Western Digital Corporation (WDC)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 31.8x earnings — a 51% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — WDC is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 9.5. DCF fair value of $21 implies 94% downside based on model assumptions.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe underlying economics present a stark dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While the company demonstrates robust revenue growth of 50.7% underpinned by healthy gross margins of 38.8%, this momentum is occurring within an ROIC-WACC spread of -2.1%. This negative spread indicates that current returns on invested capital fail to cover the cost of equity, suggesting value destruction despite the high reported net margin of 19.6%. The DuPont decomposition reveals a leverage-heavy structure with an equity multiplier of 2.53x driving a 33.6% ROE; however, this is counterbalanced by weak profitability signals in factor models (RMW: -0.484) and a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, which hints at potential financial fragility despite an Altman Z-score of 7.9 indicating low bankruptcy risk.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in significantly higher growth rates than implied by discounted cash flow analysis. The current P/E ratio of 27.9x stands in tension with a DCF fair value estimate that implies a -92.4% discount, highlighting a massive divergence between price and intrinsic value when assuming an unrealistic decade-long free cash flow growth rate of 37.5%. This discrepancy suggests the market may be overpaying for earnings without sufficient safety margins relative to fundamental performance. The negative Value Factor (HML: -0.035) further indicates that profitability characteristics are not commanding a premium, leaving valuation largely dependent on speculative future expansion rather than current operational quality.
Risk indicators point toward heightened uncertainty regarding ownership and factor exposure. Insider activity over the last 90 days shows net selling of approximately $28.7 million, signaling potential confidence issues among management or early stakeholders. Furthermore, while the Fama-French Alpha is anomalously high at 54.62% annually, this metric often reflects short-term pricing inefficiencies rather than sustainable outperformance, especially given the weak profitability factor score. The combination of negative capital spread, aggressive insider selling, and a valuation gap exceeding 90% creates a scenario where future downside risk may outweigh speculative upside potential if growth rates normalize below expectations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
Interactive5-year two-stage DCF. Terminal growth 3%. Default sliders match the pre-computed base case. Drag to explore scenarios. Not investment advice.
The growth rate the market implicitly expects over the next 10 years to justify today's price. Compare with historical growth of 51% YoY revenue.
Sensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 13.7% | 15.7% | 17.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $23 | $20 | $17 |
| 3% | $24 | $21 | $18 |
| 4% | $26 | $22 | $19 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs $563.10.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $21 (-94.1%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Currently trading 72% above its 5-year average P/E of 18.8x.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Dividend History
| Date | Amount | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-03-05 | $0.1250 | 0.0% |
| 2025-12-04 | $0.1250 | +25.0% |
| 2025-09-04 | $0.1000 | 0.0% |
| 2025-06-04 | $0.1000 | -73.5% |
| 2020-04-02 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2020-01-02 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2019-10-03 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2019-06-27 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2019-03-28 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2018-12-27 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2018-09-27 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
| 2018-06-28 | $0.3779 | 0.0% |
Dividend and split data from SEC filings and market data. Amounts are per share, not adjusted for splits. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ONEO or VLUE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell WDC shares regardless of Western Digital Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $21.2B of passive capital is structurally linked to WDC through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Western Digital Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Western Digital Corporation (WDC) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Micron Technology Inc (MU) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with WDC. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 35 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
WDC Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 WDC shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Western Digital Corporation (WDC) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 1.9% of the ONEO (ONEO) and 1.9% of the VLUE (VLUE). Across 31 tracked ETFs, approximately 59M shares (17.0% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest WDC Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
WDC Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Western Digital Corporation over the past year sits near $63.95 (18% of 252-day volume). The current price of $563.10 trades 780.5% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (18% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
WDC Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Western Digital Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Western Digital Corporation converts 66% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 80 | $494.09 | $39,527.2 |
| 2026-05-11 | 1,304 | $480.00 | $625,920 |
| 2026-05-08 | 316,089 | $463.91 | $146.6M |
| 2026-05-07 | 6 | $483.15 | $2,898.9 |
| 2026-05-06 | 55 | $465.26 | $25,589.3 |
| 2026-05-04 | 300 | $431.52 | $129,456 |
| 2026-04-30 | 177,278 | $412.76 | $73.2M |
| 2026-04-27 | 1,308 | $404.00 | $528,432 |
| 2026-04-20 | 10,125 | $372.52 | $3.8M |
| 2026-04-16 | 8,260 | $365.00 | $3.0M |
| 2026-04-13 | 3,100 | $343.43 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-10 | 447 | $337.88 | $151,032.36 |
| 2026-04-08 | 3 | $311.96 | $935.88 |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,648 | $294.97 | $486,110.56 |
| 2026-04-02 | 60 | $297.73 | $17,863.8 |
| 2026-03-30 | 433 | $275.34 | $119,222.22 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,775 | $273.35 | $485,196.25 |
| 2026-03-26 | 227 | $296.14 | $67,223.78 |
| 2026-03-25 | 34 | $301.05 | $10,235.7 |
| 2026-03-23 | 31,121 | $293.10 | $9.1M |
| 2026-03-20 | 2,392 | $316.93 | $758,096.56 |
| 2026-03-18 | 15,691 | $313.81 | $4.9M |
| 2026-03-17 | 723 | $286.21 | $206,929.83 |
| 2026-03-16 | 1,715 | $272.29 | $466,977.35 |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,776 | $259.03 | $460,037.28 |
| 2026-02-26 | 4,970 | $290.95 | $1.4M |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,418 | $285.52 | $404,867.36 |
| 2026-02-18 | 183 | $284.11 | $51,992.13 |
| 2026-02-12 | 7 | $273.74 | $1,916.18 |
| 2026-02-09 | 293 | $282.58 | $82,795.94 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| STX | 0.877 | 0.883 | High co-movement |
| SNDK | 0.668 | 0.728 | Moderate |
| MU | 0.641 | 0.715 | Moderate |
| LRCX | 0.605 | 0.659 | Moderate |
| TER | 0.585 | 0.681 | Moderate |
| KLAC | 0.542 | 0.597 | Moderate |
| CAT | 0.542 | 0.564 | Moderate |
| AMAT | 0.531 | 0.622 | Moderate |
| VRT | 0.531 | 0.570 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare WDC to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.