ETF · Industrials

State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF(XLI)

$174.19
+1.04%
Expense Ratio
$28.3B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
91.0%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF maintains a highly concentrated exposure to the industrials sector, which accounts for over 91% of its portfolio weightings. This heavy tilt is evident in the top holdings list, where nine of the ten largest positions are classified strictly within this industry group, collectively driving significant capital allocation toward manufacturing and industrial services. The fund's asset base of $28.3 billion suggests substantial liquidity and institutional interest, yet the narrow sector focus inherently limits diversification benefits relative to broader market indices. While the vast majority of risk is concentrated in traditional heavy industries, a notable deviation appears with Uber holding nearly 3% of assets; its classification as a technology company introduces a minor but distinct thematic element that contrasts with the core industrial mandate.

Concentration analysis reveals that the top five holdings—Caterpillar, General Electric, GE Vernova, Raytheon Technologies, and Boeing—command approximately 24.2% of total assets under management. This clustering indicates that performance will be heavily influenced by macroeconomic factors affecting capital goods, aerospace, defense, and energy infrastructure simultaneously. The presence of multiple utility-scale industrial players alongside transportation leaders like Union Pacific underscores a reliance on cyclical economic drivers rather than defensive consumer staples or growth-oriented tech sectors beyond the single Uber position. Although technology comprises only 6.2% of sector weights, its inclusion through non-traditional industrials may provide some hedging against pure-play manufacturing downturns, though it does not fundamentally alter the fund's industrial beta profile.

Quantitatively, the structure implies that volatility will closely mirror broader industrial indices rather than offering independent risk-return characteristics found in multi-sector funds. The dominance of large-cap manufacturers means the ETF is likely to exhibit low turnover and high correlation with GDP growth trends affecting global supply chains. Investors observing this vehicle should recognize that it functions as a leveraged proxy for specific sub-sectors like aerospace, defense, and heavy machinery rather than a diversified equity solution. Any shift in economic cycles impacting these specific industries will be amplified due to the lack of offsetting positions in other sectors such as healthcare or financials within the top holdings framework.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 08:47:09.905962+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100

The State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF demonstrates a high degree of thematic alignment, as its top holdings are overwhelmingly concentrated within the Industrials sector. The fund maintains strict adherence to its stated theme by excluding broad-market technology giants or unrelated sectors that often dilute pure-play industrial funds. While UBER appears in the top ten with a classification of Technology, it represents a minor 2.8% position and does not significantly disrupt the core industrial focus established by the majority of the portfolio. The absence of mega-cap stocks from non-industrial categories suggests the fund manager is successfully filtering for companies directly involved in manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and construction rather than using broad market names to stabilize returns or chase unrelated trends.

Sector coherence remains robust with Industrials comprising 91.5% of assets, indicating that the portfolio's performance will be driven almost exclusively by industrial sector dynamics. The top-ten concentration of 40.5% reflects a diversified yet focused approach typical of sector-specific vehicles, avoiding the extreme single-stock risks often found in thematic active funds while maintaining exposure to key industry leaders like Caterpillar and General Electric. This structure ensures that the fund remains genuinely differentiated from broad market indices, which would necessarily include significant weights in consumer discretionary or financial services sectors absent here. The data confirms a disciplined strategy where sector weightings are consistent with the industrial theme, providing investors with a concentrated view of specific economic drivers without unnecessary exposure to unrelated industries.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-17 12:12:31.495097+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI) exhibits a highly concentrated portfolio structure, with Industrials comprising 91.2% of total assets and only six holdings representing the entire Technology allocation at 6.1%. This overwhelming weight in the primary sector suggests an investment thesis strictly focused on capturing industrial-specific economic cycles rather than seeking broad diversification or exposure to adjacent growth drivers like software or semiconductors. The fund's design reflects a deliberate choice to isolate performance within manufacturing, aerospace, and defense sub-sectors, effectively filtering out volatility from unrelated industries while simultaneously limiting the portfolio's ability to hedge against sector-wide downturns through asset class rotation.

Concentration risk is notably elevated given that the top five holdings account for approximately 26.5% of assets alone, with the broader top-10 concentration reaching 43%. This heavy reliance on a small number of large-cap entities such as Caterpillar and General Electric implies significant idiosyncratic risk; adverse news or operational challenges affecting just one or two of these major constituents could materially impact overall fund performance. The limited holding count of sixty-five further underscores this vulnerability, indicating that the fund lacks the dispersion typically found in broader market indices where hundreds of companies dilute individual stock influence.

In terms of factor tilts, the allocation heavily favors large-cap value characteristics inherent to established industrial giants rather than small-cap growth or high-beta momentum strategies often associated with cyclical recovery plays. The inclusion of technology stocks serves primarily as a minor satellite exposure within an otherwise traditional heavy-industry framework, likely intended to provide negligible beta adjustment without altering the core defensive-to-cyclical nature of the portfolio. Ultimately, this structure offers precise sector targeting but requires investors to accept substantial single-sector dependency and limited internal diversification as inherent features of the strategy.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 11:02:02.050516+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XLI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XLI's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B8099.9%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust$640B0.09%8099.9%
VISVIS$8B7999.9%
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF$1.5T0.03%7999.9%
VONEVONE$10B7398.7%

100% of XLI's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XLI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXLI's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

30.3x
Weighted P/E
12.69x
Weighted P/B
1.27%
Dividend Yield
$143B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 99% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000260
Well Diversified
Top 5: 26.2%Top 10: 40.2%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Industrials91.4%Technology6.1%Other2.6%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
100% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
1%
0–3 Weak
63%
4–6 Average
36%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
39%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.75%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
39% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XLI collectively pay out 39% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 88% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+22.5%
ETF 1Y Return
+23.5%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-1.0%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

