ETF · Broad Market

IDU(IDU)

$110.95
+1.71%
Expense Ratio
$1.6B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
75.1%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The IDU ETF presents a highly concentrated exposure to the utilities sector, which accounts for nearly half of its total assets under management. This heavy weighting is driven by significant top-holdings concentration among major utility providers such as NextEra Energy, Southern Company, and Duke Energy, each commanding substantial individual positions within the portfolio. The dominance of this single industry suggests that the fund's performance will be inextricably linked to regulatory environments, energy commodity prices, and capital expenditure cycles specific to the power generation and distribution space rather than broader market diversification.

Geographically, while the provided data does not explicitly detail country-level breakdowns, the composition of top holdings implies a primary focus on North American markets where these entities operate their core business operations. The inclusion of industrial giants like Waste Management alongside utility behemoths indicates that the fund seeks stability through established infrastructure and regulated cash flows rather than high-growth technology or financial exposure. With six of the ten largest positions dedicated exclusively to utilities, the portfolio exhibits a deliberate tilt toward defensive characteristics typical of capital-intensive industries with predictable revenue streams.

Quantitatively, the sheer size of the top five holdings relative to total assets underscores an aggressive concentration strategy that may amplify volatility during sector-specific downturns while potentially offering outsized gains during utility bull markets. The fund's structure appears designed for investors seeking deep immersion in the regulated energy landscape rather than broad-based market participation or hedging against industrial cyclicality, given that industrials represent only a small fraction of the overall allocation. This specific makeup requires careful consideration regarding how well the portfolio aligns with an investor's risk tolerance and view on long-term utility sector dynamics without providing any directional guidance on future price movements.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 06:28:59.257944+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100

The investment theme implied by the IDU ticker and its market positioning aligns exceptionally well with the actual portfolio composition, as the fund is overwhelmingly concentrated within the utilities sector. The top ten holdings consist almost entirely of major utility companies, reinforcing a clear focus on regulated energy infrastructure rather than broader industrial or technology themes often associated with similar capital-intensive sectors. There are no significant deviations where unrelated industries dilute the thematic purity; even the single holding in industrials represents a minor diversification that does not obscure the primary objective of exposure to power generation and distribution assets.

Sector coherence is high, with utilities accounting for nearly half of the total portfolio weight while maintaining distinct separation from other market segments. The concentration risk profile indicates a deliberate strategy targeting specific utility leaders rather than mirroring broad-market index behavior, as evidenced by the heavy weighting in established players like NextEra Energy and Southern Company compared to diversified industrial peers. This structure suggests the fund is designed for investors seeking targeted exposure to the energy transition narrative within regulated utilities, offering a differentiated return profile that relies on sector-specific dynamics rather than general market beta.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 01:11:39.273574+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The IDU ETF exhibits a highly concentrated sector allocation dominated by utilities, which account for nearly half of the portfolio at 48.2%. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on stable cash flows and regulated returns typically associated with utility infrastructure rather than broad market exposure or growth-oriented sectors. The top five holdings are almost exclusively drawn from this single industry, with four major players alone comprising over 30% of total assets, indicating a deliberate focus on large-cap, established entities within the power generation and distribution space. This structure implies that performance will be tightly correlated with commodity prices like natural gas or electricity rates, as well as regulatory decisions affecting the utility sector, while offering limited diversification benefits from other economic drivers.

Significant concentration risk is evident given that the top ten holdings represent more than 53% of the fund's assets, creating a scenario where idiosyncratic events within these specific companies could disproportionately impact overall returns. The inclusion of only one industrial holding among the largest positions further underscores the narrow scope of this strategy, effectively isolating it from broader manufacturing or capital goods trends that might influence other utility-adjacent equities. While the presence of a single industrials holding provides a minor thematic link to infrastructure spending, its 5.1% weight is insufficient to materially alter the fund's primary risk profile. Consequently, the portfolio appears designed for investors seeking specific exposure to regulated asset classes rather than those prioritizing sector diversification or factor tilts toward value or momentum across multiple industries.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 13:42:48.335152+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share IDU's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of IDU's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares$2.1T0.03%1053.4%
ONEOONEO$25M1053.4%
VONEVONE$10B1053.4%
IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF$762B0.03%1053.4%
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF$80B1053.4%

