Technology

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH)

$29.3B
Market Cap
13.3
P/E Ratio
0.98
Beta
2.21%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 5.9 SafeBeneish M -2.52 CleanROIC−WACC +5.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 13.3x earnings — a 80% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — CTSH is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 5.9 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation reveal a capital allocation profile that starkly contrasts with its sector peers. While the company generates value through an ROIC-WACC spread indicative of efficient operations, supported by a robust Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a clean Beneish M-Score of -2.52 suggesting low earnings manipulation risk, it relies heavily on financial leverage to drive returns rather than operational intensity or pricing power. The DuPont decomposition highlights this structural reliance: an equity multiplier of 1.38x amplifies the modest asset turnover of 1.02x and net margin of 10.6% into a total ROE of 14.8%. This leverage-dependent growth model, coupled with revenue expansion limited to 7.0% year-over-year, presents a distinct risk/reward asymmetry compared to high-growth peers that typically utilize organic volume drivers.

Valuation metrics indicate the market is pricing in significantly lower multiple compression relative to the broader technology sector average of 57.8x, resulting in a current P/E of only 13.3x. This substantial discount suggests investors are not anticipating rapid acceleration in profitability or margin expansion at this time, despite the company's solid fundamentals and low distress risk as indicated by its financial scores. A DCF analysis implies an intrinsic fair value of $90, which provides a quantitative anchor for assessing whether current market pricing adequately compensates for the growth constraints inherent in the business model. The divergence between the conservative valuation multiples and the defensive quality metrics creates a scenario where downside protection may be structurally embedded within the price, though upside remains tethered to the ability to convert this low multiple into higher earnings per share over time.

Recent insider activity adds another layer of nuance to the investment thesis, with net selling totaling $1,172,948 over the past 90 days. While not necessarily indicative of a fundamental deterioration given the company's high F-Score and negative M-Score, this flow suggests management may view current valuations or future growth prospects as less attractive than historical levels. The combination of insider disposition, moderate revenue growth, and leverage-driven ROE implies that while the stock offers defensive characteristics relative to its sector, capital appreciation will likely depend on a re-rating driven by improved operational efficiency rather than multiple expansion.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8.8%10.8%12.8%
2%$106$82$67
3%$121$90$72
4%$141$100$77

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $90 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

13.3x
CTSH P/E
65.0x
Sector Avg
-80%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
5.9
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.52
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

33.7%
Gross Margin
10.6%
Net Margin
16.3%
ROIC
10.8%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +5.5%— Positive value creation spread.
+7.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-0.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
2.6B
Free Cash Flow
24%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

10.6%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
1.02x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.38x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
14.8%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.38x
Debt / Equity
2.14x
Current Ratio
95.0x
Interest Coverage
-0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
9.29%
FCF Yield
4.1B
EBITDA

Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)

Net Insider Flow
-$1M
Net Selling
0
Buy Transactions
8
Sale Transactions
2026-03-16KERDMAN ALINASold 3/5 qtrsSale$7,962
2026-03-13AYYAR BALU GANESHOther8,619 shares
2026-03-13KIM JOHN SUNSHINSold 3/5 qtrsOther12,619 shares
2026-03-13KERDMAN ALINASold 3/5 qtrsOther200 shares
2026-03-13GUMMADI SURYA KUMARISold 3/5 qtrsOther12,353 shares

Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.20
Act: $1.23
+2.5%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $1.26
Act: $1.31
+4.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $1.30
Act: $1.39
+6.7%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.32
Act: $1.35
+2.0%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.9
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.94
Price/Book
7M
Avg Volume
$87.03
52W High
$58.84
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$5.0B
Tracked Passive Exposure
8
ETFs Holding CTSH
0.07%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$6.7T
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like ONEV or XSW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CTSH shares regardless of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $5.0B of passive capital is structurally linked to CTSH through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

CTSH Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
CTSHEpicenterVTIETFVOOETFIVVETFWDCLow RiskCMILow RiskSLBLow RiskFLEXMed RiskCRHLow Risk
CTSH Price Drop (%)0

If Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation (CTSH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Western Digital Corp. (WDC) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with CTSH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

CTSH Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
CTSH

Float lock-up computed from 30 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

CTSH Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$2.6B
EBITDA
$4.1B
FCF Conversion
64%
Reinvestment Rate
36%
64% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
16.3%
ROIC − WACC Spread
5.5%

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation converts 64% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 5.5% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1313,551$47.73$646,789.23
2026-05-071,302$51.33$66,831.66
2026-05-0642,044$51.87$2.2M
2026-05-0172,923$52.90$3.9M
2026-04-289$54.63$491.67
2026-04-233,706$58.81$217,949.86
2026-04-208$61.30$490.4
2026-04-17193$60.53$11,682.29
2026-04-164$60.39$241.56
2026-04-151,028$60.04$61,721.12
2026-04-0114$61.35$858.9
2026-03-3016$59.73$955.68
2026-03-2548$60.24$2,891.52
2026-03-24497$61.94$30,784.18
2026-03-23172,100$62.07$10.7M
2026-03-172$61.05$122.1
2026-03-091,618$66.26$107,208.68
2026-03-06826$65.78$54,334.28
2026-03-05826$65.12$53,789.12
2026-03-0227,837$64.43$1.8M
2026-02-2616$61.33$981.28
2026-02-243,122$61.13$190,847.86
2026-02-1866$65.18$4,301.88
2026-02-1243$70.91$3,049.13
2026-02-105$74.60$373
2026-02-064$76.84$307.36
2026-02-04144,908$74.50$10.8M
2026-01-30107,097$82.45$8.8M
2026-01-2914$83.30$1,166.2
2026-01-287,136$84.65$604,062.4

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare CTSH to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.