Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 22.7x earnings — a 65% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — DGX is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.4 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Quest Diagnostics present a capital allocation profile where the ROIC-WACC spread of +1.2% indicates modest but positive value creation, though it falls short of high-growth equity thresholds. The DuPont decomposition reveals that an ROE of 13.6% is primarily driven by financial leverage (Equity Multiplier at 2.23x) rather than operational efficiency or pricing power, as evidenced by a relatively low asset turnover of 0.68x and net margins capped at 9.0%. Despite this structural reliance on leverage, the balance sheet exhibits resilience with an Altman Z-Score of 3.4 suggesting safety from bankruptcy, while the strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and negative Beneish M-Score of -2.67 signal robust financial health and low earnings manipulation risk.
Valuation metrics suggest a significant discount relative to peer groups, with the current P/E of 22.7x trading well below the sector average of 36.8x. This compression implies the market is pricing in slower growth trajectories or specific execution risks not yet reflected in the DCF fair value estimate of $180. The divergence between implied growth from the discounted cash flow model and current multiple expansion suggests potential mean reversion, although the gap also creates a margin of safety for long-term holders if operational leverage can be unlocked to support higher net margins without increasing asset bases further.
However, insider activity introduces a notable counterweight to the attractive valuation thesis; $10,644,426 in net selling over the last 90 days indicates that management or major shareholders are reducing exposure despite the stock's undervaluation relative to historical norms and sector peers. This flow delta necessitates caution, as it may reflect private information regarding future headwinds not captured in current public models, potentially limiting near-term upside even if long-term fundamentals remain sound.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $236 | $150 | $104 |
| 3% | $313 | $180 | $119 |
| 4% | $466 | $226 | $138 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $180 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XHS or XLV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell DGX shares regardless of Quest Diagnostics Incorporated's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.1B of passive capital is structurally linked to DGX through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Quest Diagnostics Incorporated to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ELI LILLY + CO (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DGX. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 30 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DGX Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest DGX Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 31 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
DGX Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Quest Diagnostics Incorporated convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Quest Diagnostics Incorporated converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 2,927 | $190.84 | $558,588.68 |
| 2026-04-29 | 537 | $195.05 | $104,741.85 |
| 2026-04-28 | 31 | $196.63 | $6,095.53 |
| 2026-04-15 | 3 | $194.16 | $582.48 |
| 2026-04-02 | 47 | $197.69 | $9,291.43 |
| 2026-03-26 | 2,598 | $196.46 | $510,403.08 |
| 2026-03-25 | 11 | $196.08 | $2,156.88 |
| 2026-03-23 | 16,937 | $195.26 | $3.3M |
| 2026-03-13 | 3,065 | $200.88 | $615,697.2 |
| 2026-03-06 | 1,931 | $203.98 | $393,885.38 |
| 2026-02-17 | 442 | $206.87 | $91,436.54 |
| 2026-02-10 | 4 | $191.25 | $765 |
| 2026-02-06 | 63 | $192.30 | $12,114.9 |
| 2026-02-05 | 14,277 | $189.23 | $2.7M |
| 2026-01-21 | 97,043 | $188.95 | $18.3M |
| 2026-01-20 | 5 | $189.49 | $947.45 |
| 2026-01-15 | 52 | $186.77 | $9,712.04 |
| 2026-01-12 | 144 | $174.44 | $25,119.36 |
| 2025-12-30 | 1,277 | $175.52 | $224,139.04 |
| 2025-12-26 | 1,779 | $175.92 | $312,961.68 |
| 2025-12-22 | 18,935 | $176.06 | $3.3M |
| 2025-12-15 | 4,159 | $182.56 | $759,267.04 |
| 2025-11-19 | 6,394 | $185.32 | $1.2M |
| 2025-11-12 | 20,008 | $188.85 | $3.8M |
| 2025-11-04 | 1,173 | $178.84 | $209,779.32 |
| 2025-10-27 | 12 | $182.18 | $2,186.16 |
| 2025-10-14 | 5,072 | $182.78 | $927,060.16 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare DGX to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.