Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicHWM trades at 59.9x earnings — a 34% premium to its sector average of 44.7x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 12.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). DCF fair value of $88 implies 66% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of HWM present a compelling dichotomy between superior capital efficiency and aggressive equity financing. The company demonstrates robust value creation potential, evidenced by an ROIC-WACC spread of 4.8%, indicating returns that comfortably exceed the cost of capital. This high-quality earnings profile is driven primarily by exceptional net margins at 18.3% rather than asset turnover or leverage, a strategy confirmed by a strong Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 12.1 signaling minimal distress risk. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals that this high ROE of 28.2% is leveraged through an equity multiplier of 2.09x, suggesting a reliance on debt to amplify returns, while the negative Profitability Factor (RMW) of -0.013 hints at recent profitability pressures despite historically strong gross margins near 34%.
Valuation metrics suggest significant market skepticism regarding future sustainability relative to current multiples. Trading at a P/E ratio of 62.9x, the stock commands a premium that vastly exceeds typical sector norms and implies an aggressive growth trajectory. This is quantified by a DCF fair value discount of approximately 60%, which conflicts sharply with the implied ten-year free cash flow growth rate of 27.8% embedded in the model. While the Fama-French Alpha stands out at an annualized 41.86%, reflecting strong momentum or specific factor exposure, the extreme valuation multiple indicates that the market has likely priced in perfection for a decade ahead, leaving little room for error if growth decelerates even marginally below the implied 27.8% CAGR.
Risk assessment highlights divergent signals between quantitative factors and insider behavior. The stock exhibits a distinct value tilt with an HML factor of 0.278 yet simultaneously trades at one of the highest valuations in its sector, creating a structural disconnect. More concerning is the net insider selling activity totaling over $11 million within the last ninety days; such significant outflows often precede periods of elevated volatility or strategic pivots when management lacks confidence in near-term execution relative to current share prices. The convergence of high valuation, substantial insider distribution, and negative profitability factor adjustments suggests a heightened risk-reward imbalance where downside protection may be limited despite strong historical fundamental scores.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 11% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.2% | 12.2% | 14.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $105 | $81 | $65 |
| 3% | $117 | $88 | $70 |
| 4% | $134 | $98 | $76 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $250.72.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $88 (-65.5%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 144% above its 5-year average P/E of 28.1x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current pricing structure for Howmet Aerospace Inc. at $259.89, situated within the Industrials sector, presents a snapshot where valuation levels must be weighed against underlying volatility and recent drawdown patterns to assess momentum durability. Without explicit trend lines or volume confirmation in the immediate dataset, the elevated price point suggests that market participants are pricing in significant recovery potential, yet this positioning inherently exposes the asset to sharper corrections if fundamental support falters. The interplay between a high current valuation and sector-wide cyclicality implies that any upward movement may be structurally fragile rather than sustainably driven by broad-based demand expansion. Risk dynamics here appear concentrated around the sustainability of recent gains; while the price action indicates strong bullish sentiment, the absence of corroborating data on moving averages or relative strength highlights a potential disconnect between short-term momentum and longer-term earnings fundamentals. A steep drawdown in similar industrial equities often precedes periods where technical breakouts fail to hold, suggesting that the current level could act as a pivot point rather than an inflection zone for sustained growth. Consequently, the market environment favors caution regarding the stability of this specific price formation, as external macroeconomic headwinds or sector rotation could rapidly erode the apparent strength seen in the immediate quote.
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | $0.1200 | 0.0% |
| 2026-02-06 | $0.1200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-11-07 | $0.1200 | 0.0% |
| 2025-08-08 | $0.1200 | +20.0% |
| 2025-05-09 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-02-07 | $0.1000 | +25.0% |
| 2024-11-08 | $0.0800 | 0.0% |
| 2024-08-09 | $0.0800 | +60.0% |
| 2024-05-09 | $0.0500 | 0.0% |
| 2024-02-08 | $0.0500 | 0.0% |
| 2023-11-09 | $0.0500 | +25.0% |
| 2023-08-03 | $0.0400 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ITA or IWP, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell HWM shares regardless of Howmet Aerospace Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $15.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to HWM through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Howmet Aerospace Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies GE Aerospace (GE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with HWM. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 32 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
HWM Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 7 HWM shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM) exerts measurable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 4.7% of the ITA (ITA) and 3.3% of the IWP (IWP). Across 28 tracked ETFs, approximately 59M shares (14.8% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest HWM Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 28 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
HWM Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Howmet Aerospace Inc. over the past year sits near $173.88 (12% of 252-day volume). The current price of $250.72 trades 44.2% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
HWM Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Howmet Aerospace Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Howmet Aerospace Inc. converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-11 | 400 | $270.56 | $108,224 |
| 2026-05-07 | 3,054 | $256.43 | $783,137.22 |
| 2026-05-04 | 2 | $239.51 | $479.02 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $258.03 | $774.09 |
| 2026-04-13 | 12 | $252.67 | $3,032.04 |
| 2026-04-07 | 129 | $236.57 | $30,517.53 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,201 | $230.46 | $276,782.46 |
| 2026-03-31 | 560 | $222.99 | $124,874.4 |
| 2026-03-30 | 5 | $227.90 | $1,139.5 |
| 2026-03-25 | 768 | $239.51 | $183,943.68 |
| 2026-03-24 | 10 | $236.04 | $2,360.4 |
| 2026-03-23 | 2 | $231.21 | $462.42 |
| 2026-03-20 | 356 | $232.94 | $82,926.64 |
| 2026-03-19 | 171 | $241.93 | $41,370.03 |
| 2026-03-17 | 262 | $240.73 | $63,071.26 |
| 2026-03-11 | 20 | $253.91 | $5,078.2 |
| 2026-03-10 | 240 | $254.14 | $60,993.6 |
| 2026-03-02 | 546 | $262.53 | $143,341.38 |
| 2026-02-17 | 501 | $250.21 | $125,355.21 |
| 2026-02-13 | 56,665 | $244.79 | $13.9M |
| 2026-02-09 | 45 | $223.16 | $10,042.2 |
| 2026-02-06 | 14,970 | $209.63 | $3.1M |
| 2026-02-04 | 1,444 | $213.49 | $308,279.56 |
| 2026-01-26 | 1,028 | $214.89 | $220,906.92 |
| 2026-01-08 | 86,747 | $210.90 | $18.3M |
| 2026-01-02 | 279 | $205.02 | $57,200.58 |
| 2025-12-29 | 119 | $211.22 | $25,135.18 |
| 2025-12-23 | 1,906 | $208.17 | $396,772.02 |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,809 | $203.49 | $368,113.41 |
| 2025-12-19 | 11,739 | $198.00 | $2.3M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
SEC Comment Letters
SEC correspondence with the company regarding their filings. Comment letters often flag disclosure deficiencies, accounting concerns, or material omissions.
Source: SEC EDGAR correspondence. Comment letters are public records of SEC staff review of company filings.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| GE | 0.711 | 0.779 | High co-movement |
| ATI | 0.710 | 0.702 | High co-movement |
| CRS | 0.637 | 0.634 | Moderate |
| CW | 0.628 | 0.706 | Moderate |
| PWR | 0.583 | 0.573 | Moderate |
| HEI | 0.557 | 0.632 | Moderate |
| WWD | 0.555 | 0.567 | Moderate |
| SARO | 0.536 | 0.611 | Moderate |
| FIX | 0.521 | 0.521 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare HWM to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.