53% of IDU's portfolio by weight is also held by VTI, which commands 1271× more assets under management. When VTI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IDU's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIDU's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

23.7x
Weighted P/E
4.34x
Weighted P/B
2.13%
Dividend Yield
$106B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000338
Well Diversified
Top 5: 35.0%Top 10: 52.5%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Utilities90.3%Industrials9.7%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
53% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
0%
0–3 Weak
39%
4–6 Average
14%
7–9 Strong

Based on 53% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
90%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
1.95%
TTM Yield
At Risk
Dividend Durability
90% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside IDU collectively pay out 90% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is stretched — a prolonged earnings slump could force constituent companies to cut dividends. Based on 26% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+7.2%
ETF 1Y Return
-1.5%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+8.7%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

IDU is up 7.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -1.5%. The remaining +8.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 53% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of IDU's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

90% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)5.1%
Value Destroyers48.2%

Of IDU's analyzed weight, 10% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 90% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 53% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

HIGH
12.2%
Largest Holding
NEE
24.6%
Top 3 Weight
28
Effective # of Stocks
43%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
NEE
SO
DUK
Other 5 stocks

NEE at 12.2% contributes an estimated 43% of portfolio variance.IDU holds 10 stocks but behaves like an 28-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

HIGH

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

50/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership15.1%
Most Crowded HoldingETR (17.3%)
Least CrowdedWM (12.9%)
Coverage53% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

IDU has a Passive Crowding Score of 50/100. On average, 15.1% of the market capitalization of IDU's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 31 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration53.4%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1NEE
NextEra Energy Inc
Utilities
12.22%
22.1x5/9
2SO
Southern Co
Utilities
6.38%
23.5x4/9
3DUK
Duke Energy Corp
Utilities
6.03%
18.9x7/9
4CEG
Constellation Energy Corp
Utilities
5.84%
25.0x6/9
5WM
Waste Management Inc
Industrials
5.15%
30.6x8/9
6AEP
American Electric Power Co Inc
Utilities
4.39%
18.7x5/9
7SRE
Sempra
Utilities
3.72%
30.3x6/9
8D
Dominion Energy Inc
Utilities
3.29%
19.7x7/9
9VST
Vistra Corp
Utilities
3.20%
26.8x4/9
10ETR
Entergy Corp
Utilities
3.13%
27.9x6/9

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how IDU’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

2026-05-23

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

2026-05-22

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

2026-05-21

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

2026-05-20

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

2026-05-19

10 holdings · 53.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NEE12.22%
2SO6.38%
3DUK6.03%
4CEG5.84%
5WM5.15%
6AEP4.39%
7SRE3.72%
8D3.29%
9VST3.20%
10ETR3.13%

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

16.3%
Annual Volatility
1.22
Sharpe (1Y)
0.62
Sharpe (3Y)
-17.2%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-24.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove IDU Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.71%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.168%
+0.154%
+0.067%

Top Detractors

-0.030%
-0.155%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price of $113.59 for IDU establishes a baseline from which short-term momentum and trend alignment can be evaluated, though specific moving average positions are not provided in the available dataset to confirm whether the asset is trading above or below its key averages without further data points. In the absence of explicit RSI values or historical price action relative to these benchmarks, any assessment of immediate bullish or bearish pressure remains theoretical rather than factually derived from the supplied figures. A complete technical picture typically requires observing if the current level sustains against dynamic support lines and whether momentum oscillators indicate overbought or oversold conditions that might signal a potential reversal or continuation. Without concrete indicators such as the direction of the 50-day or 200-day moving averages, it is impossible to definitively state if the prevailing trend supports upward movement or suggests downward pressure based solely on this single price data point. Similarly, while RSI is often used to gauge short-term velocity and potential exhaustion in a trade, its specific reading here is unknown, leaving the status of immediate momentum ambiguous. Analysts would need additional context regarding recent volatility, volume profiles, and precise oscillator readings before forming a view on whether the asset exhibits strong directional strength or faces resistance that could limit further gains near this $113.59 level.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

1.95%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How IDU’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2456 snapshots
Utilities90.3%
Industrials9.7%
Change since 2026-03-30
Industrials
-0.3%
Utilities
+0.3%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.