Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 22.8x earnings — a 35% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — WSM is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 6.9. Near modeled fair value — DCF estimates $191 (-1%).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Williams-Sonoma, Inc. present a compelling dichotomy between operational efficiency and top-line stagnation. The company generates substantial value creation, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of +19.5%, indicating capital deployment significantly outpaces the cost of equity. This robust return is driven primarily by high profitability rather than volume; a net margin of 14.6% combined with strong gross margins suggests pricing power or premium brand positioning, even as revenue growth contracts slightly to -0.5%. The DuPont decomposition reveals that this 52.5% ROE relies heavily on financial leverage (Equity Multiplier at 2.47x) alongside solid asset turnover and margin quality. Credit metrics further reinforce structural integrity, with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signaling strong fundamentals, an Altman Z-Score of 7.0 denoting low bankruptcy risk, and a Beneish M-Score of -2.75 suggesting earnings are unlikely to be manipulated.
Despite these operational strengths, the current valuation appears disconnected from historical norms and sector peers. Trading at a P/E multiple of 20.4x, the stock commands a significant discount relative to the Consumer Cyclical sector average of 42.1x, implying the market may be pricing in persistent headwinds rather than acknowledging the wide ROIC spread. A DCF analysis suggests an implied fair value of $193, which serves as a critical benchmark for assessing whether current prices reflect realistic growth assumptions or excessive pessimism regarding future revenue trajectories. The divergence between the high quality metrics and the depressed multiple creates a scenario where valuation risk may be overstated relative to fundamental reality, though the market's discount must be justified by factors not captured in static efficiency measures.
Risk assessment is complicated by recent insider activity, which shows $16,980,652 in net selling over the last 90 days. This significant outflow contrasts with the strong financial health indicators and warrants scrutiny regarding management's view on near-term execution or capital allocation priorities. While the high-quality balance sheet and expansive ROIC-WACC spread provide a margin of safety against downside volatility, the combination of flat revenue growth and substantial insider selling suggests that internal confidence may not align with the attractive valuation metrics currently presented to investors.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 1% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.9% | 13.9% | 15.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $220 | $178 | $149 |
| 3% | $239 | $191 | $157 |
| 4% | $264 | $206 | $167 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $203.84.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $191 (-1.5%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 58% above its 5-year average P/E of 13.6x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-17 | $0.7600 | +15.2% |
| 2026-01-16 | $0.6600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-10-17 | $0.6600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-07-18 | $0.6600 | 0.0% |
| 2025-04-17 | $0.6600 | +15.8% |
| 2025-01-17 | $0.5700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-10-18 | $0.5700 | 0.0% |
| 2024-07-19 | $0.5700 | +0.9% |
| 2024-04-18 | $0.5650 | +25.6% |
| 2024-01-18 | $0.4500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-10-19 | $0.4500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-07-20 | $0.4500 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHB or XLY, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WSM shares regardless of Williams-Sonoma, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to WSM through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AMAZON.COM INC (AMZN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with WSM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
WSM Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 WSM shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 3.7% of the XHB (XHB) and 0.5% of the State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLY). Across 32 tracked ETFs, approximately 19M shares (16.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest WSM Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 32 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
WSM Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. over the past year sits near $188.09 (10% of 252-day volume). The current price of $203.84 trades 8.4% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
WSM Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Williams-Sonoma, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Williams-Sonoma, Inc. converts 64% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 18.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 13,188 | $182.10 | $2.4M |
| 2026-04-28 | 354 | $192.05 | $67,985.7 |
| 2026-04-20 | 100 | $198.69 | $19,869 |
| 2026-04-17 | 6,200 | $191.50 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-07 | 9,841 | $182.62 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-27 | 25 | $180.56 | $4,514 |
| 2026-03-26 | 4,139 | $181.93 | $753,008.27 |
| 2026-03-25 | 1,278 | $181.09 | $231,433.02 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1,397 | $178.42 | $249,252.74 |
| 2026-03-16 | 9 | $179.99 | $1,619.91 |
| 2026-02-27 | 9 | $211.38 | $1,902.42 |
| 2026-02-23 | 317 | $214.86 | $68,110.62 |
| 2026-02-17 | 18,530 | $214.57 | $4.0M |
| 2026-02-02 | 233 | $204.65 | $47,683.45 |
| 2026-01-20 | 250 | $211.51 | $52,877.5 |
| 2026-01-16 | 1,920 | $210.00 | $403,200 |
| 2026-01-02 | 1,575 | $178.59 | $281,279.25 |
| 2025-12-31 | 2 | $181.40 | $362.8 |
| 2025-12-16 | 613 | $185.43 | $113,668.59 |
| 2025-12-03 | 48 | $178.06 | $8,546.88 |
| 2025-11-19 | 12 | $180.75 | $2,169 |
| 2025-11-14 | 47 | $186.47 | $8,764.09 |
| 2025-11-12 | 30,104 | $191.49 | $5.8M |
| 2025-11-07 | 3,518 | $191.87 | $674,998.66 |
| 2025-10-22 | 5 | $190.91 | $954.55 |
| 2025-10-17 | 8 | $187.50 | $1,500 |
| 2025-10-16 | 1 | $190.06 | $190.06 |
| 2025-10-15 | 453 | $191.50 | $86,749.5 |
| 2025-10-10 | 1,474 | $189.29 | $279,013.46 |
| 2025-10-06 | 459 | $199.43 | $91,538.37 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| SWK | 0.670 | 0.666 | Moderate |
| KEY | 0.616 | 0.634 | Moderate |
| CFG | 0.613 | 0.615 | Moderate |
| HWC | 0.608 | 0.575 | Moderate |
| MC | 0.607 | 0.616 | Moderate |
| TROW | 0.601 | 0.528 | Moderate |
| WTFC | 0.600 | 0.612 | Moderate |
| USB | 0.599 | 0.587 | Moderate |
| GBCI | 0.595 | 0.582 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare WSM to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.