BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 22.7x earnings — a 30% discount to the sector average of 32.6x — BJ is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 4.8 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedBJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. demonstrates robust fundamental quality characterized by a positive ROIC-WACC spread of +5.4%, indicating that the firm generates returns on invested capital significantly exceeding its cost of capital. This operational efficiency is underpinned by strong financial health metrics: a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 signals exceptional balance sheet stability and earnings consistency, while an Altman Z-Score of 4.8 places the company well within safe territory regarding bankruptcy risk. The Beneish M-Score of -2.86 further suggests low probability of financial statement manipulation. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals a margin-constrained model; despite solid revenue growth of 4.7% and an impressive gross margin of 18.6%, net margins remain thin at just 2.7%. This indicates that earnings power is currently driven more by volume expansion than pricing leverage or asset turnover optimization compared to peers with higher operating leverage.
Valuation analysis presents a divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow models, which imply a fair value of $40. The stock trades at a forward P/E multiple of 22.7x, which is notably compressed relative to the sector average of 33.9x. This valuation discount may reflect investor skepticism regarding the sustainability of low net margins or concerns over future growth acceleration in the consumer defensive space. While the current multiple offers some protection against downside volatility given the company's high-quality fundamentals, the gap between implied fair value and market price suggests potential for re-rating if margin expansion materializes or if sector multiples normalize.
The risk/reward profile appears favorable from a fundamental quality perspective but remains sensitive to macroeconomic headwinds that could impact discretionary spending patterns typical of wholesale clubs. The combination of high Piotroski scores and low manipulation indicators reduces tail risks associated with accounting fraud, yet the thin net margin leaves limited room for error in cost management during inflationary periods. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation discount adequately compensates for the lack of top-line leverage or if it represents an undervaluation opportunity given the company's strong capital allocation efficiency and defensive sector positioning.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $51 | $34 | $25 |
| 3% | $66 | $40 | $28 |
| 4% | $96 | $48 | $31 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $40 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XRT or MDYV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BJ shares regardless of BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $805M of passive capital is structurally linked to BJ through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BJ's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Walmart Inc. (WMT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with BJ. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 15 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BJ Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest BJ Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BJ Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. converts 30% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 70% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.4% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 5,748 | $95.00 | $546,060 |
| 2026-05-13 | 1,003 | $92.01 | $92,286.03 |
| 2026-04-30 | 1,604 | $91.43 | $146,653.72 |
| 2026-04-29 | 50 | $92.19 | $4,609.5 |
| 2026-04-27 | 742 | $94.31 | $69,978.02 |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,028 | $96.96 | $99,674.88 |
| 2026-04-22 | 1,154 | $96.00 | $110,784 |
| 2026-04-10 | 24,888 | $93.66 | $2.3M |
| 2026-03-04 | 2 | $100.25 | $200.5 |
| 2026-03-03 | 721 | $99.73 | $71,905.33 |
| 2026-02-25 | 103 | $98.94 | $10,190.82 |
| 2026-02-20 | 5,543 | $99.19 | $549,810.17 |
| 2026-02-04 | 123 | $95.80 | $11,783.4 |
| 2026-01-28 | 19,130 | $95.46 | $1.8M |
| 2026-01-23 | 7 | $96.00 | $672 |
| 2026-01-20 | 257 | $93.40 | $24,003.8 |
| 2026-01-15 | 1,194 | $95.93 | $114,540.42 |
| 2026-01-14 | 13,031 | $95.41 | $1.2M |
| 2026-01-12 | 39 | $89.94 | $3,507.66 |
| 2025-12-26 | 4 | $94.48 | $377.92 |
| 2025-12-24 | 11,939 | $93.57 | $1.1M |
| 2025-12-22 | 33,499 | $94.66 | $3.2M |
| 2025-12-18 | 179 | $95.91 | $17,167.89 |
| 2025-12-15 | 4,263 | $93.16 | $397,141.08 |
| 2025-12-11 | 741 | $89.61 | $66,401.01 |
| 2025-12-03 | 14,369 | $91.26 | $1.3M |
| 2025-12-02 | 388 | $88.62 | $34,384.56 |
| 2025-12-01 | 488 | $89.23 | $43,544.24 |
| 2025-11-26 | 337 | $89.31 | $30,097.47 |
| 2025-11-24 | 90,760 | $91.61 | $8.3M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare BJ to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.