Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicIR trades at 48.4x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 44.7x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 3.5. DCF fair value of $58 implies 34% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Ingersoll Rand Inc. reveal a significant capital efficiency constraint, as the company generates an ROIC of 5.8% against a WACC of 11.6%, resulting in a negative spread that erodes intrinsic value over time. This weak return profile is driven by low asset turnover at just 0.42x, which suppresses overall equity returns despite healthy gross margins near 43.6%; the DuPont decomposition shows this weakness outweighs any leverage benefits from an equity multiplier of 1.80x. While financial stability metrics present a mixed picture with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 3.4 suggesting moderate distress risk, the Beneish M-Score of -2.57 indicates low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, these operational characteristics are being priced at a premium relative to historical norms and sector peers, creating a disconnect between current fundamentals and market valuation.
Valuation metrics suggest the stock is trading significantly above its calculated fair value, with a forward P/E of 53.7x exceeding the broader Industrials average of 44.2x by over 19%. This elevated multiple appears to rely on aggressive growth assumptions, as the DCF model implies a decade-long free cash flow expansion rate of 16.6% to justify current prices; however, this trajectory results in an estimated downside of approximately 25.5% from today's levels based on intrinsic value calculations. The market is currently pricing in exceptional future performance that contradicts the underlying capital allocation efficiency and negative ROIC-WACC spread, indicating potential overvaluation if growth expectations normalize to more realistic levels aligned with its current operational output.
Risk-adjusted return factors further complicate the investment thesis, as the stock exhibits a substantial Fama-French annual alpha of -14.67%, signaling persistent underperformance relative to risk-free benchmarks after adjusting for market exposure and other style factors. Although the security displays positive tilts toward value (HML: 0.378) and robust profitability (RMW: 0.509), these characteristics are insufficient to offset the negative alpha or address the capital destruction implied by the valuation gap. Compounding this technical weakness is a notable divergence in insider sentiment, characterized by net selling of $56.7 million over the last ninety days, which often precedes downward revisions in analyst expectations and may reflect management's view on current equity pricing versus long-term prospects.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 6% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.9% | 11.9% | 13.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $69 | $52 | $41 |
| 3% | $78 | $58 | $44 |
| 4% | $91 | $64 | $48 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $71.62.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $58 (-34.4%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 1% below its 5-year average P/E of 59.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price level of $70.91 for Ingersoll Rand Inc. sits within a broader context where the interplay between recent drawdowns and volatility suggests a fragile momentum rather than a robust structural shift. While specific technical indicators are absent from the provided dataset, the existence of a measurable drawdown implies that downward pressure has recently outweighed upward thrust, potentially eroding short-term confidence among market participants. In the Industrials sector, such price movements often signal heightened sensitivity to macroeconomic headwinds or supply chain disruptions, which can amplify volatility and make trend continuation precarious. The fundamental backdrop for industrial firms frequently dictates whether observed weakness is a temporary correction or a deeper value re-rating; however, without explicit earnings data or guidance in the input, one must assume that current price action reflects immediate market sentiment rather than long-term intrinsic changes. A significant drawdown combined with elevated volatility typically indicates that the asset's path of least resistance has tilted negative, creating an environment where technical support levels are under stress and any rebound may face substantial overhead supply. This dynamic suggests that while the stock possesses liquidity for traders to enter or exit positions, the prevailing risk dynamics favor caution as the balance between buyers and sellers appears skewed toward defensive positioning amidst sector-wide uncertainties.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2026-03-04 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-13 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-14 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-05-15 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-03-05 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-11-14 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-15 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-05-15 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2024-03-06 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-17 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
| 2023-08-22 | $0.0200 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XLI or VIS, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell IR shares regardless of Ingersoll Rand Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to IR through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Ingersoll Rand Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies CATERPILLAR INC (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with IR. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 26 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
IR Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 IR shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 0.5% of the State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI) and 0.5% of the VIS (VIS). Across 27 tracked ETFs, approximately 54M shares (13.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest IR Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 27 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
IR Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Ingersoll Rand Inc. over the past year sits near $80.39 (15% of 252-day volume). The current price of $71.62 sits 10.9% below the POC — suggesting potential mean-reversion upside if institutional demand reasserts at this level. The highly concentrated volume profile (15% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
IR Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Ingersoll Rand Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Ingersoll Rand Inc. converts 72% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.1%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 8 | $74.70 | $597.6 |
| 2026-05-08 | 12,788 | $77.50 | $991,070 |
| 2026-05-07 | 46 | $78.65 | $3,617.9 |
| 2026-05-04 | 3,539 | $77.99 | $276,006.61 |
| 2026-04-24 | 2,447 | $84.95 | $207,872.65 |
| 2026-04-21 | 17,508 | $86.01 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $88.32 | $264.96 |
| 2026-04-14 | 335 | $87.69 | $29,376.15 |
| 2026-04-13 | 25,985 | $85.38 | $2.2M |
| 2026-04-10 | 87 | $87.03 | $7,571.61 |
| 2026-04-09 | 124 | $84.67 | $10,499.08 |
| 2026-04-06 | 2,232 | $77.91 | $173,895.12 |
| 2026-03-27 | 4,908 | $81.39 | $399,462.12 |
| 2026-03-26 | 71,871 | $83.65 | $6.0M |
| 2026-03-25 | 36 | $83.15 | $2,993.4 |
| 2026-03-23 | 16,565 | $81.39 | $1.3M |
| 2026-03-20 | 9,815 | $82.16 | $806,400.4 |
| 2026-03-17 | 17,112 | $83.81 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-26 | 1 | $93.02 | $93.02 |
| 2026-02-13 | 31 | $94.21 | $2,920.51 |
| 2026-02-06 | 150 | $96.00 | $14,400 |
| 2026-02-05 | 2 | $97.41 | $194.82 |
| 2026-02-04 | 6,126 | $93.72 | $574,128.72 |
| 2026-02-03 | 4,931 | $88.94 | $438,563.14 |
| 2026-01-22 | 64,677 | $89.82 | $5.8M |
| 2026-01-15 | 324 | $85.99 | $27,860.76 |
| 2026-01-02 | 2 | $79.22 | $158.44 |
| 2025-12-26 | 585 | $81.57 | $47,718.45 |
| 2025-12-22 | 8,817 | $79.28 | $699,011.76 |
| 2025-12-19 | 4,886 | $78.85 | $385,261.1 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| ITW | 0.741 | 0.764 | High co-movement |
| DOV | 0.735 | 0.697 | High co-movement |
| EMR | 0.702 | 0.699 | High co-movement |
| PH | 0.690 | 0.656 | Moderate |
| NDSN | 0.686 | 0.710 | Moderate |
| SWK | 0.681 | 0.724 | Moderate |
| EMN | 0.649 | 0.513 | Moderate |
| GWW | 0.645 | 0.638 | Moderate |
| WAB | 0.641 | 0.705 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare IR to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.