Sandisk Corporation (SNDK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicSNDK trades at 57.8x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 65.0x. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 20.4.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of SNDK reveal a stark dichotomy between top-line expansion and bottom-line erosion. While revenue growth remains robust at 10.4% year-over-year, the company is generating significant losses with a net margin of -22.3%, driven by an ROIC spread of -9.7%. The DuPont decomposition highlights that this negative return on equity stems primarily from poor profitability rather than inefficient asset utilization or excessive leverage; specifically, the low asset turnover ratio of 0.57x is offset slightly by a conservative equity multiplier of 1.41x. Despite these operational headwinds reflected in the Profitability Factor (RMW) score of -0.975 and a negative Piotroski F-Score component regarding profitability, the Beneish M-Score of -3.56 suggests management earnings manipulation is unlikely. The company maintains a moderate financial health profile with an Altman-inspired Piotroski score of 5/9, indicating resilience in liquidity and leverage despite current losses.
Valuation metrics present conflicting signals that require careful interpretation relative to historical norms and sector peers. Although specific P/E multiples are not provided due to negative earnings, the market appears to be pricing in substantial future growth potential given the company's ability to expand revenue while sustaining a gross margin of 30.1%. The Fama-French Alpha of 293.17% indicates that SNDK has significantly outperformed its risk-adjusted benchmark over the annual period, suggesting strong momentum independent of market beta. However, this alpha is heavily influenced by value factor exposure (HML: 0.798) rather than pure profitability drivers, implying current pricing may reflect a bet on mean reversion in margins or strategic restructuring rather than immediate earnings accretion.
Risk assessment highlights divergent trends between insider behavior and quantitative factor performance. Over the last ninety days, insiders have executed $2,196,360 in net selling, which often signals caution regarding near-term valuation levels or capital allocation priorities amidst ongoing losses. This insider activity contrasts sharply with the strong positive alpha generated by the stock's exposure to value characteristics. The combination of weak profitability metrics and active insider divestiture suggests that while the asset possesses unique growth attributes capable of generating exceptional risk-adjusted returns, there is notable skepticism from those closest to the business operations regarding its current financial trajectory.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Max drawdown = largest peak-to-trough decline. 1,200+ trading days.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this stock's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like SCHA or SMMD, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell SNDK shares regardless of Sandisk Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $18.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to SNDK through 8 tracked ETFs. This substantial passive exposure means that ETF inflows and outflows — not company fundamentals — can dominate daily volume on this stock.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Sandisk Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies NVIDIA CORP (NVDA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with SNDK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 24 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
SNDK Ownership Dynamics
Passive funds hold 1 in every 6 SNDK shares, reducing daily market volatility.
Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) exerts notable gravity on the passive index market, currently representing 2.2% of the SCHA (SCHA) and 2.0% of the SMMD (SMMD). Across 24 tracked ETFs, approximately 24M shares (16.2% of float) are held by passive funds and rarely trade on the open market. This level of passive ownership means index rebalances can create outsized volume events.
ETFs with Highest SNDK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 24 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
SNDK Institutional Volume Profile
252-day volume distribution by price level. The Point of Control (POC) marks — the price where the most institutional volume transacted — an implicit support/resistance floor.
The highest-volume price zone for Sandisk Corporation over the past year sits near $610.73 (20% of 252-day volume). The current price of $1716.36 trades 181.0% above this institutional floor — a sign of upside momentum, though a pullback to the POC zone is a common reversion target. The highly concentrated volume profile (20% at POC) indicates strong consensus on fair value — institutional participants have repeatedly transacted near this price.
Volume Profile computed from 252 trading days of OHLCV data. Volume allocated to price bins proportionally based on daily high-low range. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 7 | $1452.02 | $10,164.14 |
| 2026-05-12 | 832 | $1547.56 | $1.3M |
| 2026-05-11 | 2,400 | $1562.34 | $3.7M |
| 2026-05-07 | 55 | $1409.98 | $77,548.9 |
| 2026-05-04 | 6,481 | $1187.00 | $7.7M |
| 2026-05-01 | 300 | $1096.51 | $328,953 |
| 2026-04-27 | 1,685 | $989.90 | $1.7M |
| 2026-04-21 | 1 | $913.02 | $913.02 |
| 2026-04-17 | 2 | $919.47 | $1,838.94 |
| 2026-04-16 | 246 | $891.72 | $219,363.12 |
| 2026-04-15 | 4 | $944.46 | $3,777.84 |
| 2026-04-13 | 4,663 | $851.77 | $4.0M |
| 2026-04-10 | 50 | $851.57 | $42,578.5 |
| 2026-04-08 | 456 | $710.80 | $324,124.8 |
| 2026-04-06 | 19,153 | $701.59 | $13.4M |
| 2026-04-02 | 1,566 | $692.73 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,583 | $635.34 | $1.0M |
| 2026-03-31 | 289 | $572.50 | $165,452.5 |
| 2026-03-30 | 86 | $615.83 | $52,961.38 |
| 2026-03-25 | 10,155 | $702.48 | $7.1M |
| 2026-03-23 | 2,387 | $709.71 | $1.7M |
| 2026-03-20 | 3 | $772.09 | $2,316.27 |
| 2026-03-16 | 800 | $661.62 | $529,296 |
| 2026-03-13 | 38,679 | $618.82 | $23.9M |
| 2026-03-03 | 30 | $619.08 | $18,572.4 |
| 2026-03-02 | 4 | $635.36 | $2,541.44 |
| 2026-02-23 | 2,454 | $649.97 | $1.6M |
| 2026-02-20 | 65 | $621.09 | $40,370.85 |
| 2026-02-19 | 430 | $600.40 | $258,172 |
| 2026-02-17 | 100 | $626.56 | $62,656 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Price Correlations
Statistical correlation of daily returns with other stocks. High correlations indicate stocks that move together; negative correlations can offer diversification.
| Peer | 252-Day (1Y) | 126-Day (6M) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| WTGXX | NaN | NaN | |
| MU | 0.706 | 0.726 | High co-movement |
| WDC | 0.668 | 0.728 | Moderate |
| STX | 0.620 | 0.691 | Moderate |
| LRCX | 0.615 | 0.639 | Moderate |
| CIEN | 0.563 | 0.590 | Moderate |
| LITE | 0.535 | 0.547 | Moderate |
| MPWR | 0.508 | 0.590 | Moderate |
| FIX | 0.504 | 0.620 | Moderate |
| AMAT | 0.504 | 0.541 | Moderate |
Pearson correlation of daily log returns. 252d ≈ 1 trading year. Computed from price history. Not investment advice.
Compare SNDK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.