Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicCboe Global Markets, Inc.'s P/E of 26.9 is above its sector average (19.2x), though accompanied by a 10.6% economic spread (ROIC − WACC). Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 6.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Cboe Global Markets exhibit robust capital efficiency, evidenced by an 18.4% ROIC that significantly outperforms typical cost of equity thresholds. The return on equity decomposition reveals a high-quality earnings profile driven primarily by superior operational leverage rather than financial engineering; a net margin of 23.3% and asset turnover of 0.51x generate the bulk of returns, supported moderately by an equity multiplier of 1.81x. This structural strength is corroborated by rigorous integrity metrics: a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicates strong financial health with minimal deterioration in operating conditions, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.96 strongly suggests the absence of earnings manipulation risks.
Valuation analysis presents a notable divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at a P/E multiple of 26.9x, the stock commands a substantial premium over its sector average of 18.0x, implying that investors are pricing in aggressive future growth expectations beyond historical norms. However, discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $1,075, which provides a quantitative anchor against which to assess whether current levels fully reflect this implied growth trajectory or contain an expansion multiple risk premium.
Recent insider activity introduces a counterweight to the otherwise positive fundamental picture; net selling totaling approximately $1.63 million over the last 90 days signals potential divergence between management's immediate liquidity needs and their long-term conviction at these specific price levels. While the company demonstrates high-quality earnings generation and low manipulation risk, the combination of an elevated valuation multiple relative to peers and active insider outflows warrants close monitoring as investors weigh whether current prices adequately compensate for future execution risks or if a mean reversion in multiples is probable.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.8% | 9.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $1077 | $726 | $529 |
| 3% | $1401 | $856 | $592 |
| 4% | $2048 | $1054 | $678 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $856 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like ONEV or VOE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CBOE shares regardless of Cboe Global Markets, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $4.6B of passive capital is structurally linked to CBOE through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Cboe Global Markets, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B (BRK.B) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CBOE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CBOE Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CBOE Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CBOE Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Cboe Global Markets, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. converts 97% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 10.6% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 4,181 | $355.80 | $1.5M |
| 2026-05-12 | 23 | $350.48 | $8,061.04 |
| 2026-05-04 | 844 | $326.96 | $275,954.24 |
| 2026-04-14 | 4 | $300.30 | $1,201.2 |
| 2026-04-08 | 2,031 | $295.64 | $600,444.84 |
| 2026-04-01 | 146 | $281.07 | $41,036.22 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,729 | $279.79 | $483,756.91 |
| 2026-03-25 | 11 | $283.09 | $3,113.99 |
| 2026-03-24 | 3,271 | $280.62 | $917,908.02 |
| 2026-03-20 | 195 | $284.41 | $55,459.95 |
| 2026-03-17 | 34 | $291.78 | $9,920.52 |
| 2026-03-10 | 628 | $299.20 | $187,897.6 |
| 2026-03-02 | 9,000 | $299.72 | $2.7M |
| 2026-02-27 | 13 | $292.30 | $3,799.9 |
| 2026-02-25 | 177 | $292.94 | $51,850.38 |
| 2026-02-23 | 21,174 | $288.68 | $6.1M |
| 2026-02-17 | 695 | $275.11 | $191,201.45 |
| 2026-02-12 | 3,106 | $268.64 | $834,395.84 |
| 2026-02-11 | 38,970 | $274.07 | $10.7M |
| 2026-01-28 | 62,756 | $268.04 | $16.8M |
| 2026-01-21 | 17,694 | $271.92 | $4.8M |
| 2026-01-20 | 100 | $273.55 | $27,355 |
| 2026-01-12 | 850 | $260.95 | $221,807.5 |
| 2026-01-08 | 43 | $255.16 | $10,971.88 |
| 2026-01-05 | 1,530 | $248.11 | $379,608.3 |
| 2025-12-31 | 1,847 | $254.54 | $470,135.38 |
| 2025-12-26 | 181 | $255.96 | $46,328.76 |
| 2025-12-24 | 106 | $254.76 | $27,004.56 |
| 2025-12-22 | 71 | $247.27 | $17,556.17 |
| 2025-12-19 | 1,684 | $248.67 | $418,760.28 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CBOE to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.