BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. (BTSG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBTSG trades at 87.0x earnings — a 34% premium to its sector average of 65.2x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.4 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of BrightSpring Health Services reveal a stark divergence between aggressive top-line expansion and deteriorating capital efficiency. While revenue growth accelerates at 28.2% year-over-year, the return on invested capital sits at just 5.1%, significantly trailing the weighted average cost of capital by -10.3%. This negative spread indicates that new investments are currently destroying value rather than generating alpha. The DuPont decomposition suggests this underperformance stems from a razor-thin net margin of 1.5% and low gross margins of 11.8%, despite high leverage implied by the Altman Z-Score of 3.4, which borders on financial distress territory. However, qualitative strength is evident in the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a robust Beneish M-Score of -2.60, signaling strong fundamentals with low likelihood of earnings manipulation that counterbalance the capital allocation inefficiencies.
Valuation metrics present an extreme premium disconnected from intrinsic value models. The current price-to-earnings ratio of 87.0x trades at more than double the sector average of 37.0x, implying the market is pricing in sustained perfection rather than reflecting historical norms or peer multiples. This disconnect is further highlighted by a DCF fair value calculation returning $0, suggesting that under current assumptions regarding cash flow generation and discount rates, the stock's price vastly exceeds its intrinsic worth. The combination of high valuation multiples with negative ROIC-WACC spreads indicates significant downside risk if growth decelerates or margins compress further.
The risk/reward profile appears skewed heavily toward downside potential given the capital destruction metrics. While the low Beneish M-Score offers some assurance regarding financial statement integrity, the fundamental inability to generate returns above the cost of equity creates a structural headwind for long-term shareholder value. Investors must weigh the impressive revenue growth trajectory against the reality that current pricing assumes flawless execution in an environment where capital allocation is actively eroding equity value.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 13.4% | 15.4% | 17.4% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $1 | $0 | $0 |
| 3% | $2 | $0 | $0 |
| 4% | $3 | $1 | $0 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.4%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $0 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHS or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BTSG shares regardless of BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $463M of passive capital is structurally linked to BTSG through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BTSG's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. (BTSG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HUMANA INC (HUM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with BTSG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 11 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BTSG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest BTSG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 11 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BTSG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc. converts 86% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-10.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-30 | 2,304 | $48.15 | $110,937.6 |
| 2026-04-29 | 16 | $47.49 | $759.84 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,151 | $47.27 | $101,677.77 |
| 2026-04-10 | 15 | $45.92 | $688.8 |
| 2026-04-09 | 160 | $46.31 | $7,409.6 |
| 2026-03-26 | 23,374 | $44.82 | $1.0M |
| 2026-03-25 | 46,639 | $43.31 | $2.0M |
| 2026-03-24 | 72,762 | $42.10 | $3.1M |
| 2026-03-23 | 100 | $41.21 | $4,121 |
| 2026-03-19 | 73,611 | $43.07 | $3.2M |
| 2026-03-18 | 10,000 | $42.10 | $421,000 |
| 2026-03-16 | 353 | $38.31 | $13,523.43 |
| 2026-03-11 | 8,149 | $41.34 | $336,879.66 |
| 2026-03-06 | 77,454 | $41.77 | $3.2M |
| 2026-03-05 | 10,179 | $41.96 | $427,110.84 |
| 2026-03-04 | 151,479 | $40.65 | $6.2M |
| 2026-02-27 | 5,667 | $40.13 | $227,416.71 |
| 2026-02-19 | 62 | $41.15 | $2,551.3 |
| 2026-02-04 | 9,092 | $39.02 | $354,769.84 |
| 2026-01-13 | 2,360 | $39.01 | $92,063.6 |
| 2026-01-12 | 10,515 | $37.53 | $394,627.95 |
| 2026-01-07 | 2,418 | $40.67 | $98,340.06 |
| 2025-12-29 | 1,763 | $37.75 | $66,553.25 |
| 2025-12-22 | 1,838 | $37.49 | $68,906.62 |
| 2025-12-15 | 9,772 | $36.54 | $357,068.88 |
| 2025-12-12 | 130 | $35.90 | $4,667 |
| 2025-12-02 | 64 | $35.90 | $2,297.6 |
| 2025-12-01 | 58 | $36.16 | $2,097.28 |
| 2025-11-26 | 203 | $36.22 | $7,352.66 |
| 2025-11-24 | 35 | $34.59 | $1,210.65 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare BTSG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.