Stock vs Stock Comparison

BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. vs Costco Wholesale Corporation

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3.

BJ
COST$961.83

🏆 Tale of the Tape

36
BJCOST
2.7%Profitability (Net Margin)2.9%
22.7xValuation (P/E)49.8x
13.3%Efficiency (ROIC)21.7%
8/9Health (Piotroski F)6/9
4.8Safety (Altman Z)10.0
4.7%Growth (Rev YoY)8.2%
Risk (Sharpe 1Y)-0.05
2.42xBalance Sheet (D/E)1.64x
2.45%FCF Yield1.80%

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricBJCOST
Market Cap$13.0B$424.1B
P/E Ratio22.7x49.8x
Forward P/E20.3x42.3x
P/B5.88x25.65x
Dividend Yield0.61%
Beta0.330.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricBJCOST
DCF Fair Value$39.63$576.10
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F8/96/9
Altman Z4.8010.02
Beneish M-2.86-2.66
FCF Yield2.45%1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA0.3x-0.6x
ROIC13.3%21.7%
WACC7.9%10.8%
ROIC – WACC5.4pp10.9pp
Gross Margin18.6%12.8%
Net Margin2.7%2.9%
Rev Growth YoY4.7%8.2%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio28%

BJ Price

Loading chart...

COST Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

BJ found in:

XRT1.43%
MDYV0.74%
VDC0.53%
VFQY0.39%
SPMD0.36%
MDY0.36%
ONEV0.33%
VBR0.28%
ONEO0.21%
VB0.16%
VXF0.15%
VONV0.03%
ESGV0.03%
SPTM0.02%
VONG0.01%

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

BJ vs COST: Head-to-Head Analysis

BJ's Wholesale Club Holdings, Inc. (BJ) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 6–3 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, BJ generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 13.3% compared to COST's 21.7%. This suggests COST is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

BJ appears in 15 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while COST appears in 35 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, BJ or COST?

Our quantitative analysis compares BJ and COST across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 6–3. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are BJ and COST correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.