VYMI(VYMI)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards other sectors, with nearly two-thirds of its holdings categorized as "other", which could imply a diverse mix of industries and companies. However, this also means that no single sector dominates the fund's composition. Financial services and energy are the next largest exposures, but they account for only around 9% combined. This suggests a relatively balanced approach to sector allocation.
The top holdings reveal a mix of large-cap international stocks, with several European and Asian companies represented in the top ten. The presence of HSBA, ROP, and NOVN from Europe, alongside NESN from Japan and CBA from Australia, indicates a global investment strategy. The weighted P/E ratio of 15.1x suggests that the portfolio is trading at a relatively reasonable valuation multiple compared to historical averages.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 08:09:17.207392+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100The investment theme implied by the ETF name suggests a focus on global mega-cap equities, yet the actual portfolio composition reveals a significant divergence from pure thematic purity. While several top holdings like HSBA and RY are indeed massive entities within their respective regions, the inclusion of stocks such as NOVN (a small Spanish tech firm) and NESN alongside traditional industrial giants creates a hybrid profile that blends broad market exposure with specific sector bets. The presence of multiple holdings marked "N/A" in terms of clear thematic categorization indicates that the fund's construction relies heavily on size metrics rather than strict adherence to a singular growth or innovation narrative, effectively using large-cap status as a proxy for stability across disparate industries like energy and materials.
Sector coherence presents another layer of complexity regarding the fund's differentiation from standard broad-market indices. Although Financial Services dominates with 5.6% weighting, this is spread thinly across fifteen holdings rather than concentrated in leaders that would define a pure financial theme. The sector breakdown shows a fragmented approach where Energy, Basic Materials, and Technology each hold minimal weightings relative to their global counterparts, suggesting the fund captures a slice of every major industry simply because those sectors contain large companies. Consequently, while the portfolio avoids extreme concentration with a top-10 holding limit of 13.2%, it lacks the distinct sector tilt that would clearly separate its performance from a diversified global index, resulting in an allocation that prioritizes size over specific thematic exposure.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 21:22:35.298324+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation profile of VYMI reveals a distinct lack of exposure to the dominant growth engines typically found in modern equity markets, with Technology and Communication Services representing merely 2.1% combined. Instead, the fund's composition is heavily skewed toward Financial Services at 5.6%, followed by Energy at 3.4% and Basic Materials at 1.6%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on traditional economic pillars rather than innovation or digital transformation, potentially aiming to capture value from established industries that may be undervalued relative to high-growth sectors. The minimal presence of Consumer Defensive, Healthcare, and Industrials further indicates a deliberate avoidance of defensive hedges or stable cash-flow generators often sought during periods of market volatility.