XLI is up 22.5% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +23.5%. Price performance is closely aligned with fundamental earnings growth — valuations are roughly unchanged.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 100% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XLI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

55% Creators
45% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)53.2%
Value Destroyers43.9%

Of XLI's analyzed weight, 55% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 45% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 97% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

42/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership12.8%
Most Crowded HoldingFAST (20.2%)
Least CrowdedRSG (8.0%)
Coverage99% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XLI has a Passive Crowding Score of 42/100. On average, 12.8% of the market capitalization of XLI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 38 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration40.3%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1CAT
CATERPILLAR INC
Industrials
7.58%
43.7x6/9
2GE
GENERAL ELECTRIC
Industrials
5.96%
40.2x5/9
3GEV
GE VERNOVA INC
Industrials
5.29%
28.3x6/9
4RTX
RTX CORP
Industrials
4.43%
33.6x8/9
5BA
BOEING CO/THE
Industrials
3.25%
91.7x7/9
6UNP
UNION PACIFIC CORP
Industrials
2.96%
21.6x7/9
7UBER
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
Technology
2.85%
17.5x6/9
8ETN
EATON CORP PLC
Industrials
2.79%
39.2x7/9
9HON
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
Industrials
2.67%
38.0x5/9
10DE
DEERE + CO
Industrials
2.52%
30.7x5/9
11VRT
VERTIV HOLDINGS CO A
Industrials
2.33%
79.3x5/9
12PH
PARKER HANNIFIN CORP
Industrials
2.05%
31.2x7/9
13PWR
QUANTA SERVICES INC
Industrials
2.01%
98.0x5/9
14LMT
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
Industrials
1.99%
25.7x6/9
15HWM
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC
Industrials
1.96%
59.9x8/9
The bottom 66 stocks in XLI account for only 49.4% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XLI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 50.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.58%2,598,142
2GE5.96%5,856,650
3GEV5.29%1,505,058
4RTX4.43%7,495,710
5BA3.25%4,384,570
6UNP2.96%3,313,011
7UBER2.85%11,490,614
8ETN2.79%2,168,546
9HON2.67%3,544,736
10DE2.52%1,407,493
11VRT2.33%2,136,450
12PH2.05%704,697
13PWR2.01%832,840
14LMT1.99%1,130,819
15HWM1.96%2,239,234

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 50.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.58%2,598,142
2GE5.96%5,856,650
3GEV5.29%1,505,058
4RTX4.43%7,495,710
5BA3.25%4,384,570
6UNP2.96%3,313,011
7UBER2.85%11,490,614
8ETN2.79%2,168,546
9HON2.67%3,544,736
10DE2.52%1,407,493
11VRT2.33%2,136,450
12PH2.05%704,697
13PWR2.01%832,840
14LMT1.99%1,130,819
15HWM1.96%2,239,234

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 50.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.63%2,588,431
2GE5.92%5,834,758
3GEV5.19%1,499,429
4RTX4.41%7,467,682
5BA3.28%4,368,177
6UNP2.96%3,300,622
7UBER2.89%11,447,649
8ETN2.77%2,160,434
9DE2.66%1,402,228
10HON2.59%3,531,476
11VRT2.27%2,128,468
12PH2.04%702,058
13PWR1.99%829,733
14LMT1.99%1,126,594
15HWM1.97%2,230,862

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 50.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.61%2,581,708
2GE5.69%5,819,602
3GEV5.19%1,495,532
4RTX4.46%7,448,278
5BA3.21%4,356,828
6UNP3.06%3,292,045
7UBER2.90%11,417,904
8ETN2.75%2,154,818
9DE2.68%1,398,583
10HON2.62%3,522,296
11VRT2.35%2,122,942
12PH2.05%700,231
13LMT2.03%1,123,669
14PWR2.03%827,582
15HWM1.93%2,225,066

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 50.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.56%2,589,178
2GE5.64%5,836,442
3GEV5.13%1,499,862
4RTX4.44%7,469,838
5BA3.26%4,369,438
6UNP3.07%3,301,575
7UBER2.90%11,450,954
8ETN2.79%2,161,058
9DE2.67%1,402,633
10HON2.59%3,532,496
11VRT2.44%2,129,082
12PH2.04%702,261
13PWR2.03%829,972
14LMT2.01%1,126,919
15HWM1.94%2,231,506

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 50.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CAT7.74%2,566,021
2GE5.53%5,784,238
3GEV5.30%1,486,439
4RTX4.30%7,403,033
5BA3.24%4,330,347
6UNP3.01%3,272,032
7ETN2.90%2,141,714
8UBER2.89%11,348,499
9VRT2.66%2,110,048
10DE2.65%1,390,078
11HON2.53%3,500,907
12PWR2.15%822,563
13PH2.04%695,968
14LMT1.96%1,116,844
15HWM1.96%2,211,542

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

19.3%
Annual Volatility
1.85
Sharpe (1Y)
-13.4%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.

0.93
Market β
+0.121
Size (SMB)
Small-cap tilt
+0.121
Value (HML)
Value tilt
+0.004
Profit (RMW)
Neutral
+0.244
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): +9.51%
R²: 84.6%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XLI Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.04%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.122%
+0.072%
+0.049%

Top Detractors

-0.025%
-0.026%
-0.069%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The XLI ETF is trading below its 50-day moving average but above the 200-day moving average, indicating a potential consolidation phase. The RSI at 38.5 suggests that near-term momentum may be weak and leaning towards bearish territory, which typically ranges below 30 to 70 for neutral conditions.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.75%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XLI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2457 snapshots
Industrials91.4%
Technology6.1%
Other2.6%
Change since 2026-03-26
Industrials
+0.2%
Technology
-0.1%
2026-03-262026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.