001 | $703.49 | $704,193.49 |
| 2026-05-08 | 57 | $926.69 | $52,821.33 |
| 2026-04-13 | 12 | $925.70 | $11,108.4 |
| 2026-04-02 | 574 | $822.99 | $472,396.26 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,607 | $790.29 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-04 | 9 | $762.35 | $6,861.15 |
| 2026-02-13 | 34 | $706.08 | $24,006.72 |
| 2026-02-10 | 14 | $712.38 | $9,973.32 |
| 2026-02-06 | 1,142 | $576.00 | $657,792 |
| 2026-02-04 | 9 | $569.16 | $5,122.44 |
| 2026-02-02 | 38 | $551.42 | $20,953.96 |
| 2026-01-30 | 4 | $566.38 | $2,265.52 |
| 2026-01-29 | 85 | $554.74 | $47,152.9 |
| 2026-01-26 | 118 | $548.10 | $64,675.8 |
| 2026-01-23 | 53 | $562.45 | $29,809.85 |
| 2026-01-16 | 178 | $553.52 | $98,526.56 |
| 2026-01-15 | 920 | $558.04 | $513,396.8 |
| 2026-01-12 | 337 | $559.91 | $188,689.67 |
| 2026-01-07 | 4 | $569.57 | $2,278.28 |
| 2025-12-19 | 47 | $551.67 | $25,928.49 |
| 2025-11-24 | 11 | $530.62 | $5,836.82 |
| 2025-11-13 | 4,649 | $584.81 | $2.7M |
| 2025-11-03 | 18 | $787.18 | $14,169.24 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| KEYS | 0.446 | 0.491 | Moderate |
| COHR | 0.433 | 0.476 | Moderate |
| CAT | 0.431 | 0.501 | Moderate |
| FN | 0.425 | 0.469 | Moderate |
| CIEN | 0.424 | 0.539 | Moderate |
| ATEN | 0.414 | 0.410 | Moderate |
| TSM | 0.401 | 0.488 | Moderate |
| JCI | 0.396 | 0.420 | Moderate |
| TT | 0.391 | 0.492 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare UI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.