Concentration risk appears manageable given the Top-10 holdings account for only 13.2% of assets, implying a broad dispersion across smaller positions rather than reliance on a few large-cap leaders. However, this breadth is somewhat superficial due to the low number of underlying securities in many sectors; for instance, Technology and Communication Services are represented by just four and two holdings respectively. The inclusion of specific names like HSBA alongside sector-specific entities such as ROP and NOVN highlights a potential reliance on international or niche exposures that may not align with standard domestic market benchmarks. While the low top-10 concentration mitigates single-stock risk, the overall structure reflects a highly specialized mandate that diverges significantly from diversified broad-market strategies, leaving the portfolio vulnerable to underperformance if traditional sectors fail to outperform their modern counterparts.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 14:29:38.333049+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VYMI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VYMI's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWICWI | $2B | — | 346 | 72.5% |
| VXUSVXUS | $624B | — | 245 | 70.6% |
| VEUVEU | $86B | — | 244 | 70.6% |
| SPDWSPDW | $36B | — | 321 | 66.4% |
| VEAVanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares | $290B | — | 240 | 64.1% |
73% of VYMI's portfolio by weight is also held by CWI. When CWI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VYMI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVYMI's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 22% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 21% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VYMI collectively pay out 57% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 14% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVYMI is up 29.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +24.3%. The remaining +5.0% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 20% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VYMI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VYMI's analyzed weight, 59% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 41% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 12% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
SEVEREHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VYMI has a Passive Crowding Score of 100/100. On average, 63.7% of the market capitalization of VYMI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. In the event of a broad sell-off, VYMI faces elevated "gap-down" risk — as passive redemptions force simultaneous selling of constituents where a large portion of the float is not actively trading.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | HSBC Holdings plc | 1.76% | — | — |
| 2 | NOVN | Novartis AG | 1.58% | — | — |
| 3 | RY | Royal Bank of Canada Financial Services | 1.57% | 20.0x | 3/9 |
| 4 | ROP | Roche Holding AG Technology | 1.57% | 22.7x | 5/9 |
| 5 | NESN | Nestle SA | 1.43% | — | — |
| 6 | SHEL | Shell plc Energy | 1.18% | 13.3x | 5/9 |
| 7 | 8306 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. | 1.17% | — | — |
| 8 | BHP | BHP Group Ltd. Basic Materials | 1.15% | 20.1x | 4/9 |
| 9 | TD | Toronto-Dominion Bank Financial Services | 1.10% | 20.7x | 4/9 |
| 10 | 2454 | MediaTek Inc. | 1.08% | — | — |
| 11 | CBA | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 1.03% | — | — |
| 12 | ALV | Allianz SE Consumer Cyclical | 0.98% | 13.5x | 7/9 |
| 13 | 7203 | Toyota Motor Corp. | 0.98% | — | — |
| 14 | IBE | Iberdrola SA | 0.91% | — | — |
| 15 | UBSG | UBS Group AG | 0.84% | — | — |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VYMI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
15 holdings · 18.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.76% | 19,193,369 | $362.9M |
| 2 | NOVN | 1.58% | 2,089,882 | $326.6M |
| 3 | ROP | 1.57% | 786,078 | $323.1M |
| 4 | RY | 1.57% | 1,562,557 | $323.6M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.43% | 2,883,287 | $295.7M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.18% | 6,286,016 | $244.2M |
| 7 | 8306 | 1.17% | 12,172,732 | $242.5M |
| 8 | BHP | 1.15% | 5,696,619 | $237.4M |
| 9 | TD | 1.10% | 1,870,877 | $227.5M |
| 10 | 2454 | 1.08% | 1,643,092 | $223.9M |
| 11 | CBA | 1.03% | 1,869,008 | $213.0M |
| 12 | ALV | 0.98% | 428,161 | $202.7M |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.98% | 12,015,487 | $201.3M |
