VISN (VISN)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 0.6. DCF fair value of $12 implies 37% downside based on model assumptions. Beneish M-Score of -1.25 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and severely compromised capital efficiency. While revenue growth of 39.7% and an extraordinary net margin of 118.2% suggest dominant pricing power or non-recurring gains, the ROIC-WACC spread of -9.3% indicates that the company is currently destroying value relative to its cost of capital. This negative spread persists despite a high Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a benign Beneish M-Score of -1.25, which typically signal financial strength and low earnings manipulation risk; however, an Altman Z-Score of 0.6 raises immediate concerns regarding long-term solvency and potential distress that the high margins may be masking through leverage or one-time items. The DuPont components are not explicitly broken down here, but the negative ROIC spread implies that either asset turnover is insufficiently efficient to compensate for capital costs, or financial leverage is distorting returns without generating true economic profit.
Valuation metrics reflect a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models derived from cash flow assumptions. The stock trades at 17.2x earnings, representing a massive 2023% premium over its five-year average of 0.8x and implying that the market is pricing in sustained high-growth trajectories far beyond historical norms. However, this optimism clashes directly with the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis, which assigns a fair value $12 lower than current prices, translating to an implied downside of -37.0%. This valuation gap suggests the market may be overpaying for growth expectations that are not yet reflected in normalized cash flows or free cash flow conversion rates, particularly given the tension between reported profitability and negative capital returns.
The risk profile appears bifurcated: strong operational indicators like high margins and a low manipulation score contrast sharply with solvency risks highlighted by the Altman Z-Score and value-destructive ROIC dynamics. Without explicit Fama-French alpha data or insider trading activity provided in the dataset, the primary uncertainty lies in whether current earnings quality can sustainably support the elevated multiple without triggering balance sheet stress as measured by the distress score. The combination of a deeply negative capital spread and a valuation that implies near-doubling from historical norms creates an environment where realized returns could diverge significantly from expectations if margin compression or liquidity constraints materialize.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 40% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 7.6% | 9.6% | 11.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $21 | $8 | $0 |
| 3% | $30 | $12 | $2 |
| 4% | $44 | $18 | $6 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $12.44.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=9.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (-37.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | $10.0000 | — |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XTL or VFMV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell VISN shares regardless of VISN's individual fundamentals. We estimate $85M of passive capital is structurally linked to VISN through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on VISN's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in VISN to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If VISN (VISN) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC (IRDM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with VISN. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
VISN Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 29 VISN shares, reducing daily market volatility.
VISN (VISN) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.9% of the XTL (XTL) and 0.4% of the VFMV (VFMV). Across 6 tracked ETFs, approximately 8M shares (3.4% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. As passive ownership grows, index inclusion changes may increasingly drive price discovery.
ETFs with Highest VISN Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
VISN Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for VISN over the past year sits near $17.90 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $12.44 sits 30.5% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
VISN Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does VISN convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
VISN converts 82% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 21,276 | $11.77 | $250,418.52 |
| 2026-05-04 | 80 | $11.93 | $954.4 |
| 2026-04-27 | 80 | $19.40 | $1,552 |
| 2026-04-21 | 3,656 | $19.11 | $69,866.16 |
| 2026-04-15 | 6,076 | $18.98 | $115,322.48 |
| 2026-04-14 | 21,992 | $19.30 | $424,445.6 |
| 2026-04-06 | 29,840 | $18.73 | $558,903.2 |
| 2026-04-01 | 598 | $18.20 | $10,883.6 |
| 2026-03-23 | 150 | $17.72 | $2,658 |
| 2026-03-18 | 16 | $17.82 | $285.12 |
| 2026-03-09 | 76,091 | $17.21 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-02 | 50 | $17.57 | $878.5 |
| 2026-02-19 | 224 | $18.91 | $4,235.84 |
| 2026-01-29 | 183 | $18.79 | $3,438.57 |
| 2026-01-21 | 159 | $18.01 | $2,863.59 |
| 2026-01-20 | 4,042 | $18.59 | $75,140.78 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| IDXX | 0.658 | 0.068 | Moderate |
| WSM | 0.376 | 0.411 | Moderate |
| VSAT | 0.343 | 0.530 | Moderate |
| BEN | 0.334 | 0.280 | Moderate |
| GS | 0.323 | 0.485 | Moderate |
| FIBK | 0.321 | 0.354 | Moderate |
| IR | 0.315 | 0.320 | Moderate |
| NVDA | 0.311 | 0.291 | Moderate |
| EXTR | 0.310 | 0.357 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare VISN to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.