Stock vs Stock Comparison

Brinker International, Inc. vs ACV Auctions Inc.

EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 7–1.

EAT
ACVA

🏆 Tale of the Tape

71
EATACVA
7.1%Profitability (Net Margin)-8.7%
13.7xValuation (P/E)
20.2%Efficiency (ROIC)-6.6%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
4.1Safety (Altman Z)
21.9%Growth (Rev YoY)19.2%
6.22xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.53x
6.51%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricEATACVA
Market Cap$6.0B
P/E Ratio13.7x
Forward P/E11.0x
P/B15.55x
Dividend Yield
Beta1.36

Quantitative Metrics

MetricEATACVA
DCF Fair Value$165.06$3.96
DCF Upside
Piotroski F8/96/9
Altman Z4.10
Beneish M-2.92-2.93
FCF Yield6.51%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.5x
ROIC20.2%-6.6%
WACC12.7%
ROIC – WACC7.6pp
Gross Margin18.3%52.4%
Net Margin7.1%-8.7%
Rev Growth YoY21.9%19.2%
Sharpe (1Y)
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio

EAT Price

Loading chart...

ACVA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

EAT found in:

SLYG0.72%
SPSM0.35%
VTWO0.20%
VBK0.20%
VCR0.15%
VXF0.08%
VB0.08%
SPTM0.01%

ACVA found in:

VBK0.03%
VIS0.01%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

EAT vs ACVA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) and ACV Auctions Inc. (ACVA) represent two companies in the Consumer Cyclical sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, EAT leads 7–1 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, EAT generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 20.2% compared to ACVA's -6.6%. This suggests EAT is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

EAT appears in 8 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while ACVA appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, EAT or ACVA?

Our quantitative analysis compares EAT and ACVA across nine fundamental dimensions. EAT wins the Tale of the Tape 7–1. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are EAT and ACVA correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.