| 14 | IBE | 0.91% | 7,531,636 | $187.5M |
| 15 | UBSG | 0.84% | 3,501,865 | $173.6M |
2026-07-18
15 holdings · 18.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.76% | 19,193,369 | $362.9M |
| 2 | NOVN | 1.58% | 2,089,882 | $326.6M |
| 3 | RY | 1.57% | 1,562,557 | $323.6M |
| 4 | ROP | 1.57% | 786,078 | $323.1M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.43% | 2,883,287 | $295.7M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.18% | 6,286,016 | $244.2M |
| 7 | 8306 | 1.17% | 12,172,732 | $242.5M |
| 8 | BHP | 1.15% | 5,696,619 | $237.4M |
| 9 | TD | 1.10% | 1,870,877 | $227.5M |
| 10 | 2454 | 1.08% | 1,643,092 | $223.9M |
| 11 | CBA | 1.03% | 1,869,008 | $213.0M |
| 12 | ALV | 0.98% | 428,161 | $202.7M |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.98% | 12,015,487 | $201.3M |
| 14 | IBE | 0.91% | 7,531,636 | $187.5M |
| 15 | UBSG | 0.84% | 3,501,865 | $173.6M |
2026-07-17
15 holdings · 18.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.76% | 19,193,369 | $362.9M |
| 2 | NOVN | 1.58% | 2,089,882 | $326.6M |
| 3 | ROP | 1.57% | 786,078 | $323.1M |
| 4 | RY | 1.57% | 1,562,557 | $323.6M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.43% | 2,883,287 | $295.7M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.18% | 6,286,016 | $244.2M |
| 7 | 8306 | 1.17% | 12,172,732 | $242.5M |
| 8 | BHP | 1.15% | 5,696,619 | $237.4M |
| 9 | TD | 1.10% | 1,870,877 | $227.5M |
| 10 | 2454 | 1.08% | 1,643,092 | $223.9M |
| 11 | CBA | 1.03% | 1,869,008 | $213.0M |
| 12 | 7203 | 0.98% | 12,015,487 | $201.3M |
| 13 | ALV | 0.98% | 428,161 | $202.7M |
| 14 | IBE | 0.91% | 7,531,636 | $187.5M |
| 15 | UBSG | 0.84% | 3,501,865 | $173.6M |
2026-07-16
15 holdings · 18.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.76% | 19,193,369 | $362.9M |
| 2 | NOVN | 1.58% | 2,089,882 | $326.6M |
| 3 | RY | 1.57% | 1,562,557 | $323.6M |
| 4 | ROP | 1.57% | 786,078 | $323.1M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.43% | 2,883,287 | $295.7M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.18% | 6,286,016 | $244.2M |
| 7 | 8306 | 1.17% | 12,172,732 | $242.5M |
| 8 | BHP | 1.15% | 5,696,619 | $237.4M |
| 9 | TD | 1.10% | 1,870,877 | $227.5M |
| 10 | 2454 | 1.08% | 1,643,092 | $223.9M |
| 11 | CBA | 1.03% | 1,869,008 | $213.0M |
| 12 | ALV | 0.98% | 428,161 | $202.7M |
| 13 | 7203 | 0.98% | 12,015,487 | $201.3M |
| 14 | IBE | 0.91% | 7,531,636 | $187.5M |
| 15 | UBSG | 0.84% | 3,501,865 | $173.6M |
2026-07-15
15 holdings · 18.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.72% | 19,021,165 | $357.2M |
| 2 | ROP | 1.58% | 778,274 | $327.5M |
| 3 | NOVN | 1.55% | 2,128,117 | $320.1M |
| 4 | RY | 1.44% | 1,550,335 | $297.4M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.40% | 2,851,806 | $289.4M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.29% | 6,313,197 | $266.8M |
| 7 | BHP | 1.17% | 5,426,382 | $241.6M |
| 8 | 8306 | 1.11% | 12,178,200 | $228.9M |
| 9 | CBA | 1.06% | 1,850,158 | $219.3M |
| 10 | 2454 | 1.06% | 1,619,000 | $220.1M |
| 11 | 7203 | 1.04% | 11,406,233 | $215.8M |
| 12 | TD | 1.03% | 1,859,257 | $212.7M |
| 13 | ALV | 0.90% | 422,826 | $187.4M |
| 14 | TTE | 0.85% | 2,010,892 | $176.4M |
| 15 | IBE | 0.80% | 7,288,328 | $165.5M |
2026-07-14
15 holdings · 18.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HSBA | 1.72% | 19,021,165 | $357.2M |
| 2 | ROP | 1.58% | 778,274 | $327.5M |
| 3 | NOVN | 1.55% | 2,128,117 | $320.1M |
| 4 | RY | 1.44% | 1,550,335 | $297.4M |
| 5 | NESN | 1.40% | 2,851,806 | $289.4M |
| 6 | SHEL | 1.29% | 6,313,197 | $266.8M |
| 7 | BHP | 1.17% | 5,426,382 | $241.6M |
| 8 | 8306 | 1.11% | 12,178,200 | $228.9M |
| 9 | 2454 | 1.06% | 1,619,000 | $220.1M |
| 10 | CBA | 1.06% | 1,850,158 | $219.3M |
| 11 | 7203 | 1.04% | 11,406,233 | $215.8M |
| 12 | TD | 1.03% | 1,859,257 | $212.7M |
| 13 | ALV | 0.90% | 422,826 | $187.4M |
| 14 | TTE | 0.85% | 2,010,892 | $176.4M |
| 15 | IBE | 0.80% | 7,288,328 | $165.5M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VYMI Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VYMI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.