Stock vs Stock Comparison

Costco Wholesale Corporation vs Afya Limited

COST wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4.

COST$954.27
AFYA

🏆 Tale of the Tape

54
COSTAFYA
2.9%Profitability (Net Margin)20.3%
49.8xValuation (P/E)
21.7%Efficiency (ROIC)12.1%
6/9Health (Piotroski F)8/9
10.0Safety (Altman Z)
8.2%Growth (Rev YoY)11.9%
-0.05Risk (Sharpe 1Y)
1.64xBalance Sheet (D/E)0.91x
1.80%FCF Yield

Green = winner in each category. Higher is better except P/E (lower = cheaper).

Fundamentals

MetricCOSTAFYA
Market Cap$424.1B
P/E Ratio49.8x
Forward P/E42.3x
P/B25.65x
Dividend Yield0.61%
Beta0.91

Quantitative Metrics

MetricCOSTAFYA
DCF Fair Value$576.10$430.99
DCF Upside-41.3%
Piotroski F6/98/9
Altman Z10.02
Beneish M-2.66-2.69
FCF Yield1.80%
Net Debt/EBITDA-0.6x0.5x
ROIC21.7%12.1%
WACC10.8%
ROIC – WACC10.9pp
Gross Margin12.8%64.5%
Net Margin2.9%20.3%
Rev Growth YoY8.2%11.9%
Sharpe (1Y)-0.05
Max Drawdown 3Y
FCF Payout Ratio28%

COST Price

Loading chart...

AFYA Price

Loading chart...

ETF Exposure

COST found in:

VDC12.27%
XLP9.78%
IYC4.26%
MGV2.23%
QQQ2.10%
VIG2.03%
SCHG1.70%
VFQY1.64%
SPYV1.62%
IWF1.60%
IVE1.58%
XRT1.51%
VONG1.45%
VFMV1.40%
VUG1.32%
QUS1.27%
ESGV0.89%
DGRW0.82%
VOO0.73%
SPY0.73%
SCHX0.72%
SPLG0.69%
VONE0.68%
SPTM0.67%
SCHB0.67%
IVV0.65%
VTI0.65%
ITOT0.58%
URTH0.52%
ACWI0.43%
VT0.40%
SDY0.23%
RSP0.21%
GWX0.11%
ONEO0.04%

AFYA found in:

EWX0.02%
SPEM0.00%

More Comparisons

Quant metrics computed from financial statements and 1,200+ trading days. Correlation is Pearson coefficient on daily log returns. Not investment advice.

COST vs AFYA: Head-to-Head Analysis

Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Afya Limited (AFYA) represent two companies in the Consumer Defensive sector. In our quantitative Tale of the Tape scoring, COST leads 5–4 across nine fundamental and risk metrics including profitability, valuation, capital efficiency, and financial health.

In terms of capital efficiency, COST generates a return on invested capital (ROIC) of 21.7% compared to AFYA's 12.1%. This suggests COST is more effective at deploying capital to generate shareholder returns.

COST appears in 35 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB, while AFYA appears in 2 ETFs. Investors holding broad-market ETFs may already have indirect exposure to both stocks.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which stock is the better investment, COST or AFYA?

Our quantitative analysis compares COST and AFYA across nine fundamental dimensions. COST wins the Tale of the Tape 5–4. However, stock selection depends on your individual risk tolerance, time horizon, and portfolio context. These metrics are computed from SEC filings and market data — they are not investment recommendations.

Are COST and AFYA correlated?

Correlation data is not yet available for this pair. Check back after both stocks have sufficient trading history.

How is the Tale of the Tape scored?

The Tale of the Tape compares both stocks across nine categories: profitability (net margin), valuation (P/E), efficiency (ROIC), health (Piotroski F-Score), safety (Altman Z-Score), growth (revenue YoY), risk (Sharpe ratio), leverage (debt-to-equity), and cash generation (FCF yield). The stock that wins more categories takes the overall score. Lower P/E and lower debt-to-equity count as wins.