Enbridge Inc. (ENB)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 23.3x earnings — a 33% discount to the sector average of 34.8x — ENB is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 0.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of ENB reveal a distinct tension between high growth momentum and capital allocation inefficiency. While the company demonstrates robust top-line expansion with revenue surging 21.9% year-over-year, supported by healthy gross margins at 33.0%, its ability to generate value is constrained by a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -1.4%. This indicates that current investments are destroying shareholder value relative to the cost of capital. The DuPont decomposition highlights this dynamic: although net margins remain solid at 11.5% and leverage provides an equity multiplier of 3.35x, driving an ROE of 11.5%, it is achieved primarily through low asset turnover of just 0.30x rather than operational efficiency or superior returns on deployed capital.
Valuation metrics suggest the market may be pricing in aggressive future growth that current fundamentals do not yet support. The stock trades at a P/E multiple of 23.3x, which must be weighed against an Altman Z-Score of 0.8, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk and potential financial fragility despite strong revenue trends. Conversely, the Beneish M-Score of -2.51 offers reassurance regarding earnings quality, suggesting management is unlikely to be manipulating results to inflate this valuation multiple. The divergence between a high-growth narrative reflected in the P/E ratio and a capital-destructive spread creates a complex risk profile where current profitability metrics mask underlying inefficiencies in asset utilization.
The Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates moderate financial strength, yet it does not fully offset the structural concerns raised by negative value creation. Investors must reconcile the apparent earnings quality with the reality that every dollar reinvested currently yields less than its cost of capital. The combination of low asset turnover and a negative spread suggests that unless operating leverage improves significantly or asset efficiency increases, future growth rates may struggle to justify current equity valuations without substantial margin expansion or multiple compression.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
⚠️ Dividend consumes >80% of FCF — sustainability risk.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VYMI or VEA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ENB shares regardless of Enbridge Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to ENB through 7 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Enbridge Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Enbridge Inc. (ENB) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ENB. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 7 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ENB Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ENB Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ENB Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Enbridge Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Enbridge Inc. converts 15% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 85% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 86,511 | $54.84 | $4.7M |
| 2026-05-12 | 236,869 | $54.46 | $12.9M |
| 2026-05-11 | 373 | $53.59 | $19,989.07 |
| 2026-05-08 | 373 | $53.99 | $20,138.27 |
| 2026-05-07 | 1,076 | $54.20 | $58,319.2 |
| 2026-05-06 | 147,104 | $54.91 | $8.1M |
| 2026-05-05 | 4,028 | $54.72 | $220,412.16 |
| 2026-05-04 | 1,340 | $54.83 | $73,472.2 |
| 2026-05-01 | 87,672 | $55.42 | $4.9M |
| 2026-04-27 | 21,974 | $53.30 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-24 | 1,608 | $52.50 | $84,420 |
| 2026-04-22 | 18,691 | $51.85 | $969,128.35 |
| 2026-04-21 | 68,642 | $52.24 | $3.6M |
| 2026-04-20 | 500 | $52.67 | $26,335 |
| 2026-04-16 | 22,507 | $52.61 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-15 | 186 | $52.99 | $9,856.14 |
| 2026-04-13 | 58 | $54.32 | $3,150.56 |
| 2026-04-09 | 166 | $54.48 | $9,043.68 |
| 2026-04-08 | 12,309 | $54.38 | $669,363.42 |
| 2026-04-07 | 192 | $53.74 | $10,318.08 |
| 2026-04-06 | 17,717 | $54.15 | $959,375.55 |
| 2026-04-02 | 11,677 | $53.65 | $626,471.05 |
| 2026-03-30 | 685 | $54.58 | $37,387.3 |
| 2026-03-27 | 1,160 | $54.50 | $63,220 |
| 2026-03-26 | 54,699 | $54.48 | $3.0M |
| 2026-03-25 | 47,457 | $54.44 | $2.6M |
| 2026-03-20 | 139,790 | $54.07 | $7.6M |
| 2026-03-19 | 1,706 | $53.24 | $90,827.44 |
| 2026-03-17 | 5,613 | $54.54 | $306,133.02 |
| 2026-03-16 | 483 | $54.08 | $26,120.64 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ENB